Cover not available

Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 26:2 (2023) ► pp.238–265

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Segments and syllables in Hangeul and Thaana

A comparison and optimality theoretic analysis

 | University of Maryland, retired
Published online: 4 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00079.gna
Abstract
This paper compares the little-known writing system Thaana, used for the Maldivian language, with Hangeul, used for Korean. Both were intentional inventions by native speakers in early modern times, and both contain some unique features. Both are segmental in their representation while also arranging their letters into higher-order structures: syllables or CV groupings. These structures obey well-formedness constraints that are well known from the study of phonological (spoken) syllables. This paper argues that the operation of these constraints is evidence that these writing systems employ a grammar, which is analyzed here using Optimality Theory. Thaana and Hangeul use the same syllabification constraints, but the rankings differ between the two systems. The rankings also differ between each writing system and its related spoken language. This paper adds to the growing body of research that applies the tools of linguistic analysis to writing systems and finds evidence of grammar in their structure.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hangeul
  • 3.Thaana
  • 4.Comparison of Hangeul and Thaana
  • 5.Graphic syllables in Hangeul
    • 5.1Description of Hangeul syllables
    • 5.2Introducing syllables in OT
    • 5.3Applying OT to Hangeul syllables
  • 6.Graphic syllables in Thaana
  • 7.OT Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Baroni, Antonio. 2013. “Eye Dialect and Casual Speech Spelling: Orthographic Variation in OT.” Writing Systems Research 5(1):24–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Constraint Interaction and Writing System Typology.” Pp. 296–309 in Écriture(s) et représentations du langage et des langues: Les dossiers d’HEL 9 – 2015, edited by J. Lefebvre, J. Léon, and C. Puech.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena, Thomas J. Conners, and Brook Hefright. 2019. A Descriptive Grammar of Hindko, Panjabi, and Saraiki. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassetti, Benedetta. 2013. “Bilingualism and Writing Systems.” Pp. 649 – 670 in The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, edited by T. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Thomas. 1996. “Arabic Writing.” Pp. 559–64 in The World’s Writing Systems, edited by P. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1999. “A Matter of Typology: Alphasyllabaries and Abugidas.” Written Language & Literacy 2(1):45–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene. 2018. “Core Syllables vs. Moraic Writing.” Written Language & Literacy 21(1):26–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, Sungdai, and John Whitman. 2020. Korean: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chrisomalis, Stephen. 2010. Numerical Notation: A Comparative History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1989. The Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. 1990. “Fundamentals of Grammatology.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 1101:727–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. “The Invention of Writing.” Pp. 579–86 in The World’s Writing Systems, edited by P. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. An Exploration of Writing. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. “Indic Scripts: History, Typology, Study.” Pp. 11–42 in Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography, edited by R. M. Joshi and C. McBride. Springer Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T., and William Bright. 1996. The World’s Writing Systems. edited by P. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeSilva, M. W. Sugathapala. 1969. “The Phonological Efficiency of the Maldivian Writing System.” Anthropological Linguistics 11(7):199–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evertz, Martin. 2018. Visual Prosody: The Graphematic Foot in English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evertz, Martin, and Beatrice Primus. 2013. “The Graphematic Foot in English and German.” Writing Systems Research 5(1):1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gair, James W., and Bruce D. Cain. 1996. “Dhivehi Writing.” Pp. 564–68 in The World’s Writing Systems, edited by P. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ganada Korean Language Institute. 2005. Korean For Foreigners. Seoul: Language PLUS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jochen. 2002. “Optimal Hyphenation.” Pp. 115–30 in The relation of writing to spoken language, edited by M. Neef, A. Neijt, and R. Sproat. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Harjeet Singh. 1996. “The Gurmukhi Script.” Pp. 395–98 in The World’s Writing Systems, edited by P. T. Daniels and W. Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. 2009. The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “Maldivian Thaana, Japanese Kana, and the Representation of Moras in Writing.” Writing Systems Research 4(1):91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017a. Dhivehi: The Language of the Maldives. edited by A. B. David. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017b. “Towards a Typology of Phonemic Scripts.” Writing Systems Research 9(1):14–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021a. “Brahmi’s Children: Variation and Stability in a Script Family.” Written Language & Literacy 24(2):303–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021b. “S1: The Native Script Effect.” Pp. 103–23 in Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century – 2020, edited by Y. Haralambous. Brest: Fluxus Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamann, Silke, and Ilaria E. Colombo. 2017. A Formal Account of the Interaction of Orthography and Perception: English Intervocalic Consonants Borrowed into Italian. Vol. 351. The Author(s).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. 2019. Sinography: The Borrowing and Adaptation of the Chinese Script. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healey, John J. 1998. “The Early Alphabet.” Pp. 197–257 in Reading the Past: Ancient Writing from Cuneiform to the Alphabet, edited by J. T. Hooker. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iyengar, Arvind. Forthcoming “The Akshara as a Graphematic Unit.” forthcoming in Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century – 2022, edited by Y. Haralambous. Brest: Fluxus Editions.
Justeson, John S. 1976. “Universals of Language and Universals of Writing.” Pp. 57–94 in Linguistic Studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, edited by A. G. Juilland, A. M. Devine, and L. D. Stephens. Anma Libri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim-Cho, Sek Yen. 2002. The Korean Alkphabet of 1446 (Hwunmin Cengum): Exposition, OPA, the Visible Speech Sounds, Annotated Translation, Future Applicability. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Jeongsu. 2005. The History and Future of Hangeul: Korea’s Indigenous Script. edited by R. (trans. King. Folkestone, Kent: Global Oriental.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Ji Yea. 2022. “Why [s]? An Analogical Account of the Epenthetic Consonant Quality in Non-Standard Korean.” Pp. 71–81 in Japanese/Korean Linguistics 291, edited by K. Horie, K. Akita, Y. Kubota, D. Y. Oshima, and A. Utsugi. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledyard, Gari K. 1966. “The Korean Language Reform of 1446: The Origin, Background, and Early History of the Korean Alphabet.” University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “The International Linguistic Background of the Correct Sounds for the Instruction of the People.” Pp. 31–87 in The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited by Y.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hyun Bok. 1999. “Korean.” Pp. 120–23 in Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, edited by International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Kee-Moon. 1997. “The Inventor of the Korean Alphabet.” Pp. 11–30 in The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited by Y.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Sang-Oak. 1997. “Graphical Ingenuity in the Korean Writing System: With New Reference to Calligraphy.” Pp. 107–16 in The Korean alphabet: Its history and structure, edited by Y.-K. Kim-Renaud. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maloney, Clarence. 1980. People of the Maldive Islands. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993. “Generalized Alignment.” P. 79–153 in Yearbook of Morphology, edited by G. Booij and J. van Marle. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology.” Pp. 218–309 in The Prosody-Morphology Interface, edited by R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, Dimitrios. 2019. “The Grapheme as a Universal Basic Unit of Writing.” Writing Systems Research 11(1):26–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. The Nature of Writing : A Theory of Grapholinguistics. Vol. 31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohamed, Naseema. 1999. Dhivehi Writing Systems. Malé: National Centre for Linguistic and Historical Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, James. 2019. The Grammar of Chinese Characters: Productive Knowledge of Formal Patterns in an Orthograhic System. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pae, Hye K. 2011. “Is Korean a Syllabic Alphabet or an Alphabetic Syllabary?” Writing Systems Research 3(2):103–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 2004. “A Featural Analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet.” Written Language & Literacy 7(2):235–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimzhim, Anurag, Leonard Katz, and Carol A. Fowler. 2014. “Brāhmī-Derived Orthographies Are Typologically Āksharik but Functionally Predominantly Alphabetic.” Writing Systems Research 61:41–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2015. Writing Systems. Second. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Hye Jeong, and Richard Wiese. 2010. “Resistance to Complexity Interacting with Visual Shape – German and Korean Orthography.” Writing Systems Research 2(2):87–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 2000. A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephens, Laurence, and John S. Justeson. 1978. “Reconstructing ‘Minoan’ Phonology: The Approach from Universals of Language and Universals of Writing Systems.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 1081:271–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taft, Marcus. 1979. “Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code: The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS).” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 181:21–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup, and M. Martin Taylor. 2014. Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Revised Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UNESCO. 1986. Literacy Situation in Asia and the Pacific: Country Studies: Maldives. Bankok: UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 2005. “How to Optimize Orthography.” Written Language & Literacy 7(2):305–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Share, David L.
2025. Blueprint for a Universal Theory of Learning to Read: The Combinatorial Model. Reading Research Quarterly 60:2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Further Reading. In The Writing Revolution, ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue