In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 227–248
To follow the materials
The detection, diagnosis and correction of mistakes in craft education
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.10eks
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.10eks
This chapter investigates the role and function of textile materials in relation to corrective sequences in craft education. The analyses explicate how problems are detected, how problems are diagnosed and how problems are corrected and solved. When students encounter problems related to their making of a textile object, there is a disruption in the progression of the activity. Disruptions in progressivity in the analysed setting are not heard in intervening talk, but seen in the ways the materials have turned out. Correspondingly, actions used to overcome these problems, whether conducted in talk or otherwise, are not done on talk but on actions and materials involved in the making of objects.
References (49)
Arminen, I., & Poikus, P. (2009). Diagnostic reasoning in the use of travel management system. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18(2–3), 251–276.
Boyd, E., & Heritage, J. (2006). Taking the history: Questioning during comprehensive history-taking. In J. Heritage, & D.W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 151–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Büscher, M., O’Neill, J., & Rooksby, J. (2009). Designing for diagnosing: Introduction to the special issue on diagnostic work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18(2–3), 109–128.
Ekström, A. (2012). Instructional work in textile craft: Studies of interaction, embodiment and the making of objects. Stockholms universitet: Studies in Education in Arts and Professions, 3.
Ekström, A., Lindwall, O., & Säljö, R. (2009). Questions, instructions and modes of listening in the joint production of guided action: A study of student-teacher collaboration in handicraft education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(5), 497–514.
Fasulo, A., & Monzoni, C. (2009). Assessing mutable objects: A multimodal analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 362–376.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
. (1997). The blackness of black: Color categories as situated practice. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 111–140). Berlin: Springer.
. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström, & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, T., Lindström, A., & Steensig, J. (2011). Addressing epistemic incongruency in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 107–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562.
. (2003). Transcending the object in embodied interaction. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 43–69). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 489–503.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Ivarsson, J. (2010). Developing the construction sight: Architectural education and technological change. Visual Communication, 9(2), 1–21.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription notation. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 11–38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button, & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation(pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 401–426.
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541.
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies 35(1), 27–49.
Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2005). Vulgar competence, ethnomethodological indifference and curricular design. In T. Koschmann, D.D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supportfor collaborative learning: The next 10 years (pp. 388–397). Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lindwall, O., Lymer, G., & Ivarsson, J. (2008). Att ge och ta kritik: Examination i arkitektutbildning som hybrid aktivitet [Delivering and receiving criticism: Assessment in architectural education as a hybrid activity]. In K. Borg, & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Kunskapande, kommunikation och bedömning i gestaltande utbildning [Knowing, communication and assessment in aesthetic education] (pp. 199–211). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Livingston, E. (2000). The availability of mathematics as an inspectable domain of practice through the use of origami. In S. Hester, & D. Francis (Eds.), Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action (pp. 245–270). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lymer, G., Lindwall, O., & Ivarsson, J. (2011). Space and discourse interleaved: Intertextuality and interpretation in the education of architects. Social Semiotics, 21(2), 197–217.
Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33(5), 703–736.
Mondada, L. (2009). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(4), 329–361.
Murphy, K.M. (2004). Imagination as joint activity: The case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(4), 267–278.
. (2005). Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice. Semiotica, 156(1), 113–145.
. (2012). Transmodality and temporality in design interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(14), 1966–1981.
Murphy, K.M., Ivarsson, J., & Lymer, G. (2012). Embodied reasoning in architectural critique. Design Studies, 33(6), 53–556.
Nevile, M. (2007). Action in time: Ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit. Language in Society, 36(2), 233–257.
Poole, E., Edwards, K., & Jarvis, L. (2009). The home network as a socio-technical system: Understanding the challenges of remote home network problem diagnosis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18(2–3), 277–299.
Reed, B., Reed, D., & Haddon, E. (2013). NOW or NOT NOW: Coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in musical masterclasses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 22–46.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sanne, J. (2009). Making matters speak: Trouble-shooting in railway maintenance. In M. Büscher, D. Goodwin, & J. Mesman (Eds.), Ethnographies of diagnostic work: Dimensions of transformative practice (pp. 54–72). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weeks, P. (1985). Error-correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: Toward a comparative framework. Human Studies, 8(3), 195–233.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Breidenstein, Georg, Friederike Heinzel, Patrick Schreyer & Tanya Tyagunova
Keevallik, Leelo, Emily Hofstetter & Jan Lindström
2025. Linguistic and other vocal resources of instructing bodies. Interactional Linguistics 5:1-2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, Xiaoyun
Wilton, Antje
Öhman, Anna & Eva Klope
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
Ishino, Mika
Evans, Bryn & Oskar Lindwall
Tuncer, Sylvaine & Pentti Haddington
Deppermann, Arnulf
Råman, Joonas & Pentti Haddington
Schmidt, Axel
2018. Prefiguring the future. In Time in Embodied Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 293], ► pp. 231 ff.
Öhman, Anna
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
