In:Atypical Language Development in Romance Languages
Edited by Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Lucía Buil-Legaz, Raúl López-Penadés, Victor A. Sanchez-Azanza and Daniel Adrover-Roig
[Not in series 223] 2019
► pp. 143–166
Get fulltext
Real-time comprehension of sentences in children with SLI
Evidence from eye movements
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 11 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.223.09and
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.223.09and
Verbs play an essential role in enabling sentences to be interpreted rapidly in real time. The objective of this work is to investigate how verb information is used during real-time comprehension of sentences in Spanish. Twenty-five children (aged 5.3–8.2 years) with specific language impairment (SLI), fifty typically developing children (aged 3.3–8.2 years), and thirty-one normal adults participated in three eye-tracking experiments involving spoken language comprehension. Participants listened to simple sentences in the presence of four depicted objects, only one of which satisfied the semantic restrictions of the verb. Eye movements revealed that children with SLI were able to recognize and retrieve the meaning of the verb rapidly enough to anticipate the upcoming semantically appropriate referent.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Experiment 1
- Methodology
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Methodology
- Experiment 2
- Methodology
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Methodology
- Experiment 3
- Methodology
- Participants
- Materials
- Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Methodology
- General discussion
Appendix References
References (29)
Andreu, L., Sanz-Torrent, M., Trueswell, J. 2012. Anticipatory sentence processing in children with SLI: Evidence from eye movements during listening. Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 5–44.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247–264.
Barr, D. 2008. Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 457–474.
Bedore L., & Leonard L. (1998) Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 965–1220.
Bedore, L. M., & Leonard, L. B. (2001). Grammatical Morphology Deficits in Spanish-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(4), 905–924. )
Boland, J. E., and Boehm-Jernigan, H. (1998). Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 394, 684–719.
Bosque, I., and Demonte, V. (eds.) (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Carlson, G., & Tanenhaus, M. 1988. Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Thematic relations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fischer, B. (1992). Saccadic reaction time: Implications for reading,dyslexia and visual cognition. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movementsand visual cognition: Scene perception and reading(pp. 31–45).New York: Springer Verlag.
Grinstead, J., De la Mora, J., Pratt, A. & Flores, B. 2009. Temporal interface delay and root non-finite verbs in Spanish-speaking children with Speciic Language Impairment: Evidence from the grammaticality choice task. In Hispanic Child Languages: Typical and Impaired Development [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 50], J. Grinstead (ed.), 239–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. 2003. Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 133–156.
Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. 2006. Cognitive and linguistic issues in the study of children with specific language disorders. In M. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101, 676–703.
Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. K. J. 2007. On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 42(5), 557–582.
Martin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Infor-mation processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372–380.
Mauner, G., & Koenig, J. P. 2000. Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 110–134.
Montgomery J. 2000. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(2), 293–308.
Montgomery, J. W. 2002. Examining the nature of lexical processing in children with specific language impairment: Temporal processing or processing capacity deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics 23, 447–470.
Montgomery, J. W., Scudder, R. R., & Moore, C. 1990. Language-impaired children’s real time comprehension of spoken language. Applied Psycholinguistics 11, 273–290.
Saslow, M. G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1024–1029.
Stark, R. E., & Montgomery, J. W. 1995. Sentence processing in language impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression. Applied Psycholinguistics 16, 137–154.
Stevenson, S. (1998). Parsing as incremental restructuring. In Reanalysis in Sentence Processing, eds J. D. Fodor and F. Ferreira (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 327–363.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–1634.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
