In:Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 177–189
Chapter 11Licensing distributivity
The role of plural morphology
Published online: 12 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.11dev
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.11dev
Abstract
This study investigates how the availability of quantificational distributivity depends on the morphosyntactic number of the VP, based on two different case studies: first, the behaviour of sentences with a group NP subject (such as the class or my family) in British English; and second, the interpretation of coordinated VPs in sentences like The guests are surrounding the newlyweds and singing or dancing. I argue that distributivity is only available when the VP is plural, not when it is singular or uninflected. This approach goes back to Link’s (1983) original intuition that pluralisation and distributivity are two sides of the same coin. It also provides support for compositional analyses of semantic pluralisation, according to which predicates originate as singular and are pluralised at a higher derivational level, instead of being “born plural” as in e.g. Krifka (1992), Landman (1996), and Kratzer (2008).
Keywords: distributivity, plurality, group nouns, British English
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some preliminaries
- 3.The role of VP number in licensing distributivity: British English group NPs
- 4.Pluralisation as the semantic correlate of number inflection: The (im)possibility of atom/set coordination
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (25)
Barker, Chris. 1992. Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics 9(1). 69–93.
Bartsch, Renate. 1973. The semantics and syntax of number and numbers. Syntax and Semantics 2. 51–93.
Dowty, David. 1987. Collective predicates, distributive predicates, and all
. Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL. 97–115.
Geenhoven, Veerle van. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford: CSLI Publishing.
Hoeksema, Jack. 1983. Plurality and conjunction. In Alice ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in modeltheoretic semantics. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2008. On the plurality of verbs. In Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matter. Stanford: CSLI.
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 1984. Hydras. On the logic of relative constructions with multiple heads. In Fred Landman & Frank Veltman (eds.), Varieties of formal semantics. Dordrecht: Foris.
Scha, Remko. 1981. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantication. In Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof & Theo Janssen (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1998. Reciprocity and cumulative quantication. Natural Language Semantics 6. 303–337.
Vries, Hanna de. 2013. Distributivity and agreement: New evidence for groups as sets. In Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 241–248.
. 2014. Lexical distributivity with group nouns and property indefinites. In Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 43, 91–102.
. 2015. Shifting sets, hidden atoms: the semantics of distributivity, plurality and animacy. Utrecht University dissertation.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
