In:Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 119–135
The development of Hebrew conjunct constructions in narration
Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.08rav
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.08rav
The current chapter describes a psycholinguistic study of the development of conjunct constructions, a multi-functional coordinated syntactic structure that lies at the heart of complex Hebrew syntax, which can express variegated content in syntactically complex structures. Conjunct constructions in narratives written by 150 Hebrew-speaking children, adolescents and adults were analyzed in terms of syntactic structure and function, lexical semantics, and discourse functions. Results indicate that this construction emerges as a simplex event-telling form, gaining in complexity and fulfilling more functions with age and schooling level, with a concomitant increase in the interface with other forms of complex syntax. The chapter concludes with an illustration of these developments in two narratives and a discussion of the role of language-specific constructions in language acquisition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Syntactic development
- 1.2Complex syntactic constructions
- 1.3Conjunct constructions
- 1.4The current study
- 2.Method
- 2.1Quantitative and qualitative analyses
- 2.2Levels on the scale
- 3.Results
- 3.1Text size
- 3.2C-constructions
- 4.Discussion
References
References (64)
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berman, R. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191–219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
. (2005). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (in press). Development of complex syntax: From early clause-combining to text- embedded syntactic packaging. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of language disorders. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berman, R. A., & Lustigman, L. (2014). Emergent clause-combining in adult-child interactional contexts. In I. Arnon, M. Tice, C. Kurumada, & B. Estigarribia (Eds.), Language in interaction (pp. 281–300) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In J. Guo, et al. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149–162). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Berman, R. A., & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2010). Interpretation and recall of proverbs in three pre-adolescent populations. First Language, 30, 155–173.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Crosslinguistic perspectives on developing text- production abilities in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 1–44.
Berman, R. A., Nayditz, R., & Ravid, D. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language and Literacy, 14, 161–187.
Blakemore, S-J., Brandt, S., & Kidd, E. (2011). Relative clause acquisition and representation: Evidence from spontaneous speech, sentence repetition, and comprehension. In D. Schoenefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence – discussing and extending the methodological tool-kit of the linguist (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brandes, G., & Ravid, D. (2016). Prepositional phrases as manner adverbials in the development of Hebrew L1 text production. In L. Ortega, A. E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 55–74. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bybee, J., & Noonan, M. (Eds.). (2001). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carroll, R., & Ruigendijk, E. (2013). The interaction of speech intelligibility and syntactic complexity. Processing speech in noise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 139–159.
Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296–312.
Colston, H. L., & Kuiper, M. S. (2002). Figurative language development research and popular children’s literature: why we should know, “where the wild things are”. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 27–43.
Costa, J., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Children acquire unaccusatives and A-movement very early. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, & T. Siloni (Eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface (pp. 354–378). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W. (2010). Parataxis and simpler syntax. In M-J. Béguelin,M. Avanzi, & G. Corminboeuf (Eds.), Actes du 1er Colloque International de Macrosyntaxe, Vol. 2. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Dasinger, L., & Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In R. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 457–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Moore, J. (2013). The linguistic challenges of learning across academic disciplines. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 302–322). New York: Guilford Press.
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., DiNubila, J. A., & Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition, 100, B10–B20.
Friedmann, N., Aram, D., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Definitions as a window to the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 687–710.
Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315.
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219–224.
Hauser, A. J. (1980). Judges 5: Parataxis in Hebrew poetry. Journal of Biblical Literature, 99, 23–41.
Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hebert, M., Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26, 111–138.
Hershkovitz, L. (2014). Conjunct constructions in written narratives across adolescence. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew]
Jisa, H., & Kern, S. (1998). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative texts. Journal of Child Language, 25, 623–652.
Jisa, H., & Tolchinsky, L. (2009). Developing a depersonalised discourse stance in typologically different languages: Written expository texts. Written Language and Literacy, 12, 1–25.
Kärkkäinen, E., Sorjonen, M-L., & Helasvuo, M-L. (2007). Discourse structure. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 301–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184.
Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 287–309.
Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 788–799.
Nippold, M. A., & Scott, C. M. (Eds.). (2009). Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: development and disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. R., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Syntactic development in adolescents with a history of language impairments: A follow-up investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 241–251.
Nir, B., & Berman, R. A. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 744–765.
Noble, C., Lieven, E., Iqbal, F., & Theakston, A. (2015). Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 811–842.
Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in written expository texts: Evidence from later language acquisition. In D. Ravid & H. B-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 337–355). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. (2013). Syntactic complexity in discourse production across different text types. In C. Bolly & L. Degand (Eds.), Across the line of speech and writing variation. Corpora and language in use (pp. 51–66). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2006). Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew. Discourse Processes, 41 (2), 117–149.
. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school-age: A text- embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26.
Ravid, D., & Chen-Djemal, Y. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language and Literacy, 18, 56–81.
Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Adjectives in the development of text production: Lexical, morphological and syntactic analyses. First Language, 30, 27–55.
Ravid, D., & Saban, R. (2008). Syntactic and meta-syntactic skills in the school years: A developmental study in Hebrew. In I. Kupferberg &A. Stavans (Eds.), Language education in Israel: Papers in honor of Elite Olshtain (pp. 75–110). Jerusalem: Magnes Press.
Ravid, D., & Zilberbuch, S. (2003). Morpho-syntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew text production. Journal of Child Language, 30, 395–418.
Ravid, D., van Hell, J., Rosado, E., & Zamora, A. (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 69–94.
Rowland, C., & Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: The modals and DO. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1471–1492.
Schuele, C. M. (2013). Beyond 14 grammatical morphemes: Toward a broader view of grammatical development. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 118–124.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2012). Linguistic processing in Hebrew-speaking children from low and high SES backgrounds. Reading & Writing, 25, 1427–1448.
Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1985–1995). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theakston, A. L., & Rowland, C. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: Auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1449–1470.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ben-Zvi, Galit, Hadass Landau & Dorit Ravid
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
