Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (38)
References
Bates, L., Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to student writing. Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D.R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N.H., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, U. (1987). Argumentative patterns. In U. Connor & R.B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 57–72). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskey, D.E. (1983). Meanwhile, back in the real world…: Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 315–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 93–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R. (1993). The design and implementation of an automatic analysis program for L2 text research: Necessity and feasibility. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 119–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994a). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994b). Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native speakers. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 45–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995a). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors? CATESOL Journal, 8, 41–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms, TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995c). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal 4(4), 18–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002/2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Response to student writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?) Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Reflections of a blue-collar linguist. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan (pp. 91–101). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Myth 5: Students must learn to correct all their writing errors. In Reid (Ed.) (pp. 90–114).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M.E.A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: What teachers say and what they do. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 207–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R., Liu, H., & Rabie, B. (2011). “The job of teaching writing”: Teacher views of responding to writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 3(1), 39–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R., & Hedgcock, J.S. (1998/2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R., & Roberts, B.J. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedgcock, J.S., & Ferris, D.R. (2009). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. (1986). Process not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 141–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuda, P.K. (2003). Second-language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of Second language writing (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patthey-Chavez, G.G., & Ferris, D.R. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 51–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saragi, T., Nation, I.S.P., & Meister, G.F. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading.System 6(2), 72–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing iasses”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue