Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 14:2 (2011) ► pp.293–302
What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?
Published online: 8 September 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.2.06ung
Using the Internet and spreadsheet software, it is now easy to compare word and character counts for modern and literary Chinese based on very large corpora. It turns out that word counts comply with Zipf’s Law whereas character counts do not. This constitutes novel statistical evidence against the persistent claim that Chinese characters are logograms. It thus casts doubt on the practice of categorizing the elements of various writing systems as ‘phonograms’ or ‘logograms’ without regard to context, and a fortiori characterizing entire writing systems as ‘phonographic’ or ‘logographic’. Keywords: Chinese; word; character; morpheme; syllable; phonogram; logogram; Zipf’s Law; corpus
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Osterkamp, Sven & Gordian Schreiber
2021. <Th>e ubi<qu>ity of polygra<ph>y and its significan<ce> for <th>e typology of <wr>iti<ng> systems. Written Language & Literacy 24:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
