Cover not available

In:Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 119135

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (64)
References
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bendavid, A. (1967). Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew grammar. Tel Aviv: Dvir [in Hebrew].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191–219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (in press). Development of complex syntax: From early clause-combining to text- embedded syntactic packaging. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of language disorders. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berman, R. A., & Lustigman, L. (2014). Emergent clause-combining in adult-child interactional contexts. In I. Arnon, M. Tice, C. Kurumada, & B. Estigarribia (Eds.), Language in interaction (pp. 281–300) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In J. Guo, et al. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149–162). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 92–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Interpretation and recall of proverbs in three pre-adolescent populations. First Language, 30, 155–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., Nayditz, R., & Ravid, D. (2011). Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations. Written Language and Literacy, 14, 161–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, S-J., Brandt, S., & Kidd, E. (2011). Relative clause acquisition and representation: Evidence from spontaneous speech, sentence repetition, and comprehension. In D. Schoenefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence – discussing and extending the methodological tool-kit of the linguist (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandes, G., & Ravid, D. (2016). Prepositional phrases as manner adverbials in the development of Hebrew L1 text production. In L. Ortega, A. E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 55–74. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Noonan, M. (Eds.). (2001). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, R., & Ruigendijk, E. (2013). The interaction of speech intelligibility and syntactic complexity. Processing speech in noise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 139–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 296–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Kuiper, M. S. (2002). Figurative language development research and popular children’s literature: why we should know, “where the wild things are”. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, J., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Children acquire unaccusatives and A-movement very early. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, & T. Siloni (Eds.), The theta system: Argument structure at the interface (pp. 354–378). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. (2010). Parataxis and simpler syntax. In M-J. Béguelin,M. Avanzi, & G. Corminboeuf (Eds.), Actes du 1er Colloque International de Macrosyntaxe, Vol. 2. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dasinger, L., & Toupin, C. (1994). The development of relative clause functions in narrative. In R. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 457–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Moore, J. (2013). The linguistic challenges of learning across academic disciplines. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 302–322). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., DiNubila, J. A., & Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition, 100, B10–B20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., Aram, D., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Definitions as a window to the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 687–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303–1315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, A. J. (1980). Judges 5: Parataxis in Hebrew poetry. Journal of Biblical Literature, 99, 23–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hebert, M., Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26, 111–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, L. (2014). Conjunct constructions in written narratives across adolescence. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew]
Jisa, H., & Kern, S. (1998). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative texts. Journal of Child Language, 25, 623–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E., Sorjonen, M-L., & Helasvuo, M-L. (2007). Discourse structure. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol II: Complex constructions (pp. 301–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring written language ability in narrative samples. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 287–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 788–799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Scott, C. M. (Eds.). (2009). Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: development and disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. R., Billow, J. L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2008). Syntactic development in adolescents with a history of language impairments: A follow-up investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 241–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, B., & Berman, R. A. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 744–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noble, C., Lieven, E., Iqbal, F., & Theakston, A. (2015). Converging and competing cues in the acquisition of syntactic structures: The conjoined agent intransitive. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 811–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in written expository texts: Evidence from later language acquisition. In D. Ravid & H. B-Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 337–355). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Syntactic complexity in discourse production across different text types. In C. Bolly & L. Degand (Eds.), Across the line of speech and writing variation. Corpora and language in use (pp. 51–66). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2006). Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew. Discourse Processes, 41 (2), 117–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school-age: A text- embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Chen-Djemal, Y. (2015). Spoken and written narration in Hebrew: A case study. Written Language and Literacy, 18, 56–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Levie, R. (2010). Adjectives in the development of text production: Lexical, morphological and syntactic analyses. First Language, 30, 27–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Saban, R. (2008). Syntactic and meta-syntactic skills in the school years: A developmental study in Hebrew. In I. Kupferberg &A. Stavans (Eds.), Language education in Israel: Papers in honor of Elite Olshtain (pp. 75–110). Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Zilberbuch, S. (2003). Morpho-syntactic constructs in the development of spoken and written Hebrew text production. Journal of Child Language, 30, 395–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., van Hell, J., Rosado, E., & Zamora, A. (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 69–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, C., & Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: The modals and DO. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1471–1492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuele, C. M. (2013). Beyond 14 grammatical morphemes: Toward a broader view of grammatical development. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 118–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2012). Linguistic processing in Hebrew-speaking children from low and high SES backgrounds. Reading & Writing, 25, 1427–1448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1985–1995). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., & Rowland, C. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: A longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: Auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 1449–1470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theakston, A., Ibbotson, P., Freudenthal, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Productivity of noun slots in verb frames. Cognitive Science, 39, 1369–1395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ben-Zvi, Galit, Hadass Landau & Dorit Ravid
2025. A developmental study of Hebrew text reconstruction: The role of passive voice in different genres. First Language 45:4  pp. 496 ff. DOI logo
Zwilling, Racheli & Dorit Ravid
2025. Later lexical development in Hebrew peer talk. Frontiers in Language Sciences 4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue