In:Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 193–205
Chapter 12Extending categorial grammar to phonology
Published online: 12 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.12van
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.12van
Abstract
What would be the implications of applying categorial grammar technology to phonological structure? We show how expressing phonological insights requires a few extensions into the formalism in order to be able to deal with autosegmentalism, with feature repulsion and with the interface with syntax (and possibly with semantics). It is argued that both our understanding of categorial grammar and phonology can profit from the confrontation.
Keywords: categorial grammar, phonology, autosegmentalism, formalism, representations
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A simple categorial system
- 3.Autosegmental categorial grammar
- 4.Feature repulsion
- 5.Interaction with morphosyntax
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (22)
Blom, Chris. 2012. Optional arguments in abstract categorial grammar. Utrecht University MSc thesis.
Clements, George N. & Samuel J. Keyser. 1983. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coleman, John. 2005. Phonological representations: Their names, forms and powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Everett, Daniel. 2016. An evaluation of universal grammar and the phonological mind. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 15.
Lambek, Joachim. 1958. The mathematics of sentence structure. American Mathematical Monthly 65. 154–170.
Levelt, Clara & Marc van Oostendorp (2007). Feature co-occurrence constraints in L1 acquisition. Linguistics in the Netherlands 24(1). 162–172.
Morrill, Glynn. 2010. Categorial grammar: Logical syntax, semantics, and processing. Oxford University Press.
Oostendorp, Marc van, 2007. Derived environment effects and consistency of exponence. In S. Blaho, P. Bye & M. Krämer (eds.), Freedom of Analysis?, 123–148. Mouton de Gruyter Berlin/New York.
. 2013. σ strikes back: A defense of headedness and constituency in phonology. The Linguistic Review 30(2). 347–371.
Oostendorp, Marc van, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.) 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Parker, Steve. 2011. Sonority. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1233–1255. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scobbie, James M. 1997. Autosegmental representation in a declarative constraint-based framework. New York: Garland.
Topintzi, Nina. 2011. Onsets. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1021–1054. Oxford: Blackwell.
Veer, Marijn van ’t. 2015. Building a phonological inventory: Feature co-occurrence constraints in acquisition. Utrecht: LOT.
