In:Interactional Studies of Qualitative Research Interviews:
Edited by Kathryn Roulston
[Not in series 220] 2019
► pp. 219–238
Chapter 10Continuers in research interviews
A closer look at the construction of rapport in talk about interfaith dialogue
Published online: 25 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.220.10pop
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.220.10pop
Abstract
Richards (2011) discussed the importance of understanding the role that continuers (Schegloff 1982) play in research interviews, proposing that understanding how talk is organized has been overlooked in researcher training. This paper draws from ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to explore the researcher’s use of “mm hm” as a response token in a set of three interviews conducted with one participant during a qualitative case study. Specifically, it focuses on how the use of “mm hm” as a continuer, an acknowledgement token used as a way to give attention to participant accounting, and the use of silence might contribute to the interactional accomplishment of establishing rapport. Finally, the researcher reflects on the usefulness of examining response tokens in research interviews ethnomethodologically, the implications for developing interviewing expertise, and offers suggestions for future research.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The response token “mm hm” as a continuer
- Attention to participant accounting
- Silence
- Discussion
- Continuers, acknowledgement tokens, and silence in developing rapport
- Conclusions
Note
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Paul, Christine
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
