Cover not available

In:Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 263–279

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 16
Between desire and necessity

The complementarity of want and need

 | Leiden University
Published online: 12 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.16roo
Abstract
In this paper, I relate three seemingly unrelated properties of the modal verb want that distinguish it from the semantically minimally different verb need. I show that these properties are determined by a single selectional characteristic that involves the evidential notions of perspective or evaluation. I argue that these notions must be configurationally represented, and that their properties can be couched in Binding theoretic principles. In addition, I show that uses of want expressing necessity and probability rather than desirability can be derived from this syntactic representation.
Article outline
  • 1.Three properties distinguishing need from want
    • 1.1Selection
    • 1.2Raising vs. control
    • 1.3Want as need/*need as want
    • 1.4Grammaticalization?
    • 1.5Towards an analysis
  • 2.A raising configuration for want and need
  • 3.The syntactic and semantic representation of want and need
  • 4.From desirability to apparent necessity
  • 5.From desirability to probability
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (14)
References
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 69–110. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1992. On the morphology of reflexives and impersonals. In Christine Laeufer and Terrell Morgan (eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics, LSRL XIX, 399–414. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. 2010. About the speaker: towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47. 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard, Marcel den Dikken & Peter Ludlow. 1996. Intensional ‘transitive’ verbs and concealed complement clauses. Rivista di linguistica 8. 29–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of sentential complementation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001a. State of the article: Evidentiality, part I. Glot International 5(4). 125–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. State of the article: Evidentiality, part II. Glot International 5(5). 161–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd. 2011. Dissolving Binding theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1976. To have have and to not have have. In M. Jazayery, E. Polomé, & W. Winter (eds), Linguistic and literary studies in honor of Archibald Hill, 263–270. Lisse: De Ridder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1984. Je veux partir – * Je veux que je parte. A propos de la distribution des complétives à temps fini et des compléments à l’infinitif en français. Cahiers de Grammaire 7. 76–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In A. di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

van Dooren, Annemarie
2024. Dutch willen’s steps towards a future marker. Nota Bene 1:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue