In:Homo Symbolicus: The dawn of language, imagination and spirituality
Edited by Christopher S. Henshilwood and Francesco d'Errico
[Not in series 168] 2011
► pp. 75–96
Chapter 4. Middle Stone Age engravings and their significance to the debate on the emergence of symbolic material culture
Christopher S. Henshilwood | Institute for Archaeology, History, Culture and Religion, University of Bergen | Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand
Francesco d'Errico | Institute for Archaeology, History, Culture and Religion, University of Bergen | CNRS-UMR 5199 PACEA, Université de Bordeaux
Published online: 16 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.04hen
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.04hen
Archaeological evidence associated with modern cognitive abilities provides important insights into when and where modern human behaviour emerged. Modern human behaviour here means the thoughts and actions spontaneously shaped by minds equivalent to those of Homo sapiens today. Key among these is the use of symbols. Three models for the origins of behavioural modernity are current: (i) a late and rapid appearance at ~ 40–50 ka associated with the European Upper Palaeolithic and the Later Stone Age (LSA) of sub-Saharan Africa, (ii) an earlier and more gradual evolution rooted in the African Middle Stone Age (MSA ~ 300–40 ka), (iii) a discontinuous evolution rooted in both the African Middle Stone Age and the Mousterian of Eurasia. Material evidence for modern behaviour before 40 ka in Africa was, until a few years ago, relatively rare and often regarded as ambiguous compared to evidence from the Upper Palaeolithic or LSA. However, in sub-Saharan Africa archaeological evidence for changes in technology, economy and social organization and the emergence of symbolism in the Middle Stone Age contradicts the first model. Examples of these changes include standardized formal lithic tools, shaped bone implements, innovative subsistence strategies, evidence for personal ornaments and the deliberate engraving of abstract designs on ochre, ostrich eggshell and bone. In this chapter we review the earliest evidence for purposely made engravings from southern Africa and discuss their significance for arguments favouring early advances in human cognition.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Erdos, Marta B.
Miyagawa, Shigeru, Rob DeSalle, Vitor Augusto Nóbrega, Remo Nitschke, Mercedes Okumura & Ian Tattersall
Moos, Elena T., Gregor D. Bader & Manuel Will
Nast, Heidi J.
Wagner, Patrycja
Wagner, Patrycja
Dapschauskas, Rimtautas, Matthias B. Göden, Christian Sommer & Andrew W. Kandel
Culley, Elisabeth V. & Iain Davidson
Iliopoulos, Antonis & Lambros Malafouris
García-Diez, Marcos & Blanca Ochoa
García-Diez, Marcos & Blanca Ochoa
Garofoli, Duilio & Antonis Iliopoulos
Marchand, Gregor
Straffon, Larissa Mendoza
Bicho, Nuno & João Cascalheira
Majkić, Ana, Francesco d’Errico, Stefan Milošević, Dušan Mihailović & Vesna Dimitrijević
Roberts, Patrick, James Blinkhorn & Michael D. Petraglia
Coss, Richard G.
Joordens, Josephine C. A., Francesco d’Errico, Frank P. Wesselingh, Stephen Munro, John de Vos, Jakob Wallinga, Christina Ankjærgaard, Tony Reimann, Jan R. Wijbrans, Klaudia F. Kuiper, Herman J. Mücher, Hélène Coqueugniot, Vincent Prié, Ineke Joosten, Bertil van Os, Anne S. Schulp, Michel Panuel, Victoria van der Haas, Wim Lustenhouwer, John J. G. Reijmer & Wil Roebroeks
Wadley, Lyn
Wadley, Lyn
Schott, G D
Froese, Tom, Alexander Woodward & Takashi Ikegami
García-Diez, Marcos, Blanca Ochoa Fraile & Ignacio Barandiarán Maestu
Moffett, Mark W.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
