Cover not available

In:Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity
Edited by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa
[Not in series 186] 2014
► pp. 57–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews

 | University of Vaasa
 | University of Vaasa
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.03mik
This study shows how participants of performance appraisal interviews use appraisal forms as material objects in initiations of activity shifts. Participants negotiate their willingness to proceed from one interview item to another by gazing at, pointing toward and manipulating the forms. This study contributes to earlier studies of written documents as material objects in interaction, by showing, firstly, how written documents can be used in a step-by-step embodied negotiation; secondly, how orientation to material objects makes it possible for participants to conduct two activities at the same time; and thirdly, how the document’s role as the agenda of an encounter is consequential for the activity. The data of this study consist of six video-recorded appraisal interviews from a Finnish public organisation.
References (34)
Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). “Brilliant. Next question…”: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(3), 235–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asmuss, B. (2008). Performance appraisal interviews: Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 408–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, W.A. (1995). Preserving and constraining options: “Okays” and ‘official’ priorities in medical interviews. In G.H. Morris, & R.J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 259–289). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden, & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 251–277). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifton, J. (2012). Conversation analysis in dialogue with stocks of interactional knowledge: Facework and appraisal interviews. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 283–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, A., Schmitt, R., & Mondada, L. (2010). Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1700–1718. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenn, P., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication, 5(1), 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, E. (2010). The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(6), 1513–1525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview: The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Komter, M. (2006). Introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 195–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?”: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurier, E. (2008). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the café. Language & Communication, 28(2), 165–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2002). Protocols, practices, and the reproduction of technique in molecular biology. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 203–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Video analysis and the temporality of inscriptions within social interaction: The case of architects at work. Qualitative Research, 12(3), 304–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mortensen, K., & Lundsgaard, C. (2011). Preliminary notes on ‘grooming the object’: The example of an architectural presentation. In J. Buur (Ed.), Participatory Innovation Conference, 13th–15th January, Sønderborg, Denmark (pp. 91–96).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2004). Integrity in the airline cockpit: Embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(4), 447–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M.F. (2012). Using artifacts in brainstorming sessions to secure participation and decouple sequentiality. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 87–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, M.F., Nielsen, S.B., Gravengaard, G., & Due, B. (2012). Interactional functions of invoking procedure in institutional settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(11), 1457–1473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J., & Stivers, T. (2001). Achieving activity transitions in primary-care encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research, 27(2), 253–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, J. (2000). Control in medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary health care. Tampere: Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Looking means listening: Coordinating displays of engagement in doctor–patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52(7), 1093–1108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Volume I. Edited by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, J. (2012). The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies, 14(1), 53–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svinhufvud, K., & Vehviläinen, S. (2013). Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text & Talk, 33(1), 139–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Lindeberg, Sophia, Carl Zarén, Lars-Christer Hydén & Christina Samuelsson
2025. Digital or analogue communication supports - does it matter?. Educational Gerontology 51:2 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Luke, Alex & Karin Tusting
2025. ‘SMART goals’ and ‘HR language’: technologised literacy practices and counter-conduct in the workplace. Text & Talk DOI logo
Mitani, Koyuki
2025. Use of inscribed objects in roleplay training sessions at a Japanese insurance company. Multimodal Communication 14:3 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Uyar, Gülşah & Ufuk Balaman
2024. The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly 21:3 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Heinonen, Pilvi, Jarkko Niemi & Timo Kaski
2023. Changing participation in web conferencing: the shared computer screen as an online sales interaction resource. Applied Linguistics Review 14:4 ► pp. 751 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2023. Identity gatekeeping in New Work Order organizations. Pragmatics and Society 14:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Ishino, Mika
2022. Teachers’ embodied mitigation against allocating turns to unwilling students. Classroom Discourse 13:4 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Lehtinen, Esa & Pekka Pälli
2021. On the participatory agency of texts: Using institutional forms in performance appraisal interviews. Text & Talk 41:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Ro, Eunseok
2021. Using written task answer sheets as notes while speaking: changing task-report practices in a second language book club. Text & Talk 41:3 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Ro, Eunseok
2023. Note-taking/making as a resource for substantiating advice at a second language speaking center. Text & Talk 43:6 ► pp. 797 ff. DOI logo
Ro, Eunseok
2025. Changing practices of instruction-giving in video-mediated interaction for an extensive reading book club. Computer Assisted Language Learning 38:3 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Hazel, Spencer
2020. Doing notes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 14:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Dolata, Mateusz, Susanne Steigler, Fiona Nüesch, Ulrike Schock, Doris Agotai, Simon Schubiger, Mehmet Kilic & Gerhard Schwabe
2019. Welcome, Computer! How Do Participants Introduce a Collaborative Application During Face-to-Face Interaction?. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11748], ► pp. 600 ff. DOI logo
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Birte Asmuß, Pentti Henttonen & Niklas Ravaja
2019. Complaining About Others at Work. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Yrjönsuuri, Varpu, Kaiju Kangas & Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen
2019. Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Childs, Carrie & Dave Walsh
2018. Paradoxical Invitations: Challenges in Soliciting More Information from Child Witnesses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:4 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Björk-Willén, Polly
2016. Peer Collaboration in Front of Two Alphabet Charts. In Friendship and Peer Culture in Multilingual Settings [Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 21], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kääntä, Leila, Gabriele Kasper & Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2016. Explaining Hooke’s Law: Definitional Practices in a CLIL Physics Classroom. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw025 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza & Kimmo Svinhufvud
2016. Writing-in-interaction. Language and Dialogue 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue