In:Homo Symbolicus: The dawn of language, imagination and spirituality
Edited by Christopher S. Henshilwood and Francesco d'Errico
[Not in series 168] 2011
► pp. 205–224
Chapter 11. Metarepresentation, Homo religiosus, and Homo symbolicus
Published online: 16 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.11bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.11bar
What cognitive adaptation enabled humans to become the distinctively symbolic species that we are? Drawing upon insights from the cognitive sciences and evolutionary psychology, research in cognitive science of religion (CSR) converges on the claim that the ability to form mental representations about mental representations (metarepresentation) is a key factor enabling and encouraging religious expression. Such metarepresentation may also be the key to symbolic behaviour – including linguistic expression – more generally. If so, then the same cognitive equipment that underwrites symbolism also gave rise to religion, and the two could have evolved concurrently.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Zikidi, Claire
Pettitt, Paul
Messick, Kyle J.
Barrett, Justin L.
Barrett, Justin L. & Ryan G. Hornbeck
Rossano, Matt J. & Benjamin Vandewalle
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
