Article published In: Process and Acquisition of Written Language
Edited by Robert Schreuder and Ludo Verhoeven
[Written Language & Literacy 7:1] 2004
► pp. 61–77
Still errors after all those years ...
Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch
Published online: 30 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.1.07san
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.1.07san
We review some of our research findings on verb spelling errors in Dutch. The spelling of Dutch regularly inflected verb forms is governed by rules of the simple concatenative type (stem + suffix). The spelling of a subset of these verb forms is determined by morpheme-based analogy, both at the level of the stem-final letter and at the level of the inaudible (i.e., silent) suffix. This subset of verb forms causes many spelling problems, both in the learning stage and in the spelling process of experienced spellers. Our research identifies two sources of these errors. First, the error risk results from the time-consuming nature of the cognitive operations needed for spelling the silent suffix. Second, the errors follow a particular pattern: the typical error is a homophonic verb spelling form which has a higher frequency of occurrence in the Dutch written language than the target form. This homophone frequency effect shows that regularly inflected verb forms with silent suffixes have their own orthographic representation in the mental lexicon, even though they are fully predictable by rule.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Tijn Schmitz & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
Sandra, Dominiek, Dorit Ravid & Ingo Plag
Stolk, Joanne Vera
Søby, Katrine Falcon, Byurakn Ishkhanyan & Line Burholt Kristensen
Gahl, Susanne & Ingo Plag
2022. Spelling errors in English derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength. The Mental Lexicon ► pp. 1 ff.
Sandra, Dominiek
Chamalaun, Robert J. P. M., Anna M. T. Bosman & Mirjam T. C. Ernestus
2021. The role of grammar in spelling homophonous regular verbs. Written Language & Literacy 24:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Binder, Katherine S., Amani Talwar, Nora K. Bond & Nicole Gilbert Cote
Schmitz, Tijn, Robert Chamalaun & Mirjam Ernestus
2018. The Dutch verb-spelling paradox in social media. Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 ► pp. 111 ff.
Verhaert, Nina, Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
2016. The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed. The Mental Lexicon 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee & Cheryl Frenck-Mestre
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
