Cover not available

In:Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 215–233

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 9
Macrofamilies and agricultural lexicon

Problems and perspectives

 | Russian State University for the Humanities/Russian Presidential Academy, Moscow
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.09sta
Abstract
It is more or less self-evident that the origins of agriculture cannot be directly associated with the ancestral speakers of any of the commonly accepted, non-controversial language families such as Indo-European, Semitic, Dravidian, etc., since these origins go much deeper back in time than any of these ancestral languages. Consequently, in this paper I present a brief overview of some of the most promising, if controversial, hypotheses on deep-level language relationship between various linguistic stocks of Western and Central Eurasia in terms of whether or not there is a chance of reconstructing at least a small amount of agricultural terminology for such hypothetical entities as Proto-Nostratic, Proto-Sino-Caucasian, and Proto-Afroasiatic. The overview leads to the conclusion that some of the most archaic agricultural terminology in the Near East may be associated with the North Caucasian linguistic family and, possibly, also with Basque as its nearest genetic relative; at the same time, evidence of ancient agricultural lexicon in the Afroasiatic stock remains at best circumstantial, whereas evidence from various lineages of “Nostratic” is practically non-existent.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A.Nostratic
  • B.Sino-Caucasian
  • C.Afroasiatic
  • Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (49)
References
Agmon, Noam. 2010. Materials and language: Pre-Semitic root structure change concomitant with transition to agriculture. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 2: 23–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agmon, Noam & Bloch, Yigal. 2013. Statistics of language morphology change: From biconsonantal hunters to triconsonantal farmers. PLOS One 8 (12). .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, David W. 2013. Two IE phylogenies, three PIE migrations, and four kinds of steppe pastoralism. Journal of Language Relationship 9: 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bengtson, John D. 2008a. Materials for a comparative grammar of the Dene-Caucasian [Sino-Caucasian] languages. In Aspects of Comparative Linguistics 3, George Starostin (ed.), 45–118. Moscow: RSUH Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008b. A genetic comparison of Basque and Caucasian vocabulary. In Linguistic Fossils: Studies in Historical Linguistics and Paleolinguistics, John D. Bengtson (ed), 45–54. Calgary: Theophania Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 2012. Afroasiatic migrations: Linguistic evidence. Ms, paper presented at the conference Rethinking Africa’s Transcontinental Continuities in Pre- and Protohistory, African Studies Centre, Leiden.
Bomhard, Allan. 2014. A Comprehensive Introduction to Nostratic Comparative Linguistics. Charleston SC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco et al. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097): 957–960. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl. 1936. Jenisseisch-tibetische Wortgleichungen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 90(1): 149–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1957. Die Sprache der Jenissejer Genealogische und morphologische Untersuchungen. Anthropos 52(1–2): 65–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolgopolsky, Aharon. 1998. The Nostratic Macrofamily and Linguistic Palaeontology. Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Nostratic Dictionary. Oxford: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dybo, Anna. 2000. Mir praaltajcev: Wörter und Sachen (The world of Proto-Altaic speakers: Wörter und Sachen). In Problemy izuchenija dal’nego rodstva jazykov na rubezhe tretjego tys’acheletija (Problems of the Study of Long Distance Relationships between Languages on the Threshold of the Third Millennium), George Starostin & Sergei Starostin (eds), 38–48. Moscow: RSUH Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehret, Christopher. 1995. Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian). Vowels, Tone, Consonants, and Vocabulary. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Language and history. In African Languages: An Introduction, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 272–297. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 2007. Kartwelisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. & Ivanov, Vjačeslav V. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans. A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture, Part I: The Text. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray, Peiros, Ilia & Starostin, George. 2009. Distant language relationship: The current perspective. Journal of Language Relationship 1: 13–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D. & Atkinson, Quentin D. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426(6965): 435–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hajdu, Peter. 1975. Finno-Ugrian Languages and Peoples. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, David R. 1989. An evolutionary continuum of people-plant interaction. In Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, David R. Harris & Gordon C. Hillman (eds), 11–26. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 2000. Afroasiatic. In African Languages: an Introduction, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 74–98. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Illich-Svitych, V. M. 1971–1984. Opyt sravnenija nostraticheskix jazykov. Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ (An Attempt at a Comparative Dictionary of the Nostratic Languages). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2009. Proto-Uralic – what, where, and when? In The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 258], Jussi Ylikoski (ed.), 57–78. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassian, Alexei, Zhivlov, Mikhail & Starostin, George. 2015. Proto-Indo-European-Uralic comparison from the probabilistic point of view. Journal of Indo-European Studies 43(3–4): 301–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2010. Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroonen, Gus. 2012. Non-Indo-European root nouns in Germanic: Evidence in support of the Agricultural Substrate Hypothesis. In A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 266], Riho Grünthal & Petri Kallio (eds), 239–260. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Greger et al. 2014. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(17): 6139–6146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Militarev, Alexander. 2000. Towards the chronology of Afrasian (Afroasiatic) and its daughter families. In Time Depth in Historical Linguistics, Vol. 1: Colin Renfrew, April McMahon & Larry Trask (eds), 267–307. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The prehistory of a dispersal: The Proto-Afrasian (Afroasiatic) farming lexicon. In Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 135–150. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya & Lewis, Martin. 2015. The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and Language: the Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine Irma. 2005. Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Proto-Transeurasian: Where and when? Man in India 97(1): 19–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 2003. The vocabulary of cereal cultivation and the phylogeny of East Asian languages. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 23(1): 127–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 161–176. London: Routledge Curzon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starostin, George. 2014. Macro-comparative linguistics in the 21st century: State of the art and perspectives. Journal of Language Relationship 11: 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei. 1984. Gipoteza o geneticheskikh sv’az’akh sino-tibetskikh jazykov s jenisejskimi i severnokavkazskimi jazykami (A hypothesis about the genetic connections between Sino-Tibetan, Yeniseian, and North Caucasian languages). In Lingvisticheskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejshaja istorija Vostoka (Linguistic Reconstruction and the Prehistory of the East), Igor Vardul (ed.), 19–38. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Indoevropejsko-severnokavkazskije izoglossy (Indo-European-North Caucasian isoglosses). In Drevnij Vostok: etnokul’turnyje sv’azi (The Ancient Orient: Ethnocultural Ties), Grigory Bongard-Levin & Vladislav Ardzinba (eds), 112–163. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The cultural vocabulary in the common North Caucasian lexical stock. In Russian Oriental Studies, Vitaly Naumkin (ed.), 211–245. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Sino-Caucasian [comparative phonology, glossary]. Ms, <[URL]>
Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna & Mudrak, Oleg. 2003. Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei & Nikolayev, Sergei. 1994. A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolbova, Olga. 2016. Etimologicheskij slovar’ chadskikh jazykov (Chadic Etymological Dictionary). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theil, Rolf. 2006. Is Omotic Afroasiatic? A Critical Discussion. Ms, paper presented at the David Dwyer Retirement Symposium, Michigan State University, October.
Trask, Larry R. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Basque, Max W. Wheeler (ed.). Ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward. 2011. A Siberian link with Na-Dene languages. In The Dene-Yeniseian Connection, Jim Kari & Ben Potter (eds), 33–99. Fairbanks AK: ANLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 2005. The end of the Altaic controversy. Central Asiatic Journal 49(1): 71–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue