Cover not available

Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 18:1 (2015) ► pp.153–174

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Orthographic constraints on the spelling of German a-sounds

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.07app
In the framework of the Modular Writing System Theory (Neef 2005a), two levels of representation are distinguished that are relevant for the analysis of phonographic writing systems. These levels are called graphematics and systematic orthography, respectively. In this text, we focus on the latter module. As a case study, we take into account the spelling potential of the German vowels [a] (lax) and [ɑ] (tense). For this purpose, we first discuss the graphematic properties of these two vowels which allows deriving their graphematic solution spaces that capture such spelling variants that are theoretically given in the writing system of German. Subsequently, we use the spelling potential of [a] and [ɑ] to investigate their distribution in the systematic orthography of German. In doing so, we formulate orthographic constraints that regulate the appearance of the spelling variants. These constraints are sensitive for different levels of the German vocabulary. Some of the constraints have already been found relevant for the spelling of other phonemes as well, while others are specific to the two sounds under consideration. This theoretical approach allows analyzing a much broader part of the vocabulary compared to other theories.
References (19)
Balestra, Miriam, Annalen Appelt & Martin Neef (2014). Systematische Beschränkungen für Schreibungen im grammatischen Wortschatz des Deutschen: der Konsonant [f]. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 33(2): 129–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balestra, Miriam & Martin Neef (2011). Measuring graphematic transparency: German and Italian compared. Written Language and Literacy 14(1): 109–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carney, Edward (1994). A survey of English spelling. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duden (2000). Das Aussprachewörterbuch. 5th ed. Mannheim etc.: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa (2012). Einführung in die Schriftlinguistik. 4th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (=UTB 3740). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter (2013). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik, Band 1: Das Wort. 4th ed. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forster, Iris, Susanne R. Borgwaldt & Martin Neef (2012). Form follows function, interjections and onomatopoetica in comics. Writing System Research 41: 122–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nanna (2009). Orthografie. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. (1991). Morphology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neef, Martin (2005a). Die Graphematik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer(= Linguistische Arbeiten 500). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Die phonologischen Einheiten des Deutschen aus Sicht einer Autonomen Deklarativen Phonologie. Linguistische Berichte 2021: 207–249.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Die Schreibung nicht-nativer Eigennamen in einer Schriftsystemtheorie mit einem mehrschichtigen Wortschatzmodell. In Anke Holler & Carmen Scherer (eds.), Strategien der Integration und Isolation nicht-nativer Einheiten und Strukturen, 11–29. Berlin: de Gruyter (= Linguistische Arbeiten 532). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012a). Graphematics as a part of a modular theory on phonographic writing systems. Writing System Research 41: 214–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). Boundaries in written representations: The potential beginning of words in German. In Terry Joyce & David Roberts (eds.), Units of language – units of writing. Special issue of Written Language and Literacy 15(2): 209–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The structure of a theory of writing systems as abstract objects. Ms. TU Braunschweig.
Nerius, Dieter (ed.) (2007). Deutsche Orthographie. 4th ed. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunn, Anneke (1998). Dutch orthography: A systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (2000). The phonology of German. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue