In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 249–268
Having a ball
Immaterial objects in dance instruction
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.11kee
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.11kee
This chapter looks at how immaterial objects are manipulated into being for pedagogical purposes. Dance teachers employ objects to visualise subtle tactile and kinaesthetic experiences. The objects emerge in a situated manner within activity metaphors where alternative bodily activities are juxtaposed with the dance movement, taking for granted that these alternative activities are tacitly known or more basic. The objects have a temporally limited existence within activity metaphors that involve verbal explanations as well as embodied demonstrations of both the dance and the alternative activity. Furthermore, participants are shown to orient differently to mere object-implying gestures as opposed to fully-fledged whole-body enactments. In the latter, objects may be maintained collectively across time.
References (30)
Enfield, N.J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eriksson, M. (2009). Referring as interaction: On the interplay between linguistic and bodily practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 240–262.
Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual organization. Semiotica, 62(1/2), 29–49.
. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1855–1878.
. (2003). Transcending the object in embodied interaction. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 43– 69). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–32). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johnson, M., & Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves”: Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 63–84.
Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 1–26.
. (2013). The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–22.
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541.
Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., & Yamashita, J. (2006). Handling documents and discriminating objects in hybrid spaces. In
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
. Montréal, Québec, Canada, ACM, 561– 570.
Martin, C., & Sahlström, F. (2010). Learning as longitudinal interactional change: From other-repair to self-repair in physiotherapy treatment, Discourse Processes, 47(8), 668–697.
Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–73.
. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129.
. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 195–226.
Murphy, K. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1/4), 113–145.
Nishizaka, A. (2007). Hand touching hand: Referential practice at a Japanese midwife house. Human Studies, 30(3), 199–217.
. (2011). Touch without vision: Referential practice in a non-technological environment. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 504–520.
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409.
Sanchez Svensson, M., Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2009). Embedding instruction in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(6), 889–906.
Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365–384.
. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Nishizaka, Aug & Minato Suzuki
Chen, Lin
2024. Environmentally coupled depictive gestures in tea ceremony lessons. Gesture 23:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Nanbu, Zachary & Tim Greer
Öhman, Anna & Eva Klope
Löfgren, Agnes
Löfgren, Agnes
Ehmer, Oliver & Geert Brône
Singh, Ajit
Douglah, Jessica
Mustola, Marleena
Rauniomaa, Mirka, Esko Lehtonen & Heikki Summala
Råman, Joonas & Pentti Haddington
v. Wedelstaedt, Ulrich & Ajit Singh
2017. Intercorporeality with imaginary bodies. In Moving bodies in interaction – interacting bodies in motion [Advances in Interaction Studies, 8], ► pp. 323 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
