In:The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 1–20
Chapter 1. The development of third person singular present form -s
Verb semantics or input frequency?
Published online: 9 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.01wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.01wan
Addressing two hypotheses, the Aspect Hypothesis (Andersen & Shirai 1994; Shirai & Andersen 1995) and the Verb-Island Hypothesis (Tomasello 1992), this study analyzed whether the acquisition of third person singular present -s (3S) follows the same path as other tense-aspect markers, such as -ing, past, whose acquisition is influenced by the verb semantic properties, or its acquisition is affected more by input frequency. The present study analyzed three children’s longitudinal data from CHILDES database (MacWhinney 2000) and investigated the developmental characteristics of 3S from three perspectives: the percentage of 3S co-occurring with stative verbs, the frequency correlation of mother’s input and child’s production, and the data comparison with the past tense marker. The results show that the children’s acquisition of semantically motivated morphemes, (i.e. past tense), was more affected by verb semantic properties than input frequency, supporting the Aspect Hypothesis. However, the acquisition of formally motivated features (i.e. 3S), was more affected by input frequency, supporting the Verb-Island Hypothesis.
References (36)
Ambridge, B., Kidd, E.J., Rowland, C.F. & Theakston, A.L. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language. Journal of Child Language 42: 239–273.
Andersen, R.W. 1986. The need for native language comparison data in interpreting second language data. Forum Lecture, 1986 TESOL Summer Institute, University of Hawai'i at Ma'noa.
. 1990. Models, processes, principles, and strategies: Second language acquisition in and out of the classroom. In Second Language Acquisition – Foreign Language Learning, B. VanPatten & J.F. Lee (eds), 45–78. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133–156.
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. 1996. Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. 1976. How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3: 167–189.
Berman, R.A. & Dromi, E. 1984. On marking time without aspect in child language. Papers & Reports on Child Language Development 23: 23–32.
Behrens, H. 1993. Temporal Reference in German Child Language: Form and Function of Early Verb Use. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. 1980. Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56: 386–412.
Bloom, L., Merkin, W. & Wootten, J. 1982. Wh-questions: Linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition. Child Development 53: 1084–1092.
Bowerman, M. 1976. Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In Directions in Normal and Deficient Child Language, D. Morehead & A. Morehead (eds), 191–209. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.
Forner, M. 1979. The mother as LAD: Interaction between order and frequency of parental input and child production. In Studies in First and Second Language Acquisition, F.R. Eckman & A.J. Hastings (eds), 17–44. Rowley MA: Newbury House.
Johnson, V., de Villiers, J. & Seymour, H. 2005. Agreement without understanding? The case of third person singular /s/. First Language 25: 317–330.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. 2000. The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C. E. 1985. The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12: 271–296.
MacWhinney, B. & Snow, C.E. 1990. The child language data exchange system: An update. Journal of Child Language 17: 457–472.
Moerk, E. 1980. Relationships between parental input frequencies and children’s language acquisition: A reanalysis of Brown’s data. Journal of Child Language 7: 105–118.
Sachs, J. 1983. Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse. In Children's Language, K.E. Nelson (ed.), 1–28. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shirai, Y. 1991. Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 1994. On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First language 14: 67–82.
. 1998. The emergence of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition? First Language 18: 281–310.
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R.W. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 71: 743–762.
Stoll, S. 1998. The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect. First language 18: 351–377.
Theakston, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. 2003. The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46: 863–877.
Weist, R.M. 2002. The first language acquisition of tense and aspect: a review. In Tense- Aspect Morphology in L2 Acquisition [language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27], M.R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds), 21–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.