Cover not available

In:Colour Studies: A broad spectrum
Edited by Wendy Anderson, Carole P. Biggam, Carole Hough and Christian Kay
[Not in series 191] 2014
► pp. 109125

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (34)
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003a. “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003c, 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. “On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003, 31–58.
(ed.). 2003c. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 7–59.
Barcelona, Antonio, Réka Benczes, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2011. “Introduction.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 1–6.
Benczes, Réka, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.) 2011. Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, John A. 2010. “Metaphor and Metonymy: Making their Connections More Slippery.” Cognitive Linguistics 21 (1): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words (COCA), [URL]
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, Rene, and Ralf Pörings (eds). 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions of Linguistic Action.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1990. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. [1980]2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Linda L. Thornburg, and Antonio Barcelona (eds.). 2009. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirsman, Yves, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2006. “Metonymy as a Prototypical Category.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 269–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, Günter. 2003. “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Barcelona 2003c, 93–108.
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metaphor and Pragmatic Inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reaney, P.H. 1997. A Dictionary of English Surnames.3rd ed. with corrections and additions by R.M. Wilson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 2003. “The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy.” In Barcelona 2003c, 109–132.
. 2011. Metonymy and Cognitive Operations.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 103–124.
Sandford, Jodi L. 2010. “I Can Tell You What Color it is.” Textus 23 (3), 719–735. A special issue entitled Cognition and the Brain in Language and Linguistics, ed. by Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. “Color Linguistic Vantage and the Surround.” In Proceedings of the Seventh National Color Conference, Gruppo del Colore – SIOF Sapienza Università di Roma, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Roma, Italy, 15–16 settembre 2011, ed. by Maurizio Rossi, 153–160. (= Colour and Colorimetry, Multidisciplinary Contributions, 7B). Rimini: Maggioli Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “Conceptual Metaphor and the Interaction Between Color and Light”. In AIC 2011, Interaction of Colour and Light in the Arts and Sciences, Midterm Meeting of the International Colour Association (AIC), 7–10 June 2011, Zurich, Switzerland: Conference Proceedings, ed. by Verena M. Schindler, and Stephan Cuber, 706–709. Zurich: pro/colore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011c. “Cool, Warm, Dark, Light, or Afterimage: Dimensions and Connotations of Conceptual Color Metaphor/Metonym.” In New Directions in Colour Studies, ed. by Carole P. Biggam, Carole A. Hough, Christian J. Kay, and David R. Simmons, 205–218. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Red Clover – Linguaggio e percezione dei colori: uno studio cognitivo applicato alla lingua inglese. Rome: Aracne Editrice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Semantics of Colour: A New Paradigm.” In Progress in Colour Studies, Volume 1: Language and Culture, ed. by C.P. Biggam and C.J. Kay, 1–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sandford, Jodi L.
2018. Methodological Approaches and Semantic Construal of the Seeing Domain in English. In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue