Cover not available

In:Polylogues on The Mental Lexicon: An exploration of fundamental issues and directions
Edited by Gary Libben †, Gonia Jarema and Victor Kuperman
[Not in series 238] 2021
► pp. 187–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Morphological schemas

Theoretical and psycholinguistic issues

 | Tufts University | MIT
ORCiD logo with link | Leiden University
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.238.07jac
Article outline
  • Thesis
  • Commentaries on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
    • James Myers commentary on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
    • Dorit Ravid commentary on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
    • Russell Richie commentary on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
    • Benjamin Tucker commentary on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
    • Chris Westbury commentary on Jackendoff and Audring thesis
  • The Article
    • 1.Overall goals
    • 2.Representations in relational morphology
      • 2.1Rules, reconceived as schemas, are in the lexicon
      • 2.2Two functions of schemas
      • 2.3Inheritance: Spelling out the relational function
      • 2.4Summary so far and prospectus
    • 3.Acquisition of productive schemas relies on the relational function
    • 4.Theory of processing: Basic assumptions
    • 5.Schemas in processing
    • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (79)
References
Amenta, S., and Crepaldi, D. (2012) Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological efffecs in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R. (1997) Singulars and Plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a Parallel Dual-Route Model, Journal of Memory and Language 37, 94–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., and Lieber, R. (1991) Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study. Linguistics 29, 801–844. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1986) Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berwick, R., and Chomsky, N. (2016) Why Only Us? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bien, H., Baayen, R. H., and Levelt, W. J. M. (2011) Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 683–715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, K., and Loebell, H. (1990) Framing sentences. Cognition 35, 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2010) Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017) Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology. In Nikolas Gisborne and Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Default inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. (1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (ed.), Language Production: Vol. 2, 257–294. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001) Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., and D. Slobin. (1982) Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58: 265–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1999) Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 991–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, A., and Loftus, E. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82, 407–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, A., and Quillian, M. (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9, 240–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. (1999) Syntactic Nuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W., and Jackendoff, R. (2005) Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W., and Nowak, A. (2003) Dynamical Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daelemans, W., De Smet, K., and Gazdar, G. (1992) Inheritance in natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 18, 205–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
deJong, N. (2002) Morphological Families in the Mental Lexicon. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, F. (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger, Lausanne and Paris: Payot; trans. W. Baskin, Course in General Linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins, 1977.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorentino, R. and Poeppel, D. (2007) Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 953–1000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. (1998) Learning to parse? In D. Swinney (ed.) Anniversary issue of Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27.2, 285–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R., and King, P. A. (2009) Memory and the Computational Brain. Malden, MA; Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Constructions at work, Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. (2005) On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 416–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2003) 2003. The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32, 101–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011) What a rational parser would do. Cognitive Science 35, 399–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M., and Marantz, A. (1993) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. (1989) Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process, 392–408. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., and Baayen, H. (2005) Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology, Trends in Cognitive Science 9.7, 342–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, T. and Trousdale, G. (eds.) (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1975) Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon, Language 51.3, 639–671. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002) Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007) A Parallel Architecture Perspective on Language Processing, Brain Research 1146, 2–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010) Meaning and the Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. and Audring, J. (2020) The Texture of the Lexicon: Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. (2007) Frequency, neighborhood density, age-of-acquisition, lexicon size, neighborhood density and speed of processing: Towards a domain-general, single-mechanism account. In S. Buescher, K. Holley, E. Ashworth, C. Beckner, B. Jones, and C. Shank. Proceedings of the 6th Annual High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, 121–40. Albuquerque, NM: High Desert Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G., and Jaeger, F. (2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 31: 32–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Bertram, R. and Baayen, R. H. (2008) Morphological Dynamics in Compound Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089–1132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 1–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2008) Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension. Cognition 106(3):1126–1177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, G. (2006) Why study compounds? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema, (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 1–21).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1998) Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 37, 243–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001) The Algebraic Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982) Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 1–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken language understanding. Cognition 25, 71–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., and Zwitserlood, P. (1989) Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 576–585.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (2002) The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S., Weeman, F., and Wijnen, F. (eds.) (2002) Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, T. J. (2015) Productivity and Reuse in Language: A Theory of Linguistic Computation and Storage. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oldfield, R., and Wingfield, A. (1965) Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17, 273–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999) Words and rules, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, I. (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollard, C. and Sag, I. (1994) Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., and Panther, K.-U. (2004) Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In G. Radden and K.-U. Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, 1–46. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reifegerste, J. (2014) Morphological Processing in Younger and Older People: Evidence for Flexible Dual-Route Access. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riehemann, S. (1988) Type-based derivational morphology. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 49–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1980) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer, Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: 33–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D., and McClelland, J. (1986) On learning the past tense of English verbs. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. ii, 216–71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreuder, R., and R. H. Baayen. (1995) Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, 131–154. Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siddiqi, D. (2019) Distributed Morphology. In J. Audring and F. Masini (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–165.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smolensky, P., and Legendre, G. (2006) The Harmonic Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swinney, D. (1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 645–659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, M. (2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M., Leiman, J. M., Seidenberg, M. (1979) Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 427–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2015) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. pp. 135–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenberg, E. and Snedeker, J. (2014) It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29.5, 635–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, W. (1980) Multiple theory formation in speech and reading. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer, Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: 59–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. (2016) The Price of Linguistic Productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue