In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 271–294
Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store
How practices of categorisation matter
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.12ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.12ste
This chapter investigates how persons shopping together initiate orientation towards commercial objects that populate self-service stores. Drawing on the methods developed in conversation analysis, it discusses the actions that shoppers accomplish when introducing a ‘new’ object into their interaction. In the supermarket setting, objects are available resources: as customers navigate through the aisles of the store, they use (commercial) objects as landmarks, as resources allowing them to organise their overall shopping activity, to initiate buying decisions, to engage in topic talk, etc. This study furthermore discusses the multimodal resources that shoppers employ when establishing a joint focus of attention and analyses the categorisation work that they accomplish when orienting towards objects that are on sale.
References (45)
Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aston, G. (Ed.). (1988). Negotiating service: Studies in the discourse of bookshop encounters. Bologna: Clueb.
Bartoletti, R. (2002). La narrazione delle cose: Analisi socio-comunicativa degli oggetti [The narration of things: A socio-communicative analysis of objects]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bilmes, J. (2009). Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1600–1610.
Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W., & Engel, J.F. (2006). Consumer behavior. Mason: South-Western(10th ed.).
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement [Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste]. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Clark, C., & Pinch, T. (2010). Some major organisational consequences of some ‘minor’, organised conduct: Evidence from a video analysis of pre-verbal service encounters in a showroom retail store. In N. Llewellyn, & J. Hindmarsh (Eds.), Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 140–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Grammaticalization and conversation. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 424–437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Stefani, E. (2010). Reference as an interactively and multimodally accomplished practice: Organizing spatial reorientation in guided tours. In M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, & F.M. Dovetto (Eds.), Spoken communication (pp. 137–170). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. (2011). “Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono”. Agire come coppia al supermercato: Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali [Doing being a couple at the supermarket: A conversational and multimodal approach to decision-making processes]. Roma: Aracne.
. (2013). The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp. 123–151). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world as goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Allen Lane.
Duranti, A., & Ochs, E. (1979). Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 377–416). New York: Academic Press.
Enfield, N., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2007). Person reference in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D.L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson, & R.M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–205). London: Sage.
Geluykens, R. (1992). From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haakana, M., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2011). Invoking another context: Playfulness in buying lottery tickets at convenience stores. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1288–1302.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–28.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(5), 523–562.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2006). The mystery of the missing referent: Objects, procedures, and the problem of the instruction follower.
CSCW ’06 Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
. New York, ACM, 373–382.
Lambrecht, K. (2001). Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp. 1050–1078).Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, vol. 2.
Lamoureux, E.L. (1985). An analysis of conversation in service encounters. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge.
Mauss, M. (1923/1924). Essai sur le don: Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés primitives [An essay on the gift: The form and reason of exchange in archaic societies]. Année Sociologique, 1, 30–186.
Merritt, M.W. (1976). Resources for saying in service encounters. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Mitchell, T.F. (1957). The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hespéris, 44, 31–71.
Monzoni, C. (2005). The use of marked syntactic constructions in Italian multi-party conversation. In A. Hakulinen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction (pp. 129–157). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nevile, M. (2013). Collaboration in crisis: Pursuing perception through multiple descriptions (how friendly vehicles became damn rocket launchers). In A. De Rycker, & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives (pp. 159–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nishizaka, A. (2000). Seeing what one sees: Perception, emotion, and activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 105–123.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs, & B.B. Schiefflen (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Schegloff, E.A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.
. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B.A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 437–485). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Semprini, A. (Ed.). (1999). Il senso delle cose. I significati sociali e culturali degli oggetti quotidiani [The sense of things: The social and cultural meanings of everyday objects]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Stukenbrock, A., & Birkner, K. (2010). Multimodale Ressourcen für Stadtführungen [Multimodal resources for guided city tours]. In M. Costa, & B. Müller-Jacquier (Eds.), Deutschland als fremde Kultur: Vermittlungsverfahren in Stadtführungen [Germany as a foreign culture: Mediation procedures in guided city tours] (pp. 214–243). München: Iudicium.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Rasmussen, Gitte, Elisabeth Kristiansen & Søren Vigild Poulsen
Stukenbrock, Anja & Angeliki Balantani
2025. When the establishment of joint attention becomes problematic. In Mobile Eye Tracking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 351], ► pp. 243 ff.
Krummheuer, Antonia L. & Matthias Rehm
Rehm, Matthias, Antonia L. Krummheuer & Carlos G. Cubero
Hellmann, Kai-Uwe
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
2025. The influence of the specificities of gaze behavior on emerging and ensuing interaction. In Mobile Eye Tracking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 351], ► pp. 67 ff.
Mondada, Lorenza
Mondada, Lorenza
Mondada, Lorenza
2024. Requesting in shop encounters. In New Perspectives in Interactional Linguistic Research [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 36], ► pp. 278 ff.
Bazzanella, Carla
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.