Cover not available

Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 18:1 (2015) ► pp.82–103

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Aer yuo looking cloesly? Even good spellers are impacted by partial cue reading

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.04kwo
Differences in letter string processing between better and relatively poorer (average) spellers were examined. Forty undergraduate students completed a simultaneous orthographic matching task judging pairs of letter strings as same or different. Reading exposure, spelling, and reading habits were measured. Significant differences in reaction times, but not accuracy, were found between the two groups. When the groups were combined, a negative correlation was found between reaction time in the matching task and spelling ability. Taken together, these results suggest that unexpectedly poorer spellers tend to read words based on partial cues, while excellent spellers attend to entire words. Further, results indicate that processing partial vs. full cues may be a continuum, rather than a dichotomy, with even average spellers processing less than do excellent spellers. These results have implications for how unexpectedly poor spellers are defined in research and for the range of individuals who could improve their spelling by processing fuller cues.
References (34)
Acheson, Daniel J., Justine B. Wells & Maryellen C. MacDonald (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods 401: 278–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ackerman, Phillip L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 102(1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, Sally & Rachel Bond (2009). Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity. Reading and Writing 221: 687–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, Sally & Jolyn Hersch (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139(2): 299–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biscaldi, Monica, Stefan Gezeck & Volker Stuhr (1998). Poor saccadic control correlates with dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 36(11): 1189–1202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruck, Maggie & Gloria Waters (1988). An analysis of the spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics 91: 77–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burden, Vivian (1992). Why are some ‘normal’ readers such poor spellers. In Chris M. Sterling & Cliff Robson (eds.), Psychology, spelling, and education, 200-214. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Jennifer S. (2006). Spelling in adults: The combined influences of language skills and reading experience. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 351: 447–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Jennifer S. & Peter Butterworth (1996). Spelling in adults: Orthographic transparency, learning new letter strings and reading accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 8(1): 3-43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Jennifer S. & Mary B. Fury (2000). Spelling in adults: The role of reading skills and experience. Reading and Writing 131: 1-30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Maureen & Zofia Kaminska (1997). Is it misspelled or is it mispelled? The influence of fresh orthographic information on spelling. Reading and Writing 91: 483–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cataldo, Suzanne & Nick Ellis (1988). Interactions in the development of spelling, reading, and phonological skills. Journal of Research in Reading 11(2): 86–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read. Advances in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 71: 121–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. & Julie Rosenthal (2007). Spellings of words: A neglected facilitator of vocabulary learning. Journal of Literacy Research 39(4): 389–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. & Lee S. Wilce (1987). Cipher versus cue reading: An experiment in decoding acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 79(1): 3–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fields, Heather, Sarah Wright & Stanton Newman (1989). Techniques for identifying a group with spelling difficulties in the absence of reading difficulties. The Irish Journal of Psychology 101: 657–663. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foorman, Barbara R. & Yaacov Petscher (2010). Development of spelling and differential relations to text reading in grades 3-10. Assessment for Effective Intervention 36(1): 7–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frith, Uta (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Uta Frith (ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling, 495-515. New York/ London: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Luther C. (1935). A study of the effects of reading on spelling. The Journal of Educational Research 28(8): 570–576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M. & Janine Carruthers (1998). The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. Journal of Memory and Language 391: 264–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M. & Anne E. Castles (2001). Unexpectedly poor spelling in university students. Scientific Studies of Reading 5(4): 319–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M., Aisling M. Malone & Holly Redenbach (2008). Orthographic processing and visual sequential memory in unexpectedly poor spellers. Journal of Research in Reading 31(1): 136-156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M. & Eve Ng (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language 321: 230-257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M. & Lisa Quinn (2009). Unexpectedly poor spelling and phonological processing skill. Scientific Studies of Reading 13(4): 295–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Nancy E. (2005). Are university students’ component reading skills related to their text comprehension and academic achievement? Learning and Individual Differences 151: 113–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Nancy E. & Heidi L. Doellinger (2002). Resilient readers? University students who are poor recoders but sometimes good text comprehenders. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(1): 64–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jorm, Anthony F. (1981). Children with reading and spelling retardation: Functioning of whole-word and correspondence-rule mechanisms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 221: 171–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landi, Nicole (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing 231: 701–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masterson, Jackie, Veronica Laxon, Sophie Lovejoy & Victoria Morris (2007). Phonological skill, lexical decision and letter report performance in good and poor adult spellers. Journal of Research in Reading 30(4): 429-442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormrod, Jeanne E. (1985). Proofreading ‘The Cat in the Hat’: Evidence for different reading styles of good and poor spellers. Psychological Reports 571: 863–867. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990). Comparing good and poor spellers of equal reading and verbal abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills 711: 432-434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapp, Brenda & Kate Lipka (2011). The literate brain: The relationship between spelling and reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(5): 1180–1197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waters, Gloria S., Maggie Bruck & Mark Seidenberg (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 391: 511–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Gary S. & Gary J. Robertson (2006). Wide Range Achievement Test 4. Lutz, FL: Par Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue