Cover not available

In:Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva M. Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 193–217

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 9
The simple emerging from the complex

Nominal number in Juba Arabic creole

 | Aarhus University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.09gol
Abstract
This chapter examines the system of nominal number in Juba Arabic. Its complexity is compared with its superstrate language, Sudanese Arabic, and its substrate, the Nilotic language Bari. It also compares its similarity with a number of creoles, Nilotic languages and Arabic dialects. Both Arabic and Nilotic languages are notorious for their complex systems of nominal number, making Juba Arabic an interesting case for the study of creole complexity. Following Bakker et al. (2011), I use computational phylogenetic tools to look at the linguistic similarity of the languages under examination. The findings show that Juba Arabic is simpler than its constrates, and that it is more similar to unrelated creoles than the languages from which it emerged.
Article outline
  • 9.1Introduction
  • 9.2Theoretical preliminaries
    • 9.2.1The Feature Pool Hypothesis
    • 9.2.2Creole distinctiveness
    • 9.2.3Hypotheses
  • 9.3Methodological preliminaries
    • 9.3.1Phylogenetic trees and linguistics
    • 9.3.2Sample
    • 9.3.3The data
  • 9.4The pool of features
    • 9.4.1Number affixing
    • 9.4.2Number and noun stems
    • 9.4.3Collectives
    • 9.4.4Other types of number inflection of nouns
    • 9.4.5Pronominal number
    • 9.4.6Number agreement
  • 9.5Phylogenetic analysis
  • 9.6Theoretical implications and questions for further research
  • 9.7Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (73)
References
Aboh, E. O. 2009. Competition and selection: that’s all! In Complex Processes in New Languages [Creole Language Library 35], E. O. Aboh & N. Smith (eds), 317–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars. Language Contact and Change [Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, T. 2014. Number in Dinka. In Number – Constructions and Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series 151], A. Storch & G. J. Dimmendaal (eds), 221–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U., Stephen, M. & Lim, L. 2007. Deconstructing Creole [Typological Studies in Language 73]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bizri, F. 2010. Pidgin Madame. Une grammaire de la servitude. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P. 2014. Creoles and typology: Problems of sampling and definition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2): 437–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P. & Daval-Markussen, A. 2014. Creole studies in the 21st century: A brief presentation of the special issue on creole languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal on Linguistics. 45(2): 141–150 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, P., Smith, N., Veenstra, T. 1994. Saramaccan. In Pidgin and Creole Languages: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 165–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergman, E. M. 2002. Spoken Sudanese Arabic: Grammar, Dialogues, and Glossary. Springfield VA: Dunwood Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhattacharjya, D. 2007. Nagamese. In Comparative Creole Syntax, J. Holm & P. L. Patrick (eds), 237–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boruah, B. K. 1993. Nagamese: The Language of Nagaland. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, D. & Moulton, V. 2004. NeighborNet, an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2): 255–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Korlai. In Comparative Creole Syntax, J. Holm & P. L. Patrick (eds), 153–174. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. 2002. Number. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowell, M. W. 1964. A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crazzolara, J. P. 1933. Outlines of a Nuer Grammar. Mödling bei Wien: Anthropos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniel, M. 2013. Plurality in independent personal pronouns. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). <[URL]> (25 November 2014).
Daval-Markussen, A. 2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 45(2): 274–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. J. 2002. Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42(2): 214–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Nilotic. In Encyclopedia Aethiopica. S. Uhlig (ed.), 1185–1186. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. 2013a. Definite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). <[URL]>
2013b. Indefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). <[URL]>
Dunn, M., Levinson, S. C., Terrill, A., Reesink, G. & Foley, R. A. 2005. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science. 309: 2072–2075 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, M., Levinson, S. C., Lindström, E., Reesink, G. & Terrill, A. 2008. Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: Methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia. Language. 84(4): 710–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dutton, T. E. & Voorhoeve, C. L. 1974. Beginning Hiri Motu [Pacific Linguistics D 24]. Canberra: ANU RSPAS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, W. 2002. A Grammar of Classical Arabic. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollis, A. C. 1905. The Masai: Their Language and Folklore. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huson, D. H. & David B. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljuba, N. V. 2013. Verbal number and suppletion. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). <[URL]>
Mahmud, U. A. 1983. Arabic in the Southern Sudan: History and Spread of a Pidgin-creole. Khartoum: FAL Advertising and Printing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manfredi, S. 2014. Qualche osservazione sull’espressione del plurale nominale nel creolo arabo di Juba. Ricognizioni. Rivista di lingue, Letterature e Culture Moderne 1(2): 53–61. <[URL]>
Manfredi, S. & Tosco, M. 2014. Arabic-based Pidgins and Creoles [Special issue of Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2)], S. Manfredi & M. Tosco (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language. 74(4): 788–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Tying up loose ends. Diachronica 28(1): 82–117 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27(1): 171–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H & Good, J. 2012. A Grammar of Saramaccan Creole. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath M. & Huber, M. (eds). 2013. The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. 2006. Juba Arabic. In Encyclopaedia of Arabic Language and Linguistic, K. Versteegh (ed.), 517–525. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. The relevance of Arabic-based pidgins and creoles. In Al-lugha, G. Mansur & M. Doss (eds). Cairo: Arab Development centre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Juba Arabic as a written language. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2): 352–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. & Manfredi, S. Forthcoming. Arabi Juba: Un pidgin-créole du Soudan du Sud. Louvain: Peeters.
Mitterrutzner, J. C. Dr. 1867. Die Sprache Der Bari in Central Afrika. Brixen: Verlag von A. Weger’s Buchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2000. Creolization is a social, not a structural process. In Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages [Creole Language Librrary 22], I. Neuman-Holzschuh & E. W. Schneider (eds), 65–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition, and Change. London: Continuum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, F. Dr. 1864. Die Sprache der Bari. Wien: Der Kais. Kön. Hof- und Staatdruckerei.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. & Smith, N. 1994. The study of pidgin and creole languages. In Pidgin and Creole Languages: An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], J. Arends, P. Muysken & N. Smith (eds), 3–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muysken, P. C., Smith, N., with Borges, R. D. 2015. Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 275]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Naess, U. G. 2008. ‘Gulf Pidgin Arabic’: Individual Strategies or a Structured Variety? A Study of Some Features of the Linguistic Behaviour of Asian Migrants in the Gulf Countries. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nebel, P. A. 1948. Dinka Grammar. Verona: Missioni Africane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neme, A. A. & Laporte, É. 2013. Pattern-and-root inflectional morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Language Sciences 40: 221–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nhial, A. A. J. 1975. Ki-Nubi and Juba Arabic: A comparative study. In Directions in Sudanese Linguistics and Folklore, S. H. Ḥurreiz & H. Bell (eds), 81–93 Khartoum: Institute of African and Asian Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, J. & Warnow, T. 2008. Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(5): 760–820. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owens, J. 2006. A Linguistic History of Arabic. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Creole Arabic: The orphan of all orphans. Anthropological Linguistics 43(3): 348–378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94], M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds), 265–285 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. & Goyette, S. Forthcoming. Principia Creolica.
Ryding, K. C. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spagnolo, Rev. Fr L. M. 1933. Bari Grammar. Verona: The Nigrizia Printing School Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sreedhar, M. V. 1985. Standardized Grammar of Naga Pidgin. Nasik: Cultural Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobler, J. S. 1983. The Grammar of Karipúna Creole. N.p.: Sociedade Internacional de Lingüística.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tosco, M. & Owens, J. 1993. Turku: A descriptive comparative study. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 14: 177–267Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N Dr. & Mpaayei, J. T. O. 1955. A Maasai Grammar. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, R. L. & Louis B. O. 1984. Juba Arabic for Beginners. Nairobi: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellens, I. 2005. An Arabic Creole in Africa: The Nubi Language of Uganda. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, J. F. 1999. Nuer Noun Morphology. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yokwe, E. M. 1987. The Tonal Grammar of Bari. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bakker, Peter
2025. Empiricism against imperialism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 40:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Blasi, Damian, Felicia Bisnath & Pui Yiu Szeto
2025. The study of Creole languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Approaches to Language Evolution, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue