In:The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 185–214
Chapter 7. L2 acquisition of English aspect by L1 Arabic speakers
The role of interpretable features at the syntax-semantics interface
Published online: 9 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.07alt
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.07alt
This chapter reports on a study that investigates whether L1 Arabic speakers can acquire the English aspectual contrast between the present simple (e.g. ‘plays’) and present progressive (e.g. ‘is playing’). The study was conducted with 143 Saudi Arabic college students of English and eleven native speakers. Following their performance on a cloze test, the L2 learners were assigned to four proficiency levels (beginners, low intermediate, high intermediate, and advanced). They then completed a bimodal timed aspectual interpretation task with 36 short stories (12 progressive, 12 habitual, and 12 fillers) by choosing the sentence with the verb form that best described the story context. Results show that Arabic L2 learners across proficiency levels have successfully learned the tested aspectual contrast. They did not overgeneralize the present simple to progressive and habitual contexts as in L1 Arabic. These results suggest that the interpretive properties of progressive aspect in English are unproblematic for L1 Arabic learners.
References (47)
Adger, D. & Ramchand, G. 2005. Merge and Move: Wh-depencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 161–193.
Al-Thubaiti, K. 2007. Age Effects on the Ultimate Attainment of Proficient Arabic Speakers of English. MRes dissertation, Department of Language and Linguistics, Essex University.
Ayoun, D. 2005. The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (eds), 79–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect, Mood and Modality [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J. 2013. Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal-aspectual-mood systems. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, M. R. Salaberry & Ll. Comajoan (eds), 119–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(4): 657–689.
Benmamoun, E. 2000. The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. Oxford: OUP.
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Research on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Déchaine, R.-M. & Manfredi, V. 2000. Interpreting null tense. Paper presented at the Roundtable on the Syntax of Tense and Aspect, University of Paris.
Fassi-Fehri, A. 2004. Temporal/aspectual interaction and variation across Arabic heights. In The Syntax of Time, J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds), 235–257. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hawkins, R. 2000. Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34: 75–90.
Hawkins, R., Casillas, G., Hattori, H., Hawthorne, J., Husted, R., Lozano, C., Okamoto, A., Thomas, E. & Yamada, K. 2008. The semantic effects of verb raising and its consequences in second language grammars. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. M. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 328–351. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hawkins, R. & Hattori, H. 2006. Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22(3): 269–301.
Ionin, T. & Montrul, S. 2009. Article use and generic reference: Parallels between L1 and L2 acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 49], M. del Pilar García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (eds), 147–173 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (ed.), 102–129. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Lasnik, H. 2007. Verbal morphology: Syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings, Ž. Bošković & H. Lasnik (eds), 263–277. Oxford: Blackwell.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liszka, S. A. 2009. Associating meaning to form in advanced L2 speakers. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lozano, C. 2006. Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations and unaccusativity in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research 22(2): 145–187.
. 2009. Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K. I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Montrul, S., Foote, R. & Perpiñán, S. 2008. Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning 58(3): 503–553.
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. 2003. Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(3): 351–398.
Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E. 2001. I to C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale, a Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 355–426. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000a. Accounting for morphological variation in second language acquisition: Truncation or missing inflection? In The Acquisition of Syntax, M.-A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (eds), 202–235. London: Longman.
. 2000b. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133.
Rouveret, A. 2012. VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(3): 897–963.
Rubin, A.D. 2004. Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (eds), 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–72.
Slabakova, R. 2001. Telicity in the Second Language [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2003. Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research 19(1): 42–75.
Sorace, A. 1993. Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research 9(1): 22–47.
. 2005. Syntactic optionality at interfaces. In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265] L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds), 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22(3): 339–368.
Towell, R. & Hawkins, R. 1994. Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M. 2007. The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23(2): 215–242.
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Sorace, A. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–664. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Travis, L. 2008. The role of features in syntactic theory and language variation. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 22–47. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
White, L. 2003. Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(2): 129–141.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
SHKURENKO, Anastasiia & Filiz CELE
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
Dudley, Amber & Roumyana Slabakova
2020. Aspectual contrasts in the Englishpresent tense revisited. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Al-Thubaiti, Kholoud A
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
