In:Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 1–23
Get fulltext
Chapter 1Farming/Language Dispersal
Food for thought
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.01rob
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.01rob
Article outline
- 1.Agriculture-driven language spread
- 2.Data and questions
- 3.Methods
- 3.1The diversity hotspot principle
- 3.2Phylolinguistics
- 3.3Mapping demographic dispersal on linguistic phylogeny
- 3.4Cultural reconstruction
- 3.4.1The accuracy of semantic reconstruction
- 3.4.2Lexical recycling
- 3.4.3The deception of a single item
- 3.4.4The shakiness of inferences made on the basis of absence
- 3.5Contact linguistics
- 3.5.1The distinction between borrowing and inheritance
- 3.5.2The directionality of the borrowing
- 4.Organization of this volume
- 5.Findings
Note References
References (48)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Amazonian Languages, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert Dixon (eds), 65–106. Cambridge: CUP.
Bellwood, Peter & Dizon, Eusebio. 2008. Austronesian cultural origins: Out of Taiwan, via the Batanes Islands, onwards to Western Polynesia. In Past Human Migrations in East Asia, Matching Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, Roger Blench, Malcolm Ross, Ilia Peiros & Marie Lin (eds), 23–39. London: Routledge.
Bellwood, Peter & Renfrew, Colin (eds). 2002. Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Blust, Robert. 1995. The prehistory of the Austronesian-speaking peoples: A view from language. Journal of World Prehistory 9: 453–510.
. 2013. The Austronesian Languages [Asia-Pacific Linguistics. Open Access Monographs]. Canberra: Australian National University.
Brown, Cecil. 2015. Paleobiolinguistics of New World crops and the Otomanguean language family. Ethnobiology letters 6(1): 189–191.
Brown, Cecil et al. 2013a. The paleobiolinguistics of domesticated chili pepper (Capsicum spp.). Ethnobiology Letters 4: 1–11.
2013b. The paleobiolinguistics of domesticated manioc (Manihot esculenta). Ethnobiology Letters 4: 61–70.
2014b. The paleobiolinguistics of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ethnobiology Letters 5: 104–115.
Comrie, Bernard. 2002. Farming dispersal in Europe and the spread of the Indo-European language family. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 409–420. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Diamond, Jared & Bellwood, Peter. 2003. Farmers and their languages: The first expansions. Science 300: 597–603.
Diffloth, Gérard. 2005. The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austroasiatic. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together the Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 77–80. London: Routledge Curzon.
Dunn, Michael. 2015. Language phylogenies. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 190–211. London: Routledge.
Ehret, Christopher. 2003. Language family expansions: Broadening our understandings of cause from an African perspective. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 373–400. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Epps, Patience. 2015. Historical linguistics and socio-cultural reconstruction. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 579–597. London: Routledge.
Fuller, Dorian. 2002. An agricultural perspective on Dravidian historical linguistics: Archaeological crop packages, livestock and Dravidian crop vocabulary. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 191–214. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Gray, Russell & Jordan, Fiona. 2000. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature: 1052–1055.
Gray, Russell & Atkinson, Quentin. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426: 435–439.
Gray, Russell, Drummond, Alexei & Greenhill, Simon. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323(5913): 479–483.
Heggarty, Paul. 2015. Prehistory through language and archaeology. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 598–626. London: Routledge.
Higham, Charles. 2002. Languages and farming dispersal: Austroasiatic languages and rice cultivation. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 223–232. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Hunn, Eugene & Brown, Cecil. 2011. Linguistic ethnobiology. In Ethnobiology, Anderson et al. (eds), 319–333. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Janhunen, Juha. 1996. Manchuria: An Ethnic History [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 222]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
Kaufman, Terence. 1990. Early Otomanguean homelands and cultures: Some premature hypotheses. University of Pittsburgh Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 91–136.
LaPolla, Randy. 2001. The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert Dixon (eds), 225–254. Oxford: OUP.
Militarev, Alexander. 2002. The prehistory of a dispersal: The Proto-Afrasian (Afroasiatic) farming lexicon. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 135–150. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Ostapirat, Weera. 2005. Kra-dai and Austronesians. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together the Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 107–131. London: Routledge Curzon.
Pawley, Andrew. 2002. The Austronesian dispersal: languages, technologies and people. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 251–274. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Philipson, David. 2002. Language and farming dispersals in sub-Saharan Africa, with particular reference to the Bantu-speaking peoples. In Examining the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 177–190. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Pictet, Adolphe. 1859. Les origines indo-européennes ou les aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique (première partie, seconde partie). Paris: Joël Cherbuliez.
Ratliff, Martha. 2004. Vocabulary of environment and subsistence in the Hmong-Mien protolanguage. In Hmong/Miao in Asia, Nicholas Tapp, Jean Michaud, Christian Culas & Gary Yia Lee (eds), 147–165. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origin. London: Jonathan Cape.
Sagart, Laurent. 2008. The vocabulary of cereal cultivation and the phylogeny of East Asian languages. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 23: 127–36.
Sapir, Edward. 1916. Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A Study in Method [Canada Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoir 90. Anthropological Series 13.] Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau.
Sidwell, Paul & Blench, Roger. 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: the Southeastern Riverine Hypothesis. In Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, Nick Enfield (ed.), 315–343. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Starostin, Sergei. 2005. Sino-Caucasian etymological database, <[URL]> (4 March 2017).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
