In:In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory: Essays in the four fields of anthropology
Edited by John D. Bengtson
[Not in series 145] 2008
► pp. 57–148
Lexicostatistical comparison of Omotic languages
Published online: 3 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.145.12bla
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.145.12bla
The taxonomy of the Omotic language family is thoroughly analyzed. The hypotheses of “West Cushitic” vs. a “Cushomotic” super-branch, vs. separating Omotic as the sixth branch of Afroasiatic (Fleming) are compared. Earlier classifications of the Omotic family are presented, followed by the author’s version based on S.A. Starostin’s variant of glottochronology. According to the latter the North/South Omotic disintegration can be dated to the beginning of the 5th mill. BC. Borrowings can be distinguished from inherited lexicon, though often one can only speculate on the direction of borrowing. Nilo-Saharan parallels were also taken into account. The numbers of cognates common to Omotic and other Cushitic branches on the one hand are contrasted with those common to Omotic and the other Afroasiatic families on the other. It seems most natural to see in Omotic an independent member of the Afroasiatic macro-phylum.
1. Internal classification
2. Phonetic correspondences
3. Basic lexicon
4. Etymological comments
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Cooper, Julien Charles
Takács, Gábor
Takács, Gábor
Takács, Gábor
Takács, Gábor
Takács, Gábor
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
