In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 101–124
Objects as tools for talk
Published online: 12 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.05day
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.05day
This paper deals with the touching, grasping, moving and handling of relatively small physical objects within spates of talk-in-interaction. We are interested in the organisation of such actions and the distribution of the objects amongst interactants in their unfolding activities, specifically in relation to how nteractants, analogously, organise and distribute their turns at talk. Unlike previous work, we attend less to objects as referred-to objects or as components of topic development. Instead, our focus is on objects as transactional in the ways in which they support fundamental infrastructure of interaction, namely that turns at talk and objects are taken or possessed in some sense and this is signalled and collaboratively organised by participants.
References (33)
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2000). Configuring action in objects: From mutual space to media space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 81–104.
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000a). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1855–1878.
. (2000b). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29, 523–562.
Jefferson, G. (1984a). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso, & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
. (1984b). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm hm’. Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 197–216.
. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Keisanen, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2012). The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 323–351.
Landgrebe, J., & Wagner, J. (submitted). Props in a planning and design activity.
Local, J., & Walker, G. (2004). Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1375–1403.
Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multi-modal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8, 117–129.
. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9, 194–225.
Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46, 491–515.
Nevile, M. (2004a). Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
. (2004b). Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 447–480.
. (2009). “You are well clear of friendlies”: Diagnostic error and cooperative work in an Iraq War friendly fire incident. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18, 147–173.
Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In R. Gardner, & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221–245). London/New York: Continuum.
Psathas, G. (1990). The organization of talk, gaze and activity in a medical interview. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 205–30). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E.A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365–384.
. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. (2011). The changing meaning of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 67–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Gestures at the transition place. In P. Auer, & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–157). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Lindeberg, Sophia, Carl Zarén, Lars-Christer Hydén & Christina Samuelsson
Mitani, Koyuki
Mortensen, Kristian
Wilton, Antje
Badder, Anastasia
Cooper, Christina Melanie & Jacob Buur
Sugiharto, Setiono & Magpika Handayani
Asplund, Stig-Börje, Nina Kilbrink & Hamid Asghari
Greer, Tim & Chris Leyland
Fukuda, Chie & Matthew Burdelski
Mondada, Lorenza
Yrjönsuuri, Varpu, Kaiju Kangas & Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.