In:Adapting Health Communication to Cultural Needs: Optimizing documents in South-African health communication on HIV and AIDS
Edited by Piet Swanepoel and Hans Hoeken
[Not in series 140] 2008
► pp. 151–170
9. Visual health communication: Why and how do literate and low literate South Africans differ in their understanding of visual health messages?
Published online: 14 August 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.140.09mae
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.140.09mae
This chapter focuses on the use of stand alone visuals as a health promotion medium in South-Africa. First, we survey the effectiveness of visuals as health intervention medium in a low literacy context. Second, we present an interpretation framework for complex communicative visuals, based on two related ideas: (i) the interpretation of visuals benefits from different types of natural correspondences with perceptual real world experiences, and (ii) interpreting visuals requires three interpretation strategies (symptomatic, iconic, symbolic) which increase in the level of abstraction they require and decrease in the level of natural correspondence with the real world they rely on. This framework enables us to predict an increase in comprehension problems as visuals rely less on natural correspondences and require more abstract interpretation strategies. Furthermore, these comprehension problems are expected to increase as viewers are less experienced and educated in reading the formal language of visuals. Third, we present the set up and results of a study in which we tested these predictions. We asked literate and low literate South African respondents to interpret complex visuals taken from recent South African HIV/AIDS brochures. The results confirm a decrease in comprehension performance as visuals require more abstract, convention based interpretation strategies, an evolution which is more pronounced in the group of low literates.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
McWhirter, Jennifer E. & Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Eilam, Billie
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
