In:Polylogues on The Mental Lexicon: An exploration of fundamental issues and directions
Edited by Gary Libben †, Gonia Jarema and Victor Kuperman
[Not in series 238] 2021
► pp. 45–76
Chapter 3Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain
Explaining semantics without semantics
Published online: 13 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.238.03wes
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.238.03wes
Article outline
- Thesis
- Commentaries on Westbury thesis
- Ray Jackendoff commentary on Westbury thesis
- James Myers commentary on Westbury thesis
- Dorit Ravid commentary on Westbury thesis
- Russel Richie commentary on Westbury thesis
- Benjamin Tucker commentary on Westbury thesis
- The article
- What makes an explanation non-dormitive?
- Mapping lexical semantics into other domains
- Domain 1: Co-occurrence of linguistic units
- Domain 2: Extensions to discriminative learning
- Domain 3: Word form
- Domain 4: Action in the real world
- Domain 5: Real world simulation
- Domain 6: Embodied human experience
- Domain 7: Metaphorical extensions of embodied human experience
- Domain 8: Affect
- Semantics as a mapping from multiple domains
- a.Semantic representations are not unitary
- b.Semantic access is not one single process
- Explaining semantics without semantics
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (77)
Adelman, J. S., and Estes, Z. (2013). Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal. Cognition, 129(3), 530–5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.
Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463–98.
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Fiebach, C. J., Naranayan, S., Feldman, J., Dodge, E., & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Modulation of the FFA and PPA by language related to faces and places. Social neuroscience, 3(3–4), 229–238.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An Amorphous Model for Morphological Processing in Visual Comprehension based on Naive Discriminative Learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481.
Baayen, H., Shaoul, C., Willits, J., & Ramscar, M. (2016). Comprehension without segmentation: A proof of concept with naive discrimination learning. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(1), 106–128.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press.
Bergen, B., & Chang, N. (2013). Embodied Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 168–190) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. J. (2014). What do philosophers believe?. Philosophical Studies, 170(3), 465-500.
Buchanan, L., Westbury, C., & Burgess, C. (2001). Characterizing Semantic Space: Neighbourhood Effects in Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin And Review, 8(3), 531–544.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281.
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. Neuroimage, 83, 862–869.
Durda, K., & Buchanan, L. (2008). WINDSORS: Windsor improved norms of distance and similarity of representations of semantics. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 705–712.
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive science, 33(4), 547–582.
Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory and Cognition 29, 336–343.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In: Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (p. 127–143). [R. Shaw and J. Bransford, Eds.] Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
Greenberg, V. D. (1997). Freud and his aphasia book: Language and the sources of psychoanalysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.
Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15:2, 135–175.
Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2016). The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1744–1756.
Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Lefsrud, L. (2017). Extrapolating Human Judgments from Skip-gram Vector Representations of Word Meaning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1603–1619.
James, W. (1890/1950). The Principle of Psychology, Volumes One and Two. New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Johns, B. T. & Jones, M. N. (2015). Generating structure from experience: A retrieval-based model of language processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 233–251.
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37.
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112, 473–481.
Kugler, P. N. & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kussmaul, A. (1877). Die störungen der sprache: Versuch einer pathologie der sprache. Leipsig, Germany: Vogel.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press.
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.
Lifchitz, A., Jhean-Larose, S., & Denhière, G. (2009). Effect of tuned parameters on an LSA multiple choice questions answering model. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1201–1209.
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of The Living. Drodrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing.
McKinley, M. J. & Johnson, A. K. (2004). The physiological regulation of thirst and fluid intake. News in Physiological Sciences, 19, 1–6.
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Retrieved from arXiv: 1301.3781.
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (pp. 3111–3119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mingers, J. (1995). Self-producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis, New York, USA: Plenum Press.
Moliere. (1673/2003). The Imaginary Invalid [La Malade Imaginaire]. Downloaded October 1, 2015 from: [URL]
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, Il: University of Illinois Press.
Plaster, K., & Polinsky, M. (2007). Women are not dangerous things: Gender and categorization. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 12. Downloaded September 10, 2016 from: [URL]
Reilly, J., Westbury, C., Kean, J., & Peele, J. (2012). Arbitrary Symbolism in Natural Language Revisited: When Word Forms Carry Meaning PLoS ONE 7(8), e42286.
Reilly, J., Hung, J., & Westbury, C. (2017). Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness. Cognitive science, 41(4), 1071–1089.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160.
Roy, D. K. & Pentland, A. P. (2002). Learning words from sights and sounds: A computational model. Cognitive Science, 26, 113–146.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In: A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, p. 71–82.
Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2008). HiDEx: The high dimensional explorer. Edmonton, AB. Retrieved from [URL]
(2010). Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 393–413.
(2011). HiDEx: The High Dimensional Explorer. In: Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution. Editors P. McCarthy and C. Boonthum. IGI Global, 230–246.
Smith, L. B., Suanda, S. H., & Yu, C. (2014). The unrealized promise of infant statistical word-referent learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18(5), 251–258.
Smith, L. & You, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situtaional statistics. Cognition, 106, 1558–1568.
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999.
Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (1994). A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1993). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science And Human Experience. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 219–247.
Westbury, C. (2013). You can’t drink a word: Lexical and individual emotionality affect subjective familiarity judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(5), 631–49.
Westbury, C., Keith, J., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Avoid violence, rioting and outrage; Approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1599–1622.
Westbury, C. F., Shaoul, C., Hollis, G., Smithson, L., Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2013). Now you see it, now you don’t: On emotion, context, & the algorithmic prediction of human imageability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4:991.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
