In:Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching
Edited by Fanny Meunier and Sylviane Granger
[Not in series 138] 2008
► pp. 85–99
Contrasting English-Spanish interpersonal discourse phrases: A corpus study
Published online: 6 February 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.138.08aer
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.138.08aer
This chapter presents the results of a contrastive study of interactional phrases (discourse strategies intended to actively engage the reader in the argumentation process) as used by novice and expert writers of argumentative texts of both English and Spanish. The novice writer texts, those produced by Spanish EFL and American university writers, were compared to expert Anglo writers’ texts, opinion editorial articles. The Spanish editorials were used to trace the transfer of interactional patterns in the Spanish EFL texts. The phrases searched for in the various corpora consisted of the following types of interpersonal expressions: certainty markers, attitudinal markers and those constructions which are used for the presentation of evaluations in argumentation (adverbial phrases, such as clearly, certainly, etc.; it + adjective phrases: it is possible,un/likely + that/to; it is necessary, clear, certain, obvious, true, etc., + to/that; and, the transfer of the se passive impersonal construction from Spanish to the EFL texts). The results show that the interactional phrases used by Spanish EFL students in comparison with those used by the other three groups are influenced by incomplete mastery of the modal system, choice of adjectival lexical phrases and transfer of the reflexive passive impersonal construction from Spanish.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Guzzi, Eleonora
Rodríguez-Castro, Mónica & Concepción B. Godev
2024. Implicit agent se-constructions. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 628 ff.
Macqueen, Susy & Ute Knoch
2020. Adaptive imitation. In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54], ► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
