In:Chomskyan (R)evolutions
Edited by Douglas A. Kibbee
[Not in series 154] 2010
► pp. 103–168
Get fulltext
Noam and Zellig
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 18 February 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.154.05nev
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.154.05nev
In this paper, we explore when and how the work of Noam Chomsky diverged from that of his mentor, Zellig Harris, and identify the origins and character of their differences. Considering evidence that they never fully understood each other, the rhetorical vehicle for this exploration is speculation as to how much this divergence is due to differences of temperament, to “post-war” generational differences, or, with more importance for the field, to different conceptions of the proper conduct of science. A number of questions are addressed, such as: Is truth attained by winning arguments, or is the appropriate role of argument to do everything possible to prove oneself wrong? Is a theory of language a prerequisite to or an outcome of linguistic analysis? And what are the fundamental data of linguistics?
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2025. The prehistory of generative grammar and Chomsky’s debt to Emil
Post. Historiographia Linguistica
DO, Youngah & Shannon MOONEY
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
Stanlaw, James
Graffi, Giorgio
2016. Harris, Chomsky and the origins of transformational grammar. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
