In:Japanese Mood and Modality in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application
Edited by Ken-Ichi Kadooka
[Not in series 234] 2021
► pp. 133–176
Chapter 5The cognitive and linguistic reasoning process of the speaker’s choice of
modal expressions
Modality from the perspective of pragmatic impairment
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.234.04kat
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.234.04kat
Abstract
The inability to use modality appropriately observed in
individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is generally viewed as pragmatic
impairment. This
current study explores the divergent modal usage of ASD individuals, viewing
it as a pragmatic impairment to be examined from neurological, cognitive,
and linguistic perspectives. Based on statistical data derived from
observations of how ASD persons use modal expressions while speaking, this
paper clarifies the nature of their pragmatic impairment and proposes a new
model for
research. Although Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) did not explore the
cognitive side of language use, the current study supports the view that
pragmatic competency is primarily a neurocognitive and secondarily a
linguistic function. This is evidenced by the empirical studies of
lexicogrammatical choices made by individuals with cognitive disability such
as ASD, as the current study shows. The central issue is that seeing
pragmatic impairment from the neurocognitive perspective tells us
how various factors (in addition to language) are integrated when normal
people engage in conversational exchange in interpersonal situations.
Keywords: Pragmatic impairment, modality, SFL, ASD, clinical linguistics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework of SFL
- 2.1Synoptic view of the text defined in SFL
- 2.2Language as system network
- 2.3Theoretical framework of modality in SFL constructs
- 2.4Grammatical metaphor / metaphorical realization
- 2.5Orientation
- 3.General picture of ASD from the neurological perspective
- 4.Method
- 4.1Corpus data and materials
- 1.Corpus
- 2.Participants
- 3.Materials
- 4.2Procedure
- 4.1Corpus data and materials
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Theory of Mind (ToM)
- 6.2Executive function (EF)
- 6.3Central coherence (CC)
- 6.4Preference for expectation and inclination
- 7.The process leading to pragmatic impairment
- Procedure 1: Consideration of contexts of culture and situation
- Procedure 2: Text-making processes in semantics, choices of lexicogrammar, and actual utterances
- 8.Determinant factor of making choices
- 9.Conclusion
Notes Abbreviations for grammatical items References
References (78)
Abell, F., Happe, F., Frith, U. (2000). “Do
triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated
shapes in normal and abnormal
development”. Cognitive
Development 15, 1–16.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) : Fifth Edition.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). “Does
the autistic child have a ‘theory of
mind?’”. Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Baron-Cohen, S., Lieslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1986). “Mechanical,
behavioral and intentional understanding of picture stories in
autistic children”. British Journal of
Developmental
Psychology, 4, 113–125.
Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and Function: An Introduction to Three Major Structural Functional Theories. Part 1: Approaches
to the Simplex
Clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., and Frith, U. (2002). “Autism,
Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental
states to animated
shapes” Brain, 125, 1839–1849.
Fine, C., Lumsden, J. and Blair, R. J. R. (2001). “Dissociation
between ‘theory of mind’ and executive functions in a patient with early left
amygdala
damage”. Brain, 124, 287–98.
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., Brooks, P. J., and Samuels, M. C. (1996). “Inference
and action in early causal
reasoning.” Developmental
Psychology. 32:120–31.
Fukuda, K. (2013). Taijin Kankei no Gengogaku:
Poraitonesu kara no Nagame [Linguisitics of Interpersonal Relations: A view from
Politeness]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
(2016). “Kino bunpo de no joho taikei /
modarithi no teigi [Definition of mood system / modality in functional
grammar].” Kadooka, K., Igarashi, K., Iimura, R., Fukuda, K. and S. Kato, Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo modarithi
Kenkyu [Studies in
Japanese Modality Based on Functional
Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio. 113–172.
Fukui, T. (2010). “Some
hints to understand executive function
.” Japanese Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, Vol.12. No.3・4.
Gopnik, A. and Aslington, J. W. (1988). “Children’s
understanding of representational change and its relation to the
understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality
distinction”. Child
Development, 59(1), 26–37.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). “Functional
Diversity in Language as seen from a Consideration of Modality and
Mood in English. Foundations of
Language”, International Journal of
Language and
Philosophy, 6, 322–61.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing
Experience through Meaning.: A Language-based Approach to
Cognition. London: Cassell.
Happe, F. G. E. (1994). “An
Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Understanding of Story
Characters’ Thoughts and Feelings by Able Autistic, Mentally
Handicapped, and Normal Children and
Adults.” Journal of Autism and
Developmental
Disorders, 24. 129–154.
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. (1986). “Universals
of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and
American English”. Journal of
Pragmatics 10, 347–371.
Hobson, R. P., Ouston, J. and Lee, A. (1989). “Emotion-related
and abstract concepts in autistic people: evidence from the British
Picture Vocabulary Scale.” Journal of
Autism ad Developmental
Disorders, 4, 601–24.
Ide, S. (1992). “On
the Notion of Wakimae: Toward an Integrated Framework of Linguistic
Politeness.” Mosaic of Language:
Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic
Sciety
(MLS), 298–305.
Kadooka, K., Iimura, R., Igarashi, K., Fukuda, K. and Kato, S. (2016). Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo modarithi
Kenkyu [Studies in
Japanese Modality Based on Functional
Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
Kamio, A. (1997). Territory
of
Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kandabashi, J. (1990). Seishinryouho mensetsu no
kotsu [A knack for
psychiatric
interview]. Tokyo: Iwasaki Gakujutsu Shuppansha.
Kato, S. (2016a). Psychotherapy rinsho
gengoron [Clinical
linguistics for
psychotherapy]. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten. Co. Ltd.
(2016b). “Tekusuto bunseki no naka de
taijinteki shigen wo kangaeru [Thinking of interpersonal language resources in text
analysis].” Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo Modarithi
Kenkyu [Studies in
Japanese Modality Based on Functional
Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers. 229–294.
(2019). “Jiheisho spectrum shogai no
goyoronteki shogai kara toraeru ninchishinkeigaku/gengogakuteki
gensho toshite no modarithi [Looking at Modality as a Neurocognitive and Linguistic
Phenomenon from the Perspective of Pragmatic Impairment in Autism
Spectrum Disorder].” Japanese Journal
of Systemic Functional
Linguistics, 10, 73–97.
Kikuchi, Y., Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Osanai, H., and Hasegawa, T. (2009). “Faces
do not capture special attention in children with autism spectrum
disorder:
A change blindness study”. Child
Development, 80, 1421–1433.
Klin, A. (2000). “Attributing
Social Meaning to Ambiguous Visual Stimuli in Higher-functioning
Autism and Asperger Syndrome: The Social Attribution
Task.” J. Child Psychol.
Psychiat. Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 831–846.
Litowitz, B. (2005). “The
Origins of Ethics: Deontic
Modality.” International Journal of
Applied Psychoanalytic
Studies. 2(3):249–259.
Martin, I. and McDonald, S. (2003). “Weak
coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the
puzzle of pragmatic language
disorders”. Brain and
language, 85, 451–66.
Martin, J. R. (1985). “Process and text: Two aspects of semiosis”: In J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse, Vol. I (pp. 248–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
(1991). “Intrinsic
functionality: Implications for contextual
theory”. Social
Semiotics, 1 (1), 99–162.
(1992). English
Text. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(1999). “Modeling
Context: A Crooked Path of Progress in Contextual
Linguistic”. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text
and Context in Functional
Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25–61.
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical
Cartography. Tokyo: International Language Science Publisher.
McDonald, S. (1999). “Exploring
the Process of Inference Generation in Sarcasm: A Review of Normal
and Clinical Studies.” Brain and
Language, 68, 486–506.
Muntigl, P. (2004). Narrative
Counseling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Nuyts, J. and Roeck, A. D. (1997). “Autism
and meta-representation: the case of epistemic
modality”. European Journal of
Disorders of
Communication, 32, 113–17.
Oi, M. (2006). “Koukinou Kouhansei hattatsushogai ni
tomonau goyo shogai: tokuchou, haikei,
shien [Pragmatic
disorder with high-functioning pervasive developmental
disorders].” The Japanese journal of
communication
disorders, 23, 87–104.
Ozonoff, S. (1997). “Components
of executive function in autism and other
disorders.” In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism
as an Executive
Disorder. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 179–211.
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F. and Rogers, S. J. (1991). “Executive
function deficits in high functioning autistic individuals:
relationship to theory of
mind”. Journal of Child Psychology
and
Psychiatry, 32, 1081–106.
Perkins, M. (1983a). “The
acquisition of modal
expressions.” Unpublished paper given
at 1983 BAAI Annual Meeting Leicester
Polytechnic.
(1991). “Production
and comprehension of modal expressions by children with a pragmatic
disability.” First
Language, 11(33);416–416.
Perkins, M. R. and Firth, C. (1991). “Production
and comprehension of modal expressions by children with a pragmatic
disability”. First
Language, 11, 61.
Perner, J. (1993). “The
theory of mind deficit in autism: rethinking the metarepresentation
theory.” In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding
Other Mind. 112–137. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
Pinker, S., and Bloom, P. (1990). “Natural
Language and Natural
Selection.” Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 13 (4), 707–784.
Rogers, S. J. and Dawson, G. (2010). Early
Start Denver Model for Young Children with
Autism. N.Y.: The Guilford Press.
Roth, D. and Leslie, A. M. (1991). “The
recognition of attitude conveyed by utterance: a study of preschool and
autistic children”. British Journal
of Developmental
Psychology, 9, 315–30.
Russell, J. (1995). “At
two with nature: agency and the development of self-world
dualism.” In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, and N. Eilan (Eds.) The
body and the
self. Cambridge: MIT Press; 127–51.
(1997). “How
executive disorders can bring about an inadequate ‘theory of
mind’”. In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism
as an Executive
Disorder. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 256–304.
Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Dairoku, H., and Hasegawa, T. (2004). “Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism”. Journal of Child Psychol, Psychiatry, 45, 445–458.
Senju, J. (2014). “Kyoukan to jiheisho
supekutoramusho [Empathy and autism spectrum
symptoms].” Kyokan [empathy]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, Publishers.
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., and Silber, S. (1983). “The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state.” Cognition, 14(3), 301-321.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2005). “Pragmatics”. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (Eds.), Oxford
handbook of Contemporary Analytic
Philosophy, 468–501. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Sugiyama, T. (2004). Komyunikeishon shougai toshite no
jiheishou [Autism as
communication disorder]. Advances in
Research on Autism and Developmental
Disorder, Vol.8, 3–23. Tokyo: Seiwa Shoten Publishers.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). “Autistic
children’s talk about psychological states: deficits in the early
acquisition of a theory of
mind”. Child
Development, 63, 161–72.
(1995). “Once
upon a ribbit”: stories narrated by autistic
children”. British Journal of
Developmental
Psychology, 13, 45–59.
(1997). “Language
acquisition and theory of mind: contributions from the study of
autism.” In L. B. Adamson and M. A. Romski (Eds.), Communication
and Language Acquisition: Discoveries from Atypical
Development, 135–60. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Thomas, P., Kearney, G., Napier, E., Ellis, E., Leuder, I. and Johnson, M. (1996). “Speech
and language in first onset psychosis differences between people
with schizophrenia, mania, and
controls”. British Journal of
Psychiatry 168:337–343. Pubmed?.
Thomas, P., King, K., Fraser, W. I. and Kendell, R. E. (1990). “Linguistic
performance in schizophrenia: a comparison of acute and cronic
patients”. British Journal of
Psychiatry 156: 204–210.
Vivanti, G. and Rogers, S. J. (2014). “Autism
and the mirror neuron system: insights from learning and
teaching.” Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society
B. 369: 20130184.
Volkmar, F. R. and Klin, A. (1993). “Social
development in autism: historical and clinical
perspectives”. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Mind. 40–55. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
Wilson, J. and McAnulty, L. (2000). “What
do you have in mind? Belifs, knowledge and pragmatic
impairment
”. In N. Muller (Ed.), Pragmatics
and Clinical
Applications, 29–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
