Cover not available

In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 357–378

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Instructed objects

 | Southern Illinois University
 | University at Albany, SUNY
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.16kos
This chapter develops an ethnomethodologically-informed view regarding the sociality of objects, building upon Garfinkel’s various descriptions of object constitution. We examine a particular case of diagnostic reasoning produced in the course of carrying out a surgical procedure at a teaching hospital. Our interest is in the methods employed by the surgeons in resolving certain incongruities in the case as it presents itself. Through an occasioned process of inquiry, the case at hand comes to be seen in a new light. This revised clinical picture is the oriented object under consideration here and it is produced as a discovered matter. We describe it as an instructed object to emphasise that perception is a kind of action and can too be taught. For us, as for Garfinkel, instruction is a fundamental feature of how social order is created and shared understanding sustained. In the analysed example, the methods by which a new appreciation of the case is achieved are public and inspectable. Instructional settings are, in this way, ‘perspicuous sites’ for investigating how “a world of meant objects” is produced.
References (31)
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1991/1949). Knowing and known. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1949–1952 (Vol. 16, pp. 1–294). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 347–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A.M.S. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other: A study in social order. Unpublished dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1962). Common-sense knowledge of social structures: The documentary method of interpretation. In J.M. Scher (Ed.), Theories of the mind (pp. 689–712). New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006/1948). Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008/1952). Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of Social Science, 11, 131–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, A. (2010/1964). The field of consciousness. In R.M. Zaner, & L. Embree (Eds.), The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973) (Vol. III, pp. 1–409). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 1501–1517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855–1878. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 521–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., & Zemel, A. (2009). Optical pulsars and black arrows: Discoveries as occasioned productions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 200–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). “So that’s the ureter”: The informal logic of discovering work. Ethnographic Studies, No. 12, 31–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1952). On the interpretation of Weltanschauung. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge: The collected works of Karl Mannheim ( Vol. V, pp. 33–83). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mori, J. (1999). Well, I may be exaggerating, but: Self-qualifying clauses in negotiation of opinions among Japanese speakers. Human Studies, 22, 447–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishizaka, A. (2011). Touch without vision: Referential practice in a non-technological environment. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 504–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollner, M. (1974). Sociological and common-sense models of the labeling process. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 27–40). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert, & M.L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. (1981). Interests and explanation in the social study of science. Social Studies of Science, 11, 365–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2013). Recalibrating reference within a dual-space interaction environment. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 65–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). “Put your fingers right in there”: Learnability and instructed experience”. Discourse Studies, 16, 163–183.
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Wang, Xiaoyun
2025. What can ‘professional vision’ tell us about teachers’ language alternation? A multimodal study of Chinese L2 classrooms. Language and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mlynář, Jakub, Himanshu Verma, Hamed S. Alavi & Denis Lalanne
2024. ‘All the good spots are already taken’: the visual properties of interior social sceneries. Visual Studies 39:4 ► pp. 516 ff. DOI logo
Abrahamson, Dor
2020. Strawberry feel forever: understanding metaphor as sensorimotor dynamics. The Senses and Society 15:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
de Boer, Bas, Hedwig te Molder & Peter-Paul Verbeek
2020. Constituting ‘Visual Attention’: On the Mediating Role of Brain Stimulation and Brain Imaging Technologies in Neuroscientific Practice. Science as Culture 29:4 ► pp. 503 ff. DOI logo
Kreplak, Yaël
2018. On Thick Records and Complex Artworks: A Study of Record-Keeping Practices at the Museum. Human Studies 41:4 ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Schmidt, Axel
2018. Prefiguring the future. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293], ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Kern, Friederike & Sören Ohlhus
2017. Fluency and the integration of semiotic resources in interactional learning processes. Classroom Discourse 8:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Sutkin, Gary, Eliza Beth Littleton, Steven L. Kanter, Anna T. Cianciolo, Xiaodong (Phoenix) Chen, Alexandra Cope & Timothy Koschmann
2017. Teaching, Learning, and Performance in the Surgical Workplace: Insights From the Examination of Intraoperative Interactions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 29:4 ► pp. 378 ff. DOI logo
Luff, Paul, Christian Heath, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka & Marina Jirotka
2016. Embedded Reference: Translocating Gestures in Video-Mediated Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:4 ► pp. 342 ff. DOI logo
Koschmann, Timothy & Alan Zemel
2015. Accessory cystic artery as instructed object. Medical Education 49:11 ► pp. 1055 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue