Cover not available

Article In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 28:2 (2025) ► pp.268–296

On-screen L1 and L2 reading among 60+ adults

A pilot study of skimming and scanning

ORCiD logo with link | University of Silesia in Katowice
ORCiD logo with link | University of Silesia in Katowice
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The following multiple-case pilot study examined the single-text comprehension strategies employed by 60+ adults (m = 65.5) when reading a text followed by comprehension tasks on screen in both L1 and L2. Sixteen experienced readers completed a questionnaire assessing their reading preferences in L1 and L2 on-screen and in print. Based on these results, four participants with diverse preferences were selected to read texts on-screen in L1 and L2 and complete comprehension tasks requiring skimming and scanning. Participants’ awareness of reading strategies was evaluated using two questionnaires administered in L1 and L2. The SMI Red 250 eye-tracker recorded their reading behaviour, and the accuracy of their responses was subsequently analysed to assess the effectiveness of the strategies they employed. The cross-case analysis demonstrated that participants’ awareness of existing strategies did not align with their automated use, suggesting that L2 reading instruction for adults 60+ could benefit from explicit teaching of skimming strategies and the supportive ones, such as rereading and double-checking while scanning.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Literature review
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Data collection procedures
    • 2.2Participants
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Perceived proficiency in skimming and scanning in L1 and L2 in print and on-screen
    • 3.2Strategies used in on-screen skimming
    • 3.3Strategies used in on-screen scanning
    • 3.4On-screen skimming and scanning: Key strategies and insights
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion and teaching implications
  • Author queries
  • References
References (51)
References
Andreou, Georgia & Maria Gkantaki (2024). Tracking adults’ eye movements to study text comprehension: A review article. Languages 9(12): 360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bax, Stephen & Cyril J. Weir (2012). Investigating learners’ cognitive processes during a computer-based CAE Reading test. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations Research Notes 471: 3–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beier, Sofie & Chiron Oderkerk (2019). The effect of age and font on reading ability. Visible Language — The Journal of Visual Communication Research 53(3): 50–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britt, Anne M., Jean-François Rouet & Amanda Durik (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunfaut, Tineke & Gareth McCray (2015). Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study. London: The British Council.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, Byeong-Young & Peter Afflerbach (2017). An evolving perspective of constructively responsive reading comprehension strategies in multilayered digital text environments. In Susan E. Israel (ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 109–134. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossland, Michael D. & Gary S. Rubin (2012). Text accessibility by people with reduced contrast sensitivity. Optometry and Vision Science — Journal of the American Academy of Optometry 891: 1276–1281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dakakni, Deema & Neheme Safa (2023). Reading patterns, scanning, and the “Control F”/Search Icon: How students really (don’t) read. International Research in Education 11(1): 128–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Echt, Katharina V. (2001). Designing web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directives. In Roger W. Morell (ed.), Older adults, health information, and the World Wide Web, 61–88. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. (2013). Second language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 365–378. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geva, Esther & Fred Genesee (2006). First-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In Diane August & Timothy Shanahan (eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, 185–196. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, William & Fredricka L. Stoller (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Jana Holsanova, Maria Barthelson & Daniel Lundqvist (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. In Jukka Hyönä, Ralph Radach & Heiner Deubel (eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, 657–670. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka & Joost van de Weijer (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Hsin-Chou (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners’ perceptions of an e-book reading program. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(3): 258–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyönä, Jukka, Robert F. Lorch Jr. & Johanna K. Kaakinen (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(1): 44–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janssen, Caressa, Eliane Segers, James M. McQueen & Ludo Verhoeven (2015). Lexical specificity training effects in second language learners. Language Learning — A Journal of Research in Language Studies 65(2): 358–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khalifa, Hanan & Cyril J. Weir (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koda, Keiko (2005). Insights into second language reading. A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauterman, Tirza & Rakefet Ackerman (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior 351: 455–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Hyo J. & Hyekyung Jung (2019). Factors related to digital reading achievement: A multi-level analysis using international large scale data. Computers & Education 133(C): 82–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Chih-Chung, Vivien Lin, Gi-Zen Liu, Xiaojing Kou, Alena Kulikova & Wen-Yang Lin (2019). Mobile-assisted reading development: A review from the Activity Theory perspective, Computer Assisted Language Learning 33(8): 833–864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Pei-Lin (2014). Using eye tracking to understand learners’ reading process through the concept-mapping learning strategy. Computers & Education 781: 237–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Shaoqian & Xiaohui Sun (2018). A case study on intermediate CSL learners’ word recognition processes and strategies in contextual reading settings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 41(3): 288–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupo, Sarah, Bong G. Jang & Michael McKenna (2017). The relationship between reading achievement and attitudes toward print and digital texts in adolescent readers. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 66(1): 264–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGowan, Victoria A., Sarah J. White & Kevin B. Paterson (2015). The effects of interword spacing on the eye movements of young and older readers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27(5): 609–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohr, Kathleen A. J., Jacob D. Downs & Eric S. Mohr (2020). Mindful reading: Eye-tracking evidence for goal-directed instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 64(3): 301–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mokhtari, Kouider & Carla A. Reichard (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(2): 249–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mokhtari, Kouider & Ravi Sheorey (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education 251: 2–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özer, Esmehan, & Selda Özdemir (2021). The relation between reading performance and eye movement parameters of high-skilled and low-skilled readers. Education and Science 46(208): 395–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paterson, Kevin B., Victoria A. McGowan, Kayleigh L. Warrington, Lin Li, Sha Li, Fang Xie, Min Chang, Sainan Zhao, Ascensión Pagán, Sarah J. White & Jingxin Wang (2020). Effects of normative aging on eye movements during reading. Vision 4(1): 7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, Charles & Suzanne M. Adlof (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In John B. Sabatini, Elizabeth R. Albro & Tenaha O’Reilly (eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability, 3–20. Lonham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piasecka, Liliana K. (2019). When the print meets the screen: Towards a model of L1 and L2 online reading comprehension. Lublin Studies of Modern Languages and Literature 43(3): 45–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prichard, Caleb & Andrew Atkins (2016). Evaluating L2 readers’ previewing strategies using eye tracking. The Reading Matrix — An International Online Journal 16(2): 110–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3): 372–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith, Alexander Pollatsek, Jane Ashby & Charles Clifton Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith, Erik D. Reichle, Michael J. Stroud, Carrick C. Williams & Alexander Pollatsek (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging 211: 448–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, Keith, Sara C. Sereno, Robin K. Morris, A. René Schmauder & Charles Clifton Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4(3–4): 121–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schroeder, Sascha, Jukka Hyönä & Simon P. Liversedge (2015). Developmental eye-tracking research in reading: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27(5): 500–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singhal, Meena (1998). A comparison of L1 and L2 reading: Cultural differences and schema. The Internet TESL Journal 4(10): 4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strukelj, Alexander & Diederick C. Niehorster (2018). One page of text: Eye movements during regular and thorough reading, skimming and spell checking. Journal of Eye Movement Research 11(1): 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supriadin (2025). Strategies for teaching reading comprehension. In Sukarismanti (ed.), Teaching reading: Strategies for developing literacy skills, 109–123, Kabupaten Badung: CV Intellectual Manifes Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taconnat, Laurence, Shasha Morel, Lina Guerrero-Sastoque, Mickaël Frasca & Nicolas Vibert (2020). What eye movements reveal about strategy encoding of words in younger and older adults. Memory 28(4): 537–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Liz (2008). International express. Pre-intermediate. Students’ book (2nd ed.). Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ludo (2017). Learning to read in a second language. In Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton & Rauno K. Parrila (eds.), Theories of reading development, 215–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ludo, Charles A. Perfetti & Ken Pugh (2019). Cross-linguistic perspectives on second language reading, Journal of Neurolinguistics 501: 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, Peter (2018). Teaching and developing reading skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitford, Veronica & Mark F. Joanisse (2018). Do eye movements reveal differences between monolingual and bilingual children’s first-language and second-language reading? A focus on word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1731: 318–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Jiaqi, Kayleigh L. Warrington, Lin Li, Ascensión Pagán, Kevin B. Paterson, Sarah J. White & Victoria A. McGowan (2022). Are older adults more risky readers? Evidence from meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 37(2): 239–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue