Cover not available

In:The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 289–334

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10. The simple present and the expression of temporality in L1 English and L2 English oral narratives

When form meets discourse

 | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Published online: 9 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.10vra
The simple/progressive aspectual contrast is fundamental in present-based narratives in English: the simple present encodes temporally sequenced events whereas the progressive creates a close-up effect and introduces a perspective “from within”, often associated with the subjective viewpoint of the narrator (Chuquet 1994). This dichotomy is, nonetheless, cancelled in certain types of oral narratives, such as the narrative commentaries, where the simple present has been shown to take over some of the functional-semantic scope of the progressive form (Williams 2002). On the basis of a corpus of 12 L1 English and 12 L2 English oral narratives elicited by means of a picture book, we show that the simple present is used as a default form in L1 English narratives, irrespective of the narrative function of the predicate or of its inherent semantic properties. In L2 English, the advanced French-speaking learners differ from the English native speakers in their choice of temporal linkage, which favors the use of the progressive form, and struggle to construct a cohesive temporal perspective in their stories. This indicates that discourse use of tense-aspect morphology remains a challenge for advanced learners, in part because it is informed by information selection patterns embedded in the learners’ L1.
References (64)
References
Andersen, R.W. 1983. Transfer to somewhere. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S.M. Gass & L. Selinker (eds), 177–201. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Progression and Regression in Language. Sociocultural, Neuropsychological and Linguistic Perspectives. K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (eds), 309–339. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Salaberry, R. 2008. Acquisition of English tense-aspect morphology by advanced French instructed learners. Language Learning 58(3): 555–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. & Marchman, V. 1991. Binding and unfolding: Towards the linguistic construction of narrative discourse. Discourse Processes 14: 277–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learners’ narrative. Pragmatics and Language Learning 3: 144–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect. Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Analyzing aspect. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology, R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Text to task. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 219–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A. 1996. Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and FFL. The Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes 52(2): 308–330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W. 1995. The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29(1): 107–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Slobin, D.I. (eds). 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-linguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P.M. 2000. The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Ö. Dahl (ed.), 559–604. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, R.I. 2008. Aspect and aspectuality. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 224–268. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticized knowledge. A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities. Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds), 54–73. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuquet, H. 1994. Le présent de narration en anglais et en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, L. 2002. The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning 52(1): 43–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The particulars on universals: a comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 61(2): 251–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comajoan, L. 2013. Defining and coding data: Narrative discourse grounding in L2 studies. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 309–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowper, E. 1998. The simple present tense in English: A unified treatment. Studia Linguistica 52(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curell, H. 2002. The temporal interpretation of narratives: A case study. In Linguistics on the Way into the Third Millennium. Proceedings of the 34th Linguistics Colloquium, Germersheim 1999, R. Rapp (ed.), 591–598. London: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1985. Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, R. 1979. Aspects and bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics 17: 761–794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, I. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dry, H. 1992. Foregrounding: An assessment. In Language in Context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre, S.J. Hwang & W.R. Merrifield (eds), 435–450. Arlington TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldschnieder, J.M. & DeKeyser, R. 2001. Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 55 (Supplement 1): 26–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirtle, W.H. 1988. Events, time and the simple form. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 17(1): 85–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 213–241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A. 2002. The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27], R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 155–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H. & Rohrer, C. 1983. Tense in texts. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 250–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. 1997. The basic variety (or couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13: 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachaux, F. 2005. La périphrase être en train de, perspective interlinguale (anglais-français): une modalisation de l’aspect? In Les périphrases verbales, H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot & N. Le Querler (eds), 119–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, M. 1997. En route vers le bilinguisme. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 9: 147–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. & Asher, N. 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relation and common sense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. 2007. L’influence de la L1 dans l’organisation des discours chez les apprenants avancés/quasi-bilingues: Le cas de l’aspect ‘en déroulement’ en français et en anglais. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris 8, Vincennes Saint Denis.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.J. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Press.
Michaelis, L.A. 2008. Tense in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 220–243. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. & Gilabert, R. 2011. More evidence concerning the Aspect Hypothesis: The acquisition of English progressive aspect by Catalan-Spanish instructed learners. IRAL 49(3): 241–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakhimovsky, A. 1988. Aspect, aspectual class, and the temporal structure of narrative. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 29–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noyau, C., Lorenzo de, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Espinar Sanz, G. and Schneider, R. 2005. Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: Granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, B. H. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3): 243–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, M. 2002. Les relacions temporals i aspectuals. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol.3, J. Solà, M.-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2567–2662. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1984. Principles of Gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative Texts. Linguistics 22: 779–809.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robison, R.E. 1995. The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16.3: 344–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. The primacy of aspect. Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 315–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohde, A. 1996. The Aspect Hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34: 1115–1137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. 2011. Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2): 184–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. & Comajoan, L. (eds). 2013. Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. & Flecken, M. 2008. Aspectual concepts across languages: Some considerations for second language learning. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, S. de Knop & T. de Rycker (eds), 357–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1996. From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. 2003. Linguistic structure and information organization: The case of very advanced learners. In EUROSLA Yearbook, Vol. 3, S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (eds), 183–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M. 2006. The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities. Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment, H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds), 40–53. Washington DC : Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. In Linguistics and Philosophy, Z. Vendler (ed.), 97–121. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vraciu, E.A. 2012. Tense-aspect Morphology in the Advanced L2 English Variety: Exploring Semantic, Discourse and Cross-linguistic Factors. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense.
Williams, C. 2002. Non-progressive aspect in English in commentaries and demonstrations using the present tense. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1235–1256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. 1982. CHP. The Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Latkowska, Jolanta
2024. Temporal progression in film retellings in Polish: Perspectives on the interaction of the imperfective aspect and narrative principles. Studies in Polish Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Liao, Yiyun, Katinka Dijkstra & Rolf A. Zwaan
2023. Linguistic and non-linguistic cues in motion event endpoint description: The selection between English to and towards. Memory & Cognition 51:4 ► pp. 982 ff. DOI logo
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2020. Aspectual contrasts in the Englishpresent tense revisited. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue