Cover not available

In:Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The process–product interface
Edited by Georgeta Cislaru
[Not in series 194] 2015
► pp. 81–98

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Re-writing operations and their effects of meaning

 | FoReLL A, University of Poitiers, France
 | CLESTHIA-Cediscor, Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3, France
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.05bru
This chapter studies the effects of meaning generated by re-writing operations (insertions, deletions, replacements) in a corpus of social worker reports. Intended to describe the situation of a child and his or her family, these reports are produced within the framework of educational guidance and assessment orders. The proper functioning of the judicial process is therefore contingent upon the proper composition of these reports. In this context, we focus our attention on the modifications undertaken by the reports’ authors with a view to making the writing more precise or adjusting the intensity of certain expressions – a composition process that navigates between producing an effect of objectivity and producing an effect of subjectivity.
References (21)
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Irène Tamba (Eds.). 2013. “L’intensification.” Langue française 177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, Hava, Silvia Adler, and Maria Asnes. 2010. “Approximation et precision: un champ à explorer.” L’Information grammaticale 125: 3–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, Pascale. 2014. Le vague, Vagheit. Du mot au concept − pragmatique et folk linguistics. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charolles, Michel. 2002. La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cislaru, Georgeta. 2014. “Contraintes linguistiques et contextuelles dans la production écrite.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 12: 55–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noëlle. 2009. “Le nom propre, entre langue et discours.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 11: 153–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth. 1989. “Fonctions du langage et genèse du texte.” In La Naissance du texte, ed. by Louis Hay, 177–192. Paris: Librairie José Corti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadermann, Pascale, Michel Pierrard, and Dan van Raemdonck (Eds.). 2007. “La scalarité: autant de moyens d’expressions, autant d’effets de sens.” Travaux de linguistique 54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huyette, Michel, and Philippe Desloges. 2009. Guide de la protection judiciaire de l’enfant: cadre juridique, pratiques éducatives, enjeux pour les familles. 4th ed. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesler, Reinhard. 2000. “Où en sont les études sur la mise en relief?” Le français moderne. Revue de linguistique française 68 (2): 224–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 2001. “Remarques sur la dénomination.” Cahiers de praxématique 36: 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “À la recherche de l’intensité.” Langue française 177: 63–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges, and Catherine Schnedecker (Eds.). 2007. “L’intensité.” Travaux de linguistique 55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nadeau, Robert. 1999. Vocabulaire technique et analytique de l’épistémologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Née, Émilie, Frédérique Sitri, and Marie Veniard. 2013, November. “Pour une approche des routines discursives dans les écrits professionnels.” Paper presented at the conference entitled “La phraséologie: les collocations aux séquences figées,” Grenoble, France.
Paveau, Marie-Anne. 2013. Langage et morale. Une éthique des vertus discursives. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pugnière-Saavedra, Frédéric. 2008. “Quelques régularités des écrits du signalement.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 10: 21–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat, and René Rioul. 2005 [1994]. Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Quadrige/PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, Clara. 2001. “L’intensité en français contemporain: analyse sémantique et pragmatique.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Paris 8.
. 2007. “Pour une définition générale de l’intensité dans le langage.” Travaux de linguistique 54: 57–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cislaru, Georgeta
2018. Letexte/discoursentre lieu d’observation et objet d’analyse : Eclairages sémantiques par le processus d’écriture. Semiotica 2018:223 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Cislaru, Georgeta & Thierry Olive
2018. Les jets textuels de révision : un point de vue dynamique sur la « reformulation ». Langages N° 212:4 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Références bibliographiques. In Le processus de textualisation [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue