Article In: Writing/Reading Interface
Edited by Terry Joyce and Constanze Weth
[Written Language & Literacy 28:1] 2025
► pp. 118–143
The role of morphology in early word reading and spelling
Evidence from Swedish children in Grade 2
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
It has been proposed that morphological knowledge facilitates the integration of sublexical and lexical codes in
both word reading and spelling and mediates the transition from reliance on sublexical cues to lexical cues during early literacy
development (Bahr et al., 2020). However, the specific stage at which morphology begins to influence reading and spelling remains
unclear, as does the question of whether there are differences across languages (Landerl, K., Castles, A., & Parrila, R. (2022). Cognitive
precursors of reading: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 26(2), 111–124. ). In the present study, we explore the extent to which morphology may explain, in addition to the already
known predictors of phonemic awareness (PA) and rapid automatic naming (RAN), individual variations in word reading and spelling
within two groups of Swedish-speaking children identified with word reading difficulties (n = 77) and as typical
reading (n = 59), respectively, in Grade 2. All children participated in standardized assessments of PA,
RAN, morphological awareness (MA), vocabulary, word reading, and spelling at the beginning of Grade 2. Hierarchical
regression analysis was used to investigate whether MA explained any additional variance within the dependent variables of word
reading and spelling when controlling for word-reading group, PA, and RAN. As independent variables, word-reading group, PA, and
RAN were included at the first step and MA was added at the second step. MA was found to have only a modest influence on the
variances for word reading and spelling when controlling for group, PA and RAN. In conclusion, this study of beginning readers and
spellers in Swedish, confirms previous findings that PA makes the more substantial contribution to the variation within early word
reading and spelling, with MA contributing only modestly. These results support the view that phonics should provide the primary
instructional foundations, with MA serving as a complementary component during the first years of literacy instruction.
Keywords: <Please provide missing keywords>
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The role of morphological awareness in the development of word reading and spelling
- 1.2Morphology in relation to the difficulties of word reading and spelling
- 1.3Swedish orthography and morphology
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Procedure
- 2.3Measures
- 2.4Data analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Descriptive statistics for the independent and dependent variables
- 3.2The relationships between phonemic awareness, rapid automatized naming, morphological awareness, and word reading
- 3.3The relationships between phonemic awareness, rapid automatized naming, morphological awareness, and spelling
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1The contribution of MA to the variation in word reading
- 4.2The contribution of MA to the variation in spelling
- 4.3Limitations
- Acknowledgements
- Author queries
References
References (65)
Andersson, J., & Berggren, M. (2013). Paulin
test av fonologisk medvetenhet: En normering samt utvärdering av testet och faktorer som kan påverka
resultat [Master’s thesis, Lund University].
Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The
effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: a study on Italian children. Frontiers
in Psychology, 51, 1373.
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary
development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 58(10), v–165.
Apel, K., & Werfel, K. L. (2014). Using
morphological awareness instruction to improve written language skills. Language, Speech, and
Hearing Services in
Schools, 45(4), 251–260.
Ardanouy, E., Lefèvre, E., Delage, H., & Zesiger, P. (2024). Which
skills underlie French-speaking children’s lexical spelling acquisition in elementary school? Insight from a cross-sectional
exploratory network study from Grade 1 to Grade 5. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 2451, 105963.
Bahr, R. H., Sillian, E. R., Berninger, V. W., & Dow, M. (2012). Linguistic
pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of
Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 55(6), 1587–1599.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth
in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of
Psycholinguistic
Research, 39(2), 141–163.
Bohnacker, U. (2003). Nominal
phrases. In G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, & G. Håkansson (Eds.), The
acquisition of Swedish
grammar, (Vol. 331, pp. 195–260). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brady, S. (2019). The
2003 IDA definition of dyslexia: A call for changes. Perspectives on Language and
Literacy, 45(1), 15–21.
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based
reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian
readers. Cognition, 108(1), 243–262.
Caravolas, M. (2004). Spelling
development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European
Psychologist, 9(1), 3–14.
(2022). Reading
and reading disorders in alphabetic orthographies. In M. J. Snowling, C. Hulme & K. Nation (Eds.), The
science of reading: A handbook (2nd
Ed., pp. 327–353). Wiley Blackwell.
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochi-Quintanilla, E., et al. (2012). Common
patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic
orthographies. Psychological
Science, 231, 678e686.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological
awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological
aspects of language
processing (pp. 189–209). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological
analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and
Writing, 121, 303–335.
Catts, H. W., McIlraith, A., Bridges, M. S., & Nielsen, D. C. (2017). Viewing
a phonological deficit within a multifactorial model of dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An
Interdisciplinary
Journal, 30(3), 613–629.
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2006). Getting
to the root: Young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived
words. Journal of Child
Language, 33(2), 401–417.
Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How
robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading
Psychology, 30(4), 301–318.
Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Mimeau, C. (2019). Morphological
and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia. In L. Verhoeven, C. Perfetti, & K. Pugh (Eds.), Developmental
dyslexia across languages and writing
systems (pp. 327–349). Cambridge University Press.
Defior, S., Alegría, J., Titos, R., & Martos, F. (2008). Using
morphology when spelling in a shallow orthographic system: The case of Spanish. Cognitive
Development, 23(1), 204–215.
Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Gaudreau, P., & Georgiou, G. (2018). Early
contribution of morphological awareness to literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic
consistency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary
Journal, 31(8), 1695–1719.
Dressler, W. U., Ketrez, N. F., & Kilani-Schoch, M. (2017). Discussion
and outlook. In W. U. Dressler, N. F. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Nominal
compound
acquisition (pp. 287–305). John Benjamins.
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The
role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Bulletin of the Orton
Society, 461, 209–240.
Elwér, Å., Fridolfsson, I., Samuelsson, S., & Wiklund, C. (2016). LäSt:
Test i läsförståelse, läsning och stavning för åk
1–6. Hogrefe.
Grigorakis, I., & Manolitsis, G. (2021). Longitudinal
effects of different aspects of morphological awareness skills on early spelling
development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary
Journal, 34(4), 945–979.
Hasenäcker, J., Mousikou, P., & Schroeder, S. (2023). The
role of morphology in reading development. In D. Crepaldi (Ed.), Linguistic
morphology in the mind and
brain (pp. 199–213). Routledge.
Hultman, T. G. 2003. Svenska
Akademiens språklära [The grammar of the Swedish
Academy]. Svenska Akademien.
Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (2018). The
effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary learning, reading, and
spelling. In R. Berthiaume, D. Daigle & A. Desrochers. (Eds.), Morphological
processing and literacy development: Current issues and
research (pp. 217–243). Routledge.
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s
morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary
Journal, 25(2), 389–410.
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Georgiou, G., Geier, K., Chan, J., & Parrila, R. (2025). Effects
of morphological awareness, naming speed, and phonological awareness on reading skills from Grade 3 to Grade
5. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 2531, Article 106188.
Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological
awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational
Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.
Landerl, K., Castles, A., & Parrila, R. (2022). Cognitive
precursors of reading: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 26(2), 111–124.
Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). How
morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy
development. Journal of Research in
Reading, 44(1), 10–26.
Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). Inferring
meaning from meaningful parts: The contributions of morphological skills to the development of children’s reading
comprehension. Reading Research
Quarterly, 54(1), 63–80.
Magnusson, E., & Nauclér, K. (1993). Bedömning
av språklig medvetenhet hos förskolebarn och skolbarn. Pedagogisk design.
Mattes, V., Sommer-Lolei, S., Korecky-Kröll, K., & Dressler, W. U. (Eds.). (2021). The
acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. John Benjamins.
(Eds.). (2021). The
acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. John Benjamins.
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological
skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological
Bulletin, 138(2), 322–352.
Mellenius, I. (1997). The
acquisition of nominal compounding in Swedish. [Doctoral
thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Press.
Melloni, C., & Vender, M. (2022). Morphological
awareness in developmental dyslexia: Playing with nonwords in a morphologically rich
language. PlosONE, 17(11).
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Streiftau, S., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. H. T., Lohvansuu, K., Tóth, D., Honbolygó, F., Csépe, V., Bogliotti, C., Iannuzzi, S., Démonet, J.-F., Longeras, E., Valdois, S., George, F.,… Landerl, K. (2014). Cognitive
mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning
and
Instruction, 291, 65–77.
Mousikou, P., Beyersmann, E., Ktori, M., Javourey-Drevet, L., Crepaldi, D., Ziegler, J. C., Grainger, J., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Orthographic
consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross-linguistic
study. Developmental
Science, 23(6).
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How
many words are there in printed school English. Reading Research
Quarterly, 191, 304–330.
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2013). Morphological
knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Barros, R. (2012). The
development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of
Educational
Psychology, 1041, 959–973.
Pacton, S., & Deacon, S. H. (2008). The
timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from English and
French. Cognitive
Development, 23(3), 339–359.
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From
single to multiple deficit models of developmental
disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413.
Pennington, B. F., Santerre-Lemmon, L., Rosenberg, J., MacDonald, B., Boada, R., Friend, A., Leopold, D. R., Samuelsson, S., Byrne, B., Willcutt, E. G., & Olson, R. K. (2012). Individual
prediction of dyslexia by single versus multiple deficit models. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 121(1), 212–224.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading
ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
Pittas, E., & Nunes, T. (2014). The
relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek: A longitudinal
study. Reading and
Writing, 27(8), 1507–1527.
(2022). Word
Recognition III: Morphological processing. In M. J. Snowling, C. Hulme & K. Nation (Eds.), The
science of reading: A handbook (2nd
Ed., pp. 102–119). Wiley Blackwell.
Rothou, K. M., & Padeliadu, S. (2019). Morphological
processing influences on dyslexia in Greek-speaking children. Annals of
Dyslexia, 69(3), 261–278.
Schiff, R., & Levie, R. (2017). Spelling
and morphology in dyslexia: A developmental study across the school
years. Dyslexia, 231, 324–344.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation
literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of
Psychology, 941, 143–174.
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., & Bonnet, P. (1998). Reading
and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic
factors. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 68(2), 134–165.
Taube, K., Tornéus, M., & Lundberg, I. (1984). UMESOL.
Läsning och skrivning: Läs- och
skrivanalys. Psykologiförlaget.
Treiman, R. (2017). Learning
to spell words: Findings, theories, and issues. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 21(4), 265–276.
Venezky, R. L. (1999). The
American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. Guilford Press.
