In:Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
Edited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 343–360
Chapter 17The ontology of the linguistic territoriality principle
A conceptual roadmap
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.17mor
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.17mor
Abstract
The linguistic territoriality principle is popular both among theorists and practitioners of language policy. But its precise content is notoriously vague. A plethora of different meanings have been attached to it, leading to conceptual and normative confusion. This chapter proposes a novel conceptualization of this principle, in order to operationalize it both for theory and practice. It elaborates a proper definition of the LTP, illustrates its numerous versions and offers a state-of-the-art overview of justifications for and critiques of the LTP. The chapter works out, in short, a full ontology of the LTP, against the background of notions of mobility and inclusion. Our main research question is the following: what is at the conceptual and moral core of the territoriality principle? What are the crucial notions that need to be present in order to meaningfully speak of linguistic territoriality, and why do these notions matter morally? To address these questions, we offer and discuss two metrics that could constitute the core of the LTP: the linguistic coerciveness metric and the linguistic diversity metric. We argue that, although the coerciveness metric is relevant, the diversity metric is at the conceptual core of territoriality, such that we ought to understand linguistic territoriality as fundamentally characterized by linguistic monism, or monolingualism. Finally, we draw implications that such a view of LTP might have for the key concepts of mobility and inclusion.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Political philosophy as an analytical framework
- 3.The linguistic territoriality principle: An overview
- 4.The linguistic principles metric: An ontology of territoriality
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (39)
Ansperger, Christian & Van Parijs, Philippe. (2002). Ética Económica y Social: Teorías de la Sociedad Justa. Barcelona: Paidós.
Barry, Brian. (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bauböck, Rainer. (2015). The Political Value of Languages. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18(2), 212–223.
Branchadell, Albert. (2005). La Moralitat de la Política Lingüística. Un Estudi Comparat de la Legimitat Liberaldemocràtica de les Polítiques Lingüístiques del Quebec i Catalunya. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
De Schutter, Helder. (2008). The Linguistic Territoriality Principle – A Critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(2), 105–120.
. (2011). ‘Let’s Brusselize the World!’, in A. Gosseries & Y. Vanderborght (Eds.), Arguing about Justice. Essays for Philippe Van Parijs (pp. 199–206). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
. (2014). Testing for Linguistic Injustice: Territoriality and Pluralism. Nationalities Papers 42(6), 1034–1052.
Fearon, James D. & Laitin, David D. (2011). Sons of the soil, migrants, and civil war. World Development 39(2): 199–211.
Gagnon, Alain-G. (2012). Temps d’Incertituds. Assajos sobre el Federalisme i la Diversitat Nacional. Valencia: Editorial Afers, Universitat de València.
Grin, François. (1994). ‘Combining Immigrant and Autochthonous Language Rights: A Territorial Approach to Multilingualism’, in T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson & M. Rannut (Eds.), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (pp. 31–48). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2011). ‘Using territoriality to support genuine linguistic diversity, not to get rid of it’, in P. De Grauwe & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The Linguistic Territoriality Principle: Right Violation or Parity of Esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11 (pp. 28–33). Brussels: University Foundation.
Knight, Carl. (2017). ‘Reflective Equilibrium’, in A. Blau (Ed.), Methods in Analytical Political Theory (pp. 46–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2001a). Politics in the Vernacular. Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. (2001b). ‘Territorial Boundaries: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’, in D. Miller & S. H. Hashmi (Eds.), Boundaries and Justice. Diverse Ethical Perspectives (pp. 249–275). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Levrau, François & Loobuyck, Patrick. (2013). Is Multiculturalism Bad for Social Cohesion and Redistribution? The Political Quarterly 84(1), 101–109.
List, Christian & Valentini, Laura. (2016). ‘The Methodology of Political Theory’, in H. Cappelen, T. Szabó Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
May, Stephen. (2014). Contesting Public Monolingualism and Diglossia: Rethinking Political Theory and Language Policy for a Multilingual World. Language Policy 13(4), 371–393.
McRae, Kenneth. (1975). The Principle of Territoriality and the Principle of Personality in Multilingual States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 4, 33–54.
Morales-Gálvez, Sergi. (2017). Living Together as Equals: Linguistic Justice and Sharing the Public Sphere in Multilingual Settings. Ethnicities 17(5), 646–666.
Patten, Alan. (2014). Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pettit, Philip. (2012). On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. (2003). ‘Accommodation Rights for Hispanics in the U.S’, in W. Kymlicka and A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Réaume, Denise. (2003). ‘Beyond Personality: The Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered’, in W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 271–295). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riera-Gil, Elvira. (2016). Why Languages Matter to People: Communication, Identity and Justice in Western Democracies. The Case of Mixed Societies. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis de l’Autogovern.
. (2018). The Communicative Value of Local Languages: An Underestimated Interest in Theories of Linguistic Justice. Ethnicities 19(1), 174–199.
Scanlon, Thomas M. (2003). ‘Rawls on Justification’, in S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 139–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stojanović, Nenad. (2010). Une conception dynamique du principe de territorialité linguistique. Loi sur les langues du canton des Grisons. Politique et Sociétés 29(1), 231–259.
Van Parijs, Philippe. (2000). The Ground Floor of the World. On the Socio-Economic Consequences of Linguistic Globalisation. International Political Science Review 21(2), 217–233.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
