In:Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 333–348
The shift of the role of early intervention in the study of dyslexia
Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.20van
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.20van
To be diagnosed as a specific learning disorder, the influence of ineffective instruction has to be excluded in dyslexia. Because the quality of ‘instruction-as-usual’ shows great variation, early intervention has been advocated as a tool to study dyslexia. There are two contrasting views. The first view is that early intervention sheds light on the causal relationship between targeted cognitive precursors and dyslexia. In contrast, the response-to-intervention approach (RTI) advocates that intervention is a way to exclude poor instruction as a cause of dyslexia. Family risk intervention studies are described as exponent of the first approach, followed by some examples of RTI. It is concluded that the cause-excluding approach is more supported by the evidence than the cause-supporting view.
Keywords: dyslexia, family risk, reading failure, RTI, early intervention, early identification
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dyslexia as an exclusive phenomenon
- 3.From standard instruction to response to intervention
- 4.Early intervention and the cause of dyslexia
- 5.Early intervention studies in familial risk samples
- 6.Early intervention studies and the exclusion of the environment as the cause of dyslexia
- 7.Dyslexia as the endproduct of RTI
- 8.Combining RTI en FR: An example
- 9.Conclusions
References
References (50)
Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). To wait in Tier 1 or to intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11–27.
Blomert, L. (2011). The neural signature of orthographic–phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. NeuroImage, 57, 695–703.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–667.
DSM-5. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Duff, F., Hulme, C., Grainger, K., Hardwick, S. J., Miles, J. N., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). Reading and language intervention for children at risk of dyslexia: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1234–1243.
Dutch Inpectorate. (2007). De staat van het onderwijs [The state of education]. Onderwijsverslag 2005–2006. Utrecht: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D. K. (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training. An intervention study with children at risk of dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660–670.
Eleveld, M. A. (2005). At risk for dyslexia. The role of phonological abilities, letter knowledge, and speed of serial naming in early intervention and diagnosis. State University Groningen, the Netherlands (PhD-thesis). Leuven: Garant Publishers.
Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Purdie, N. (2003). Early intervention in the home for children at risk of reading failure. Support for Learning, 18, 77–82.
Fletcher, J. M. (2006). The need for respone to instruction models for learning disabilities. Perspectives. The International Dyslexia Association, 12–15.
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55.
Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203.
Gersons-Wolfensberger, D. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. (1997). Definition and treatment of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 209–213.
Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 338–358.
Hindson, B. A., Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Newman, C., Hine, D. W., & Shankweiler, D. P. (2005). Assesment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (4), 687–704.
Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length effect on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140–149.
McDonald Connor, C., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E. C., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1408–1419.
NICHD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An Evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413.
Regtvoort, A.G.F.M., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Early intervention with children of dyslexic parents: Effects of computer-based reading instruction at home on literacy acquisition. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 35–53.
Regtvoort, A., Zijlstra, H., & van der Leij, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a two-year supplementary tutor-assisted computerized intervention on the reading development of beginning readers at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Dyslexia, 19, 256–280.
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82(3), 1013–1028.
Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeney, J. M. (2005). Severe reading difficulties - can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 13(4), 209–227.
Scheltinga, F., van der Leij, A., & Struiksma, A. J. C. (2010). Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 212–228.
Snowling, M. J., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2016). Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 498–545.
Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(2), 217–235.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
. (1994). Are discrepancy-based definitions of dyslexia empirically defensible? In K. P. Van den Bos, L. S. Siegel, D. J. Bakker, & D. L. Share (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 15–30). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Struiksma, A. J. C., van der Leij, A., & Stoel, R. (2009). Response to fluency-oriented intervention of Dutch poor readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 541–548.
Swagerman, S. C., van Bergen, E., Dolan, C., de Geus, E. J., Koenis, M. M., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Boomsma, D. I. (2015). Genetic transmission of reading ability. Brain & Language.
Tannock, R. (2013). Rethinking ADHD and LD in DSM-5 : Proposed changes in diagnostic criteria. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 5–25.
Tijms, J. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-based treatment for dyslexia in a clinical care setting: Outcomes and moderators. Educational Psychology, 31(7), 873–896.
Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Recent discoveries from research on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–537). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58.
Tunmer, W. E., Chapman, J. W., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., & Arrow, A. W. (2013). Why the New Zealand National Literacy Strategy has failed and what can be done about it: Evidence from the progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2011 and Reading Recovery monitoring reports. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 18(2), 139–180.
van Bergen, E., van der Leij, A., & de Jong, P. F. (2014). The intergenerational multiple deficit model and the case of dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(article 346), 1–13.
van der Leij, A. (2013). Dyslexia and early intervention: What did we learn from the Dutch Dyslexia Programme? Dyslexia, 19, 241–255.
van der Leij, A., & van Daal, V. (1999). Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitation in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 417–428.
van Otterloo, S. G., & van der Leij, A. (2009). Dutch home-based pre-reading intervention with children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 169–195.
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Veldkamp, E. (2006). Treatment integrity in a home-based pre-reading intervention programme. Dyslexia, 12, 155–176.
van Otterloo, S. G., van der Leij, A., & Henrichs, L. F. (2009). Early home-based intervention in the Netherlands for children at familial risk of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 15, 187–217.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading & Writing, 21, 437–480.
Verhoeven, L., & Keuning, J. (2014). Onderkenning van dyslexie [Identification of dyslexia]. In L. Verhoeven, P. F. De Jong, & F. Wijnen (Red.), Dyslexie 2.0 (pp. 19–36). Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
Willems, G., Poelmans, H., Richardson, U., & Blomert, L. (2008). Evaluatie van een voorschoolse training van kinderen met risico voor dyslexie [Evaluation of a preschool training of children with risk of dyslexia]. In L. Verhoeven & H. Wentink (Red.), Onderkenning en aanpak van leesproblemen en dyslexie [Identification and remedy of reading difficulties and dyslexia] (pp. 99–116). Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
Wolff, U. (2011). Effects of a randomized reading intervention study: An application of structural equation modeling. Dyslexia, 17(4), 295–311.