Article published In: Spelling Acquisition in Cross-linguistic Settings
Edited by Susie Russak and Elena Zaretsky
[Written Language & Literacy 25:1] 2022
► pp. 40–66
Concurrent predictors of spelling accuracy in secondary education in a semi-consistent orthography
The role of non-phonological spelling strategies
Published online: 7 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00060.sal
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00060.sal
Abstract
Spelling is a complex skill that requires mobilizing various levels of linguistic and orthographic representation. While there is substantial evidence of the impact of phonological skills in its development, less is known about the explanatory value of non-phonological (e.g., morphological, orthographic) strategies in conventional spelling scores. This study assessed the unique impact of non-phonological spelling strategies after accounting for a large set of linguistic and cognitive predictors, as well as contextual variables (e.g., SES) in a language with a semi-consistent orthography: Catalan. Participants were 328 eighth-grade students from low-income households. Results showed that non-phonological spelling skills explained a substantial proportion of the variance in conventional spelling, over and above the rest of predictor variables, including phonographic skills, with the final model explaining more than 80% of the variance. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Spelling is best looked at from strategy use
- 1.2Several skills underlie conventional spelling accuracy
- 1.3Catalan orthography
- 1.4The current study
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Tasks and measures
- 2.2.1Raven’s matrices
- 2.2.2Verbal short-term memory
- 2.2.3Working memory
- 2.2.4Inhibition
- 2.2.5RAN
- 2.2.6Vocabulary
- 2.2.7Morphosyntax
- 2.2.8Word reading
- 2.2.9Handwriting
- 2.2.10Spelling
- 2.3Procedure
- 3.Results
- 3.1Non-phonological spelling strategies
- 3.2Predictors of conventional spelling
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (61)
Alamargot, Denis, & Lucile Chanquoy. (2001). Through the models of writing: with commentaries by Ronald T. Kellogg & John R. Hayes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Alloway, Tracy P. & David Gregory. (2013). The predictive ability of IQ and Working Memory scores in literacy in an adult population. International Journal of Educational Research 571: 51–56,
Alves, Rui A., Limpo, Teresa, Salas, Naymé, & Joshi, R. Malatesha. (2018). Handwriting and spelling. In S. Graham, Ch. A. MacArthur, & M. Hebert (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction, 211–239, Routledge.
Apel, Kenn, Elizabeth B. Wilson-Fowler, Danielle Brimo, & Nancy A. Perrin. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and writing 251: 1283–1305,
Bahr, Ruth H., Elaine R. Silliman, Virginia W. Berninger, & Michael Dow. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1– 9. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 551: 1587–1599,
Bahr, Ruth H., Ellaine R. Silliman, Robin L. Danzak, & Loise Wilkinson. (2015). Bilingual spelling patterns in middle school: it is more than transfer. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 181: 73–91,
Bel, Aurora. (2003). The syntax of subjects in the acquisition of Spanish and Catalan. Probus 151: 1–26,
Berninger, Virginia, Cheryl Yates, Ana Cartwright, Judith Rutberg, Elizabeth Remy, & Robert Abbott. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing 41: 257–280,
Berninger, Virginia W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly 221: 99–112,
Brandenburg, Janin, Julia Klesczewski, Anne Fischbach, Kirsten Schuchardt, Gerhard Büttner, & Marcus Hasselhorn. (2015). Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling. Searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities 481: 622–634,
Caravolas, Markéta, Arne Lervåg, Petroula Mousikou, Corina Efrim, Miroslav Litavský, Eduardo Onochie-Quintanilla, et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science 231: 678–686,
Caravolas, Markéta & Anna Samara. (2015). Learning to read and spell words in different writing systems. The Oxford Handbook of Reading: 326–343.
Cuetos, Fernando, David Arribas, & José Luis Ramos. (2016). PROLEC-SE-R–Batería para la evaluación de los procesos lectores en secundaria y bachillerato-revisada. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Cutler, Anne, Dennis Norris, & Núria Sebastián-Gallés. (2004). Phonemic repertoire and similarity within the vocabulary. In 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2004-ICSLP): 65–68. Seoul: Sunjijn Printing Co.
Deacon, S. Hélène, Nicole Conrad, & Sébastien Pacton. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology 491: 118–124,
Deacon, S. Hélène, John R. Kirby, Melissa Casselman-Bell. (2009). How Robust is the Contribution of Morphological Awareness to General Spelling Outcomes? Reading Psychology, 301: 301–318,
Defior, Sylvia, Jesús Alegría, Rosa Titos, & Francisco Martos. (2008). Using morphology when spelling in a shallow orthographic system: the case of Spanish. Cognitive Development 231: 204–215,
Devonshire, Victoria, Paula Morris, & Michael Fluck. (2013). Spelling and reading development: the effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction 251: 85–94,
Ding, Yuan, Liping Li, & Xinchun Wu. (2020). The reciprocal relationship between handwriting fluency and spelling accuracy in Chinese: A longitudinal study.” Frontiers in Psychology 111,
Dixon, Wilfrid J. & Kareb K. Yuen. (1974). Trimming and winsorization: A review. Statistische Hefte 151: 157–170,
Ferreiro, Emilia & Ana Teberosky. (1979). Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. Buenos Aires:Siglo XXI.
Field, Andy. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock’n’roll). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Ganzeboom, Harry B. G., Paul M. De Graaf, & Donalnd J. Treiman. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research 211: 1–56,
Gillis, Steven, and Dorit Ravid. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: a crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language 331: 621–659,
Johnson, Adam C., Joshua Wilson, & Rod D. Roscoe. (2017). College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics. Assessing Writing 341: 72–87,
Kandel, Sonia, & Cyril Perret. (2015). How does the interaction between spelling and motor processes build up during writing acquisition? Cognition 1361: 325–336,
Kim, Young-Suk, Stephanie Al Otaiba, Cynthia Puranik, Jessica Sidler Folsom, & Luana Gruelich. (2014). The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Reading & writing 271: 237–253,
Kline, Rex B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lervåg, Arne & Charles Hulme. (2010). Predicting the Growth of early spelling skills: Are there heterogeneous developmental trajectories? Scientific Studies of Reading 141: 485–513,
Lew-Williams, Casey & Jenny R. Saffran. (2012). All words are not created equal: Expectations about word length guide infant statistical learning. Cognition 1221: 241–246,
Llauradó, Anna, M. Antònia Martí, & Liliana Tolchinsky. (2012). Corpus CesCa: compiling a corpus of written Catalan produced by school children. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 171: 428–441,
Llauradó, Anna & Liliana Tolchinsky. (2016). The developmental pattern of spelling in Catalan from first to fifth school grade. Writing Systems Research 81: 64–83,
McCutchen, Deborah. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist 351: 13–23,
Menichelli, Alina, Brend Rapp, and Carlo Semenza. (2008). Allograph agraphia: A case study. Cortex, 441: 861–868,
Nunes, Terezinha, Peter Bryant, and Myriam Bindman. (1997a). Morphological spelling strategies: developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology 331: 637–649,
Pacton, Sébastien, and S. Hélène Deacon. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: a review of evidence from English and French. Cognitive Development 231: 339–359,
Pritchard, Verena E., Stephanie A. Malone & Charles Hulme. (2020). Early Handwriting Ability Predicts the Growth of Children’s Spelling, but Not Reading, Skills. Scientific Studies of Reading,
Rapp, Brenda and Alfonso Caramazza. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 231: 1130–1152,
Read, Charles. (1971). Pre-school children’s knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review 411: 1–34,
Richards, Todd L., Elizabeth H. Aylward, Katherine M. Field, Amie C. Grimme, Wendy Raskind, Anne L. Richards, William Nagy et al. (2006). Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental neuropsychology 301: 547–589,
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany, and Robert S. Siegler. (1999). Learning to spell: variability, choice, and change in children’s strategy use. Child Development 701: 332–348,
Salas, Naymé. (2020). Non-phonological strategies in spelling development. Frontiers in Psychology, 111, 1071.
Salas, Naymé, & Silvente, Sara. (2020). The role of executive functions and transcription skills in writing: A cross-sectional study across 7 years of schooling. Reading and Writing, 33(4), 877–905.
Savage, Robert, Vanitha Pillay, & Santo Melidona. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities 411: 235–250,
Schloneger, Rachel M. (2016). Is this author intelligent? The effect of spelling errors on perception of authors. Linguistics Senior Research Projects 21: 1–29.
Sénéchal, Monique. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 541:76–86,
Shanahan, Timothy. (1984). Nature of the reading–writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 761: 466–477.
Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R. H., and Peters, M. L. (2006). Spelling patterns in preadolescents with atypical language skills: phonological, morphological, and orthographic factors. Dev. Neuropsychol. 291, 93–123.
Strauss, Esther, Elizabeth M. S. Sherman, & Otfried Spreen. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press
Suárez-Coalla, Paz, Marta Álvarez-Cañizo, and Fernando Cuetos. (2016). Orthographic learning in Spanish children. Journal of Research in Reading, 391: 292–311,
Sumner, Emma, Vincent Connelly, & Anna L. Barnett. (2014). The influence of spelling ability on handwriting production: Children with and without dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 401: 1441,
Tainturier, M. J., & B. C. Rapp. (2004). Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Neurocase 101: 122–131.
Tolchinsky, Liliana, Iris Levin, Dorit Aram, & Chatherine McBride-Chang. (2012). Building literacy in alphabetic, abjad and morphosyllabic systems. Reading and Writing, 251: 1573–1598,
Treiman, Rebecca, Jacqueline Hulslander, Richard K. Olson, Erik G. Willcutt, Brian Byrne, & Brett Kessler. (2019). The unique role of early spelling in the prediction of later literacy performance. Scientific Studies of Reading 231: 437–444,
Treiman, Rebecca. (2004). Phonology and spelling. In Terezinha Nunes & Peter Bryant (eds), Handbook of Children’s Literacy, 31–42. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
. (2017). Learning to spell words: findings, theories, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading 211: 265–276,
