In:Colour Studies: A broad spectrum
Edited by Wendy Anderson, Carole P. Biggam, Carole Hough and Christian Kay
[Not in series 191] 2014
► pp. 109–125
Her blue eyes are red
An idealized cognitive model of conceptual color metonymy in English
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.191.07san
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.191.07san
The lexical frame of color as a primary experience is often used to exemplify linguistic theories and yet there is still a lack of a cognitive color model. Cognitive linguistics establishes meaning in a central role through the ideas of embodied experience and cognitive models that are evinced through usage-based analysis. I present the fifth type of distinction in a conceptual mapping of color in English; four types have been presented earlier in Sandford (2010, 2011a and 2011b). The new part of this mapping is Conceptual Color Metonymy, based on one hundred random examples of each of six basic color terms extracted from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. An idealized cognitive model of conceptual color metonymy mapping reveals primary conceptual correlations in experience, and the predominant conceptualization mechanism pattern that emerged from this study is color attribute (is access) for conceptual space.
References (34)
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003a. “Introduction: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003c, 1–28.
. 2003b. “On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor.” In Barcelona [2000] 2003, 31–58.
(ed.). 2003c. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2011. “Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 7–59.
Barcelona, Antonio, Réka Benczes, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2011. “Introduction.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 1–6.
Benczes, Réka, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.) 2011. Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barnden, John A. 2010. “Metaphor and Metonymy: Making their Connections More Slippery.” Cognitive Linguistics 21 (1): 1–34.
Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words (COCA), [URL]
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dirven, Rene, and Ralf Pörings (eds). 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goossens, Louis. 1990. “Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions of Linguistic Action.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323–340.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Linda L. Thornburg, and Antonio Barcelona (eds.). 2009. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Peirsman, Yves, and Dirk Geeraerts. 2006. “Metonymy as a Prototypical Category.” Cognitive Linguistics 17 (3): 269–316.
Radden, Günter. 2003. “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Barcelona 2003c, 93–108.
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metaphor and Pragmatic Inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reaney, P.H. 1997. A Dictionary of English Surnames.3rd ed. with corrections and additions by R.M. Wilson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 2003. “The Role of Mappings and Domains in Understanding Metonymy.” In Barcelona 2003c, 109–132.
. 2011. “Metonymy and Cognitive Operations.” In Benczes, Barcelona, and Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez 2011, 103–124.
Sandford, Jodi L. 2010. “I Can Tell You What Color it is.” Textus 23 (3), 719–735. A special issue entitled Cognition and the Brain in Language and Linguistics, ed. by Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez.
. 2011a. “Color Linguistic Vantage and the Surround.” In Proceedings of the Seventh National Color Conference, Gruppo del Colore – SIOF Sapienza Università di Roma, Facoltà di Ingegneria, Roma, Italy, 15–16 settembre 2011, ed. by Maurizio Rossi, 153–160. (= Colour and Colorimetry, Multidisciplinary Contributions, 7B). Rimini: Maggioli Editore.
. 2011b. “Conceptual Metaphor and the Interaction Between Color and Light”. In AIC 2011, Interaction of Colour and Light in the Arts and Sciences, Midterm Meeting of the International Colour Association (AIC), 7–10 June 2011, Zurich, Switzerland: Conference Proceedings, ed. by Verena M. Schindler, and Stephan Cuber, 706–709. Zurich: pro/colore.
. 2011c. “Cool, Warm, Dark, Light, or Afterimage: Dimensions and Connotations of Conceptual Color Metaphor/Metonym.” In New Directions in Colour Studies, ed. by Carole P. Biggam, Carole A. Hough, Christian J. Kay, and David R. Simmons, 205–218. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2012. Red Clover – Linguaggio e percezione dei colori: uno studio cognitivo applicato alla lingua inglese. Rome: Aracne Editrice.
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
. 2006. “The Semantics of Colour: A New Paradigm.” In Progress in Colour Studies, Volume 1: Language and Culture, ed. by C.P. Biggam and C.J. Kay, 1–24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
