In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 125–144
Photo sharing as a joint activity between an aphasic speaker and others
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.06aal
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.06aal
The chapter concerns the usages of a digital camera and digital photographs as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods in interaction between aphasic and non-challenged speakers. It focuses on the way in which a universal tool (the ‘ubi-tech’ method) can contribute to the fluency of spontaneous everyday interactions. The video-recorded conversation is analysed with conversation analytical methods. We highlight the way in which sharing photographs on the display of a digital camera affects the organisation of social activity through bringing in additional semiotic resources that empower the person with aphasia. The digital camera and photos also assist in manifesting the epistemic status of a knowing participant who otherwise tends to be limited by communicative constraints.
References (59)
Aaltonen, T. (2010). Mind-reading, a method for understanding the fragmented story of an aphasic man. In M. Hyvärinen, L-C. Hydén, M. Saarenheimo, & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Beyond narrative coherence (pp. 49–66). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Aaltonen, T., & Raudaskoski, S. (2011). Storyworld evoked by hand-drawn maps. Social Semiotics, 21(2), 317–336.
Annable, G., Goggin, G., & Stienstra, D. (2007). Accessibility, disability, and inclusion in information technologies: Introduction. The Information Society, 23, 145–147.
Arminen, I., Auvinen, P., & Palukka, H. (2010). Repairs as the last orderly provided defense of safety in aviation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 443–465.
Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy – reshaping of social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1905–1923.
Atkinson, J.M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Beukelman, D., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 230–242.
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. (3rd edition). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Blackstone, S., Williams, M., & Wilkins, D. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272–282.
Callon, M. (2008). Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: From prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In T. Pinch, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world: Economic Sociology meets Science and Technology Studies (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 3–15.
Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 233–260.
. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haakana, M., & Kurhila, S. (2009). Other-correction in everyday interaction: Some comparative aspects. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 152–179). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analyzing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
Higginbotham, D.J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 243–257.
Holland, A. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology from telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button, & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Johnson, R.K., Hough, M.S., King, K.A., Vos, P., & Jeffs, T. (2008). Functional communication in individuals with chronic severe aphasia using augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 269–280.
Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 12(9), 816–830.
Klippi, A. (1996). Conversation as an achievement in aphasics. Studia fennica linguistica 6. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1083–1110.
Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. Studia Fennica Linguistica 8. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Laakso. M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: An interactive view on the extended speaking turns of Wernicke’s aphasics. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York: Oxford University Press.
Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess” sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 345–363.
Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M-L. (2010). Cut-off or particle – ways of initiating self-repair in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1151–1172.
Laakso, M., & Tykkyläinen, T. (2009). Gendered practices of negotiation? Comparing girls and boys’ practices of making proposals in same-sex peer play. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensions (pp. 279–298). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2006). Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Psychology Press.
Lasker, J.P., Garret, K.L., & Fox, L.E. (2007). Severe aphasia. In D.R. Beukelman, K.L. Garrett, & K.M. Yorkston (Eds.), Augmentative communication strategies for adults with acute or chronic medical conditions (pp. 163–206).Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Lindström, A., & Mondada, L. (2012). Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 299–308.
McKelvey, M.L., Dietz, A.R., Hux, K., Weissling, K., & Beukelman, D.R. (2007). Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a visual scene display prototype. Journal of Medical Speech\-Language Pathology, 15(3), 305–317.
Milroy, L.. & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,6(1&2), 27–40.
Mondada, L. (2008). Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39.
. (2012). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 329–361.
Oelschlaeger, M.L., & Damico, J.S. (2000). Partnership in conversation: A study of word search strategies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 205–225.
Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: Interactional issues. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198.
Raudaskoski, S. (2009). Tool and machine: The affordance of the mobile phone. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1441. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T. (2012). Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50(4), 696–735.
van de Sandt-Koenderman, M.W.M.E. (2004). High-tech AAC and aphasia: Widening horizons? Aphasiology, 18(3), 245–263.
Schegloff, E. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 231–246). New York: Academic Press.
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Lindeberg, Sophia, Carl Zarén, Lars-Christer Hydén & Christina Samuelsson
Oloff, Florence & Katharina König
Avgustis, Iuliia & Florence Oloff
Robles, Jessica S., Stephen M. DiDomenico & Joshua Raclaw
2021. Chapter 2.1. Using objects and technologies in the immediate environment as resources for managing affect displays in troubles talk. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 101 ff.
DiDomenico, Stephen M., Joshua Raclaw & Jessica S. Robles
Isaac, Adrienne R. & Heidi E. Hamilton
Rosenbaun, Laura & Christian Licoppe
2019. Showing ‘digital’ objects in web-based video chats as a collaborative achievement. In Skyping the Family [Benjamins Current Topics, 103], ► pp. 119 ff.
Rosenbaun, Laura & Christian Licoppe
2022. Showing ‘digital’ objects in web-based video chats as a collaborative achievement. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 419 ff.
Baier, Carissa K., Jerry K. Hoepner & Thomas W. Sather
Licoppe, Christian & Julien Figeac
Björk-Willén, Polly
Greer, Tim
Raclaw, Joshua, Jessica S. Robles & Stephen M. DiDomenico
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
