In:Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
[Not in series 225] 2019
► pp. 83–101
Chapter 5Exploring the narrative dimension in late Modern English History texts
Published online: 9 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.05mon
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.05mon
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The multidimensional analysis and the “narrative” dimension
- 3.Corpus and methodology
- 4.Analysis of data
- 4.1Variation across time and disciplines
- 4.2Variation across genres within eighteenth-century CHET
- 5.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (39)
Atkinson, Dwight. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1965. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2001). Dimensions of variation among eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies (200–214). Harlow: Longman.
. (2016). Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. In Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (Eds.), Genre- and register-related discourse features in contrast (7–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. (2001). Intra-textual variation wihin medical research articles. In Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (108–123). Harlow: Longman.
Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. (2013). Being specific about historical change: the influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41, 104–134.
Camiña, Gonzalo & Inés Lareo. (2016). Editorial policy in the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts: Criteria, conventions, encoding and other marks. In Isabel Moskowich, Gonzalo Camiña, Inés Lareo, & Begoña Crespo (Eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English texts on philosophy (45–60). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Conrad, Susan. (1996). Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.
. (2001). Variation among disciplinary texts: A comparison of textbooks and journal articles in biology and history. In Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies (94–107). Harlow: Longman.
Croce, Benedetto. (1921). Theory and history of historiography. Translated by Douglas Ainslie. London: George G. Harrap & Company.
Dray, William Herbert. (1971). On the nature and role of narrative in historiography. History and Theory, 10(2), 153–171.
Gallie, Walter Bryce. (1964). Narrative and historical understanding. History and Theory, 6(2), 149–172.
Gotti, Maurizio. (2001). The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies, 5/2, 221–239.
Gray, Bethany. (2011). Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Grieve, Jack. (2016). Regional variation in written American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, Andrew. (2012). CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409.
Hyland, Ken. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja; Juhani Rudanko & Erik Smitterberg. (2000). Building a bridge between the present and the past: A corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME Journal, 24, 85–97.
Lareo, Inés. (2011). Colocacións con make, take e do + nome nun corpus do século XIX de textos ingleses científicos e literarios escritos por mulleres. Cadernos de Fraseoloxía Galega, 13, 191–214.
Marenco, Franco. (2009). Narrative in History / History in Narrative. In Block de Behar, Lisa; Paola Mildonian; Jean-Michel Djian; Djelal Kadir; Alfons Knauth; Dolores Romero López & Marcio Seligmann Silva (Eds.), Comparative literature: Sharing knowledges for preserving cultural diversity. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Vol. I. Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
Mink, Louis. (1970). History and fiction as modes of comprehension. New Literary History, 1, 541–558.
Monaco, Leida Maria. (2017). A multidimensional analysis of late modern English scientific texts from the Coruña Corpus. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of A Coruña.
Moskowich, Isabel. (2017). Genre and change in the Corpus of History English Texts. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16(3), 84–106.
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo (Eds.) (2012). Astronomy ‘playne and simple’: The writing of science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Moskowich, Isabel; Gonzalo Camiña, Inés Lareo, & Begoña Crespo (Eds.) (2016). ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English texts on philosophy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rüsen, Jörn. (2005). History: Narration, interpretation, orientation. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Stone, Lawrence. (1979). The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. Past & Present, 85, 3–24.
Van Seters, John. (1997). In search of history: Historiography in the ancient world and the origins of biblical history. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
White, Hayden. (1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press.
. (1984). The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and Theory, 23(1), 1–33.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Claridge, Claudia
Monaco, Leida Maria
2021. Spotting register-internal variation in eighteenth- and
nineteenth-century life sciences. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
