Article published In: Typology of writing systems
Edited by S. Borgwaldt and Terry Joyce
[Written Language & Literacy 14:1] 2011
► pp. 109–142
Measuring graphematic transparency
German and Italian compared
Published online: 17 February 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.06nee
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.14.1.06nee
In this article, a quantitative method to calculate the graphematic transparency of an alphabetic writing system is suggested. Graphematic transparency is a part of the traditional concept of orthographic depth, dealing with the direction from written representation to phonological representation only. Based on a thorough analysis of German graphematics given in Neef (2005a) and a tentative analysis of Italian graphematics, the respective gt-values are calculated in a constant theoretical framework. As expected, the gt-value for Italian is lower than that for German. For assessing the relevance of these calculated gt-values, further analyses of other writing systems are necessary. Keywords: orthographic depth; graphematic transparency; graphematics; typology; correspondence rule; phonological filter; geminate; German; Italian
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Brasdu, Massimo & Baptiste Jacquet
Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis
McAndrews, M. M. & R. I. Thomson
2017. Establishing an empirical basis for priorities in pronunciation teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 3:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Appelt, Annalen, Miriam Balestra & Martin Neef
2015. Orthographic constraints on the spelling of German a-sounds. Written Language & Literacy 18:1 ► pp. 153 ff.
Marquilhas, Rita
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
