In:Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking
Edited by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada and Maurice Nevile
[Not in series 187] 2014
► pp. 3–32
Towards multiactivity as a social and interactional phenomenon
Published online: 4 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.01had
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.01had
Multiactivity – the different ways in which two or more activities can be intertwined and made co-relevant in social interaction – is an inseparable element of everyday life. At the same time it is a little understood form of human conduct. This introductory chapter builds on the basis that multiactivity is a social, verbal and embodied phenomenon, manifest in people’s participation and conduct in interaction, and can be studied empirically by relying on the close analysis of video-recorded data of naturally occurring situations. The chapter connects to previous research on multitasking and outlines how an interactional and social view of the phenomenon can add to our knowledge of how participants engage in, manage and accomplish multiple activities. The chapter outlines new interactional practices and new concepts to describe them.
References (83)
Baron, N.S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. Mobile Communication Studies, 177–193.
Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79(1), 165–189.
Broth, M. (2009). Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: Managing distant studio space in television control room interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1998–2016.
Datchary, C., & Licoppe, C. (2007). La multi-activité et ses appuis: l’exemple de la “présence obstinée” des messages dans l’environnement de travail [Supporting multiactivity: The example of “stubborn presence” messages in the work environment]. Activités, 4(1), 4–29.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Egbert, M. (1997). Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(1), 1–51.
Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., & Weilenmann, A. (2007). Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction: Special issue on: In-Use, In-Situ: Extending Field Research Methods, 22(1 & 2), 37–58.
Francis, D., & Hester, S. (2004). An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage.
. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
. (2005). Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Edited by A.W. Rawls. Boulder: Paradigm.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
González, V.M., & Mark, G. (2005). Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations.
Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
, Paris, France, 18–22 September 2005, 143–162.
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M.H. (1995). Assembling a response: Setting and collaboratively constructed work talk. In P. ten Have, & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 173–186). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 436–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haddington, P., & Rauniomaa, M. (2011). Technologies, multitasking and driving: Attending to and preparing for a mobile phone conversation in the car. Human Communication Research, 37, 223–254.
Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2013). Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Haigney, D.E., & Westerman, J. (2001). Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: A critical review of research methodology. Ergonomics, 44(2), 132–143.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 24–48.
. (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D.W. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D.N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York, NY: Free Press.
Jensen, B.S., Skov, M.B., & Thiruravichandran, N. (2010). Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of GPS navigation in real traffic driving.
CHI ‘10 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(pp. 1271–1280). New York, NY: ACM.
Kalish, B.J., & Aebersold, M. (2010). Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 36(3), 126–132.
Kenyon, S. (2008). Internet use and time use: The importance of multitasking. Time & Society, 17, 283–318.
. (2010). Measuring multitasking: Methodological questions in time use research. In Proc. TRB 89th Annual meeting 2010, 10–16 January 2010. Washington DC, USA.
Kenyon, S., & Lyons, G. (2007). Introducing multitasking to the study of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessing its potential importance. Transportation Part A41(2), 161–175.
Lahlou, S. (2000). Attracteurs cognitifs et travail de bureau [Cognitive attractors and office work]. Intellectica, 30, 75–113.
Law, A.S., Logie, R.H., Pearson, D.G., Cantagallo, A., Moretti, E., & Dimarco, F. (2004). Resistance to the impact of interruptions during multitasking by healthy adults and dysexecutive patients. Acta Psychologica, 116, 285–307.
Laurier, E. (2002). Notes on dividing the attention of a car driver. Team Ethno Online, 1. Retreived March 2, 2014, from [URL]
LeBaron, C.D., & Jones, S.E. (2002). Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565.
Levy, M., & Gardner, R. (2012). Liminality in multitasking: Where talk and task collide in computer collaborations. Language in Society, 41(5), 557–587.
Loukopoulos, L.D., Dismukes, R.K., & Barshi, I. (2009). The multitasking myth: Handling complexity in real-world operations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Keiichi, Y., & Shinya, O. (2003). Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(1), 51–84.
McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P. (Eds.). (2009). Communicating place, space and mobility.Special Issue for Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10).
Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions, Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–72.
. (2006). Multiactivité, multimodalité et séquentialité: l’initiation de cours d’action parallèles en contexte scolaire [Multiactivity, multimodality and sequentiality: Initiating a parallel course of action in the school context]. In M.-C. Guernier, V. Durand-Guerrier, & J.-P. Sautot (Eds.). Interactions verbales, didactique et apprentissage [Verbal interaction, teaching and learning]. (pp. 45–72). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche Comté.
. (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. [88 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from [URL]
. (2011). The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
. (2009). “You are well clear of friendlies”: Diagnostic error and cooperative work in an Iraq War friendly fire incident. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 147–173.
Nevile, M., & Haddington, P. (2010). In-car distractions and their impact on driving activities. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Australian Commonwealth Government.
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.). (2014). Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pasquandrea, S. (2011). Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors’ involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions. Language in Society, 40, 455–481.
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36, 341–350.
Rogers, R. & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
Rubinstein, J.S., Meyer, D.E., & Evans, J.E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation [1964–1972] (Vol. 1 & 2). Edited by Gail Jefferson. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J.M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE, 8(1): e54402. .
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schenkein, J. (1978). Sketch of an analytic mentality for the study of conversational interaction. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Strayer, D.L., & Drews, F.A. (2007). Multitasking in the automobile. In Kramer, A.F., Wiegmann, D., & Kirlik, A. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 121–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strayer, D.L., Watson, J.M., & Drews, F.A. (2011). Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 29–58). Burlington: Academic Press.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L.A. (1997). Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin: Springer.
Toerien, M., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology41(4), 645–662.
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Bateman, Amanda, Julia Katila & Emily Hofstetter
Bergstrom, Tait
Salonen, Eija, Lasse Lipponen & Annukka Pursi
Tagg, Caroline & Shi Min Chua
Song, Le & Zhegong Shangguan
Avgustis, Iuliia & Florence Oloff
Ditchfield, Hannah
Du Bois, Inke
Kohonen-Aho, Laura
Krug, Maximilian
Krug, Maximilian
Vatanen, Anna
Vatanen, Anna & Pentti Haddington
Lehtimaja, Inkeri & Salla Kurhila
Wakke, Denise & Vivien Heller
Helmer, Henrike
Olin-Scheller, Christina, Marie Tanner, Stig-Börje Asplund, Janne Kontio & Peter Wikström
Rauniomaa, Mirka, Tiina Keisanen & Pauliina Siitonen
2021. Shared understandings of the human–nature relationship in
encounters with small wildlife. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 201 ff.
Robles, Jessica S., Stephen M. DiDomenico & Joshua Raclaw
2021. Chapter 2.1. Using objects and technologies in the immediate environment as resources for managing affect displays in troubles talk. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 101 ff.
Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall & Barry Brown
Ursi, Biagio
Arano, Yusuke
DiDomenico, Stephen M., Joshua Raclaw & Jessica S. Robles
Nissi, Riikka & Pekka Pälli
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2020. Mobilizing for the next relevant action. In Mobilizing others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 47 ff.
Yamauchi, Yutaka & Takeshi Hiramoto
Boström, Eva & Stina Öresland
Fomin, Ivan V. & Mikhail V. Ilyin
Kamunen, Antti
Harjunpää, Katariina, Lorenza Mondada & Kimmo Svinhufvud
Keevallik, Leelo
2018. The temporal organization of conversation while mucking out a sheep stable. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293], ► pp. 97 ff.
Oshima, Sae & Birte Asmuß
Schmidt, Axel
2018. Prefiguring the future. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293], ► pp. 231 ff.
Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe & Anna Spagnolli
Lefebvre, Augustin
Luke, K.K.
2016. Storytelling in multiple contexts. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Nielsen, Søren Beck
Svinhufvud, Kimmo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
