Cover not available

Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 18:1 (2015) ► pp.25–55

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Overcoming preferred argument structure in written French

Development, modality, text type

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.02maz
Spoken and written French contrast in many ways. Our goal here is to show how later language development is profoundly impacted by experience with written language. More than 120 French-speakers/ writers, one group of children (mean age: 10;9) and two groups of adolescents (mean age: 12;7 and 15;2), participated in this study. Our analysis of noun phrases is inspired by the hypothesis of Preferred Argument Structure (Du Bois 1987) and examines referential cohesion in texts produced in contexts differing in modality (spoken – written) and text type (expository – narrative). Our aim is to demonstrate: (a) that spoken language production is governed by discursive constraints which control the flow of information; and (b) these discursive constraints differ for written and spoken production. Part of learning to become a literate user of French involves overcoming the discourse constraints governing spoken language production.
References (93)
Aisenman, Ravid & Nurit Assayag (1999). Fact and fiction in evaluating narrative evaluation. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 11: 38–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Shanley, Barbora Skarabela & Mary Hughes (2008). Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. In Heike Behrends (ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives, 99–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aparici, Melina, Liliana Tolchinsky & Elisa Rosado (2000). On defining longer units in narrative and expository Spanish texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 31: 95–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Argerich, Noemi & Liliana Tolchinsky (2000). On a definition of lexical items in written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages 31: 197–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashby, William J. & Paola Bentivoglio (1993). Preferred argument structure in spoken French and Spanish. Language Variation and Change 51: 61–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). A comparative diachronic analysis of French and Spanish. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: grammar as architecture for function, 61–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter (2009). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 311: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bereiter, Carl & Marlene Scardamalia (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth (1997). Preliterate knowledge of language. In Clotilde Portecovo (ed.), Writing development: an interdisciplinary view, 61–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Thematic perspectives on how children talk about interpersonal conflict. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 31: 65–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In Ruth Berman (ed.), Language Development across Childhood and Adolescence, Vol. 31, 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence. In Erika Hoff & Marilyn Shatz (eds.), Handbook of language development, 92–111. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The psycholinguistics of text construction. Journal of Child Language 351: 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Irit Katzenberger (2004). Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 3811: 57–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Bracha Nir-Sagiv (2004). Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 311: 339–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43.2: 79–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Dorit Ravid (2009). Becoming a literate language user oral and written text construction across adolescence. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy, 92–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Dan Slobin (1987). Five ways of learning to talk about events: A crosslinguistic study of children’s narratives. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 46, Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire (1990). Le français parlé. Paris: Edition du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Le semblable et le dissemblable en syntaxe. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 131: 7–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Approche de la langue parlée en français. Gap: Ophrys. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boscolo, Pietro (1990). The construction of expository text. First Language 101: 217–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britton, Bruce K. (1994). Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights. In Morton Ann Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 641–674. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahana-Amitay, Dalia & Ruth Berman (1999). Initial ideas on L(onger)-Units. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 11: 114–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charolles, Michel (1978). Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes. Langue Française 381: 7–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coirier, Pierre, Daniel Gaonac’h & Jean-Michel Passerault (1996). Psycholinguistique textuelle. Paris: Armand Colin Édition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1979). Ergativity. Language 551: 59–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela (1985). Classifier construction and referentiality-marking in Japanese. Paper presented at the Conference on Japanese Language and Linguistics, UCLA.
Du Bois, John (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4): 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003) Argument structure: Grammar in use. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fayol, Michel (1997). Des idées au texte: psychologie cognitive de la production verbale orale et écrite. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, Denise (1974). Français parlé. Analyse des unités phoniques et significatives d’un corpus recueilli dans la région parisienne. Paris: S.E.L.A.F. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise (1989). Le français ordinaire. Paris: Armand Colin éditeur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Une distinction bien fragile: oral/ écrit. TRANEL (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique) 251: 13–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gayraud, Frédérique (2000). Le développement de la différenciation oral/ écrit vu à travers le lexique. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière.
Gayraud, Frédérique, Harriet Jisa & Anne Viguié (2000). The development of syntactic packaging in French children’s written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 11: 169–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & David J. Hargreaves (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language 271: 699–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gineste, Marie-Dominique & Jean-François Le Ny (2002). Psychologie cognitive du langage. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan (1976/1989). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. (1983). Word order universals. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickmann, Maya (1995). Discourse organisation and the development of reference to person, space and time. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The Handbook of child language, 194–218, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Développement de la production verbale orale. In Michel Fayol (ed.), Production du langage, 173–203. Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul (1987). Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157.
Hunt, Kellogg (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 351: iii-67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi (1985). The ‘Given A Constraint’ and the Japanese particle ga. Paper presented at the First Anual Pacific Linguistics Coference, University of Oregon.
Jeanjean, Colette (1980). Les formes sujets de type nominal: étude sur le français contemporain. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Provence.
Jisa, Harriet (1998). Relative clauses in French children’s narrative text. Journal of Child Language 251: 623–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Increasing cohesion in narratives: A developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects in French. Linguistics 381: 591–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jisa, Harriet & Audrey Mazur (2005). The structure and content of noun phrases in French. Paper presented at the Xth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Berlin.
Johansson, Victoria (1999). Word frequencies in speech and writing: A study of expository discourse. Genre and Modality in Developing Discourse Abilities 11: 182–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katzenberger, Irit (2004). The development of clause packaging in spoken and written texts. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1921–1948. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The super-structure of written ewpository texts – A developmental perspective. In Dorit Ravid & Hava Bet-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, 327–336. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khorounjaia, Ekaterina & Liliana Tolchinsky (2004). Discursive constraints on the lexical realization of arguments in Spanish. In Ruth Berman (ed.), Language development across childhood and adolescence, 83–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William (1978/1993). Le parler ordinaire, la langue dans les ghettos noirs des Etats-Unis. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud (1987). On the status of SVO sentences. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 217–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Ny, Jean-François (1979). La sémantique psychologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeman-Bouix, Danielle (1994). Grammaire du verbe français, des formes au sens. Tours: Nathan Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian (1977). Starting points. Language 531: 152–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazur, Audrey (2005). Etude developpementale de la complexité des syntagmes nominaux lexicaux en position sujet. Mémoire de DEA, Université Lumière, Lyon 2.
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey & Harriet Jisa (2012). La complexité lexicale des syntagmes nominaux: une etude développementale. Enfance 41: 359–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosenthal, Peter (1985). Defining the expository discourse continuum, toward a taxinomy of expository text. Poetics 141: 387–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Carole & Allyssa McCabe (1982). Development psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit (2000). NP complexity in the development of text writing. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages 31: 163–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Paper about NP analysis: Conceptualization and methodological issues. Ms., Tel Aviv University.
(2005). Emergence of linguistic complexity in later language development: Evidence from expository text construction. In Dorit Ravid & Hava Bet-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, 337–355. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun scale analyses. Journal of Child Language 331: 791–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Ruth Berman (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity across adolescence: A text-embedded analysis. First Language 301: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Yitzhak Shlesinger (1995). Factors in the selection of compound-types in spoken and written hebrew. Language Sciences 171: 147–179. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit, Janet Van Hell, Elisa Rosado & Anita Zamora (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production. Written Language and Literacy 51: 69–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tayna (1980). Conditions for text coherence. Poetics Today 11: 161–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellat & René Rioul (1994/2002). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneuwly, Bernard (1988). Le langage écrit chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan (1987). Topic management and the lexicon: A discourse profile of three-argument verbs in German. Master thesis, Los Angeles.
Smith, Wendy (1987). Preferred Argument Structure in spoken Hebrew discourse. Master thesis, Los Angeles.
Stewart, Anne (1984). A glance at preferred argument structure in Conchucos Quechua. Master thesis, Los Angeles.
Tolchinsky, Liliana, Victoria Johansson & Anita Zamora (2002). Text openings and closings: Textual autonomy and differentiation. Written Language and Literacy 51: 219–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tolchinsky, Liliana, Joan Perera, Noemi Argerich & Melina Aparici (1999). Rhetorical moves and noun phrase complexity in written expository texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages 11: 257–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trabasso, Tom & Philip C. Rodkin (1994). Knowledge of goal/ plans: A conceptual basis for narrating Frog, where are you? In Ruth A. Berman & Dan I. Slobin (eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study, 85–108. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trabasso, Tom, Tom Secco & Paul W. van den Broek (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In Heinz Mandl, Nancy L. Stein & Tom Trabasso (eds), Learning and comprehension of text, 83–111. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trabasso, Tom & Nancy L. Stein (1997). Narrating, representing, and remembering event sequences. In Paul W. van den Broek, Patricia J. Bauer & Tammy Bourg (eds.), Developmental span in event comprehension and representation. Bridging fictional and actual events, 237–270. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Mazur Palandre, Audrey, Jean-Marc Colletta & Kristine Lund
2021. Alors, là, je vais vous expliquer comment on joue ! Explication procédurale finalisée dans une perspective développementale. Langages N° 221:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Poiret, Rafaël & Haitao Liu
2020. Some quantitative aspects of written and spoken French based on syntactically annotated corpora. Journal of French Language Studies 30:3 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey & Kristine Lund
2019. Chapitre 4. Explication « en comment » d’enfants de 6 ans : les relations temporelles et sémantiques entre les unités linguistiques et gestuelles. In Multimodalité du langage dans les interactions et l’acquisition, ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. La dyslexie à l’âge adulte : la persistance des difficultés orthographiques. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 10003 ff. DOI logo
Ailhaud, Emilie, Florence Chenu & Harriet Jisa
2016. A Developmental Perspective on the Units of Written French. In Written and Spoken Language Development across the Lifespan [Literacy Studies, 11], ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Mazur-Palandre, Audrey, Harriet Jisa, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Maintenir l’information sous forme lexicale : une étude développementale. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 10007 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue