In:Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 89–118
Sidesteps towards applied linguistics
In Search of a Career
Published online: 3 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.203.04ske
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.203.04ske
References (69)
Aston, G. (1986). Trouble shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128–143.
Bui, X.G. (2010). Exploring task-internal and task-external readiness: The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning and proficiency levels. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 63–94).
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. London: Longman.
Bygate, M., Tonkyn, A. & Williams, E. (1994). Grammar and the language teacher. London: Prentice Hall.
Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 5–22). London: Prentice Hall.
Carpenter, H. (2008). A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of different aptitudes for L2 grammar in learners equated for proficiency level. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch.
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review (Centre for Second Language Classroom Research: Technical Report No. 6). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383.
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20.
. (2005a). (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language (Language Learning & Language Teaching 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2005b). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In Ellis (Ed.) (pp. 3–34).
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A.S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer-assistance in secondary language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
. (1999). The effect of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 185–215.
. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency investigating complexity, Accuracy and fluency in SLA (Language Learning & Language Teaching 32) (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (2013). The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249–273.
Johns, T.F., & Dudley-Evans, A. (1979). An experiment in team-teaching of overseas postgraduate students of transportation and plant biology. In E. Smythe (Ed.), Team teaching in ESP (ELTDOCs 106). London: The British Council.
Li, Qian. (2010). Focus on form in task based language teaching: Exploring the effects of post-task activities and task practice on learners’ oral performance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
. (2014). Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners’ oral performance. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 129–154).
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. (pp. 123–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Luo, S. (2007). Re-examining factors that affect task difficulty in task-based language assessment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empiricial study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83–108.
Norris, J., Brown, J.D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J. (1998). Designing second language performance assessments (Technical Report No. 18). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.
Pang, F. & Skehan, P. (2014). Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 95–128).
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robertson, F. (1988). Airspeak – Radiotelephony communication for pilots. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (Task-based Language Teaching 2) (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (1980a). Memory, language aptitude, and second language performance. Polyglot, 2(Fiche 3).
. (1980b). Language aptitude: A review. English Language Research Journal, 1. University of Birmingham.
. (1980c). Team teaching and the role of the ESP teacher. In G. Greenall & J.E. Price (Eds.), Study modes and academic development of overseas students. ELTDOCs: The British Council.
. (1981). ESP teachers, computers, and research. In J. Higgins (Ed.), Computers in EAP (ELTDOCs). London: The British Council.
. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
. (1992). Strategies in second language acquisition (Thames Valley University Working Papers in English Language Teaching, No.1). London: Thames Valley University.
. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62.
. (2004). Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 16(5), 391–411
. (2007). Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Form-meaning relationships in language pedagogy: Essays in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2009a). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D.D. Malvern, & P. Meara (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
. (2009b). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 211–260).
. (Ed.). (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance (Task-based Language Teaching 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2011). The task is not enough: Conceptualisation, rehearsal, and monitoring in task based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187.
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language learning ability (Working Documents No. 8). London: ESOL Department, Insitute of Education, London University.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 215–247.
. (1999). Task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120.
. (2005). Pre-task and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-based performance in a second Language (Language Learning & Language Teaching 11) (pp. 193– 216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (Eds.). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning, and teaching. Brussels: University of Brussels Press.
Skehan, P., & Henderson, W. (1979). The team teaching of introductory economics to overseas students. In E. Smyth (Ed.). Team teaching (ELTDOCs) London: The British Council.
Skehan, P., & Shum, S. (2014). Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 187–210).
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, (pp. 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, Z. (2009). Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P. (2014). Structure, lexis, and time perspective: Influences on task performance. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. 155–186.