In:Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie
[Not in series 235] 2021
► pp. 151–152
References
Published online: 11 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.235.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.235.refs
Street Jr., R. L., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74, 295–301.
De Haes, H., & Bensing, J. (2009). Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient education and counseling, 74(3), 287–294.
Labrie, N. (2012). Strategic maneuvering in treatment decision-making discussions:
two cases in point. Argumentation, 26(2), 171–199.
(2013). Strategically eliciting concessions from patients in treatment
decision-making discussions. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2(3), 322–341.
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2014). Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the
role of argumentation in doctor–patient communication. Health Communication, 29(10), 996–1008.
Labrie, N. H., & Schulz, P. J. (2015a). Exploring the relationships between participatory
decision-making, visit duration, and general practitioners’ provision of
argumentation to support their medical advice: results from a content
analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(5), 572–577.
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2015b). Quantifying doctors’ argumentation in general practice
consultation through content analysis: Measurement development and
preliminary results. Argumentation, 29(1), 33–55.
Labrie, N. H., & Schulz, P. J. (2015c). The effects of general practitioners’ use of argumentation to
support their treatment advice: Results of an experimental study using
video-vignettes. Health Communication, 30(10), 951–961.
Pilgram, R. (2015). A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical
study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. Doctoral dissertation: University of Amsterdam.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Mohammed, D. (2012). Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared
medical decision-making. Journal of Argumentation in context, 1(1), 19–32.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. (2012). The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in
medical discussions: Institutional safeguards for the quality of shared
decision making. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Between scientists and citizens: Proceedings of a Conference at Iowa
State University (June 1–2, 2012). Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.