Article published In: Diversity in Writing Systems: Embracing multiple perspectives
Edited by Amalia E. Gnanadesikan and Anna P. Judson
[Written Language & Literacy 24:2] 2021
► pp. 284–302
How children learn to use a writing system
Mapping evidence from an Indic orthography to written language in children’s books
Published online: 21 January 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00056.nag
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00056.nag
Abstract
Decoding a writing system is an impressive task requiring recognition of connections between printed symbols and the language they represent. Recognising the linguistic anchors for individual symbols is however not enough. Inferences are needed about unseen and often unstated encoding principles. This paper reviews task demands implicit in children’s books and find the models of orthographic learning in an Indic writing system must go beyond a focus on intra-symbol cues, the size of the symbol set, and the nature of sound-symbol mapping. The child-directed print corpus also shows a substantial demand for recognition of multimorphemic words. Since children encounter an ever-expanding variety of such words in the books they read, it is essential to mount systematic studies on morphological development. At a methodological level, this exploratory study shows the limitations of building models of literacy development when real world encounters with a writing system are not adequately taken into account.
Article outline
- 1.A sketch of an Indic orthography
- 1.1Symbol blocks and intra-symbol processing
- 1.2Orthographic breadth and orthographic depth
- 1.3Hidden encoding principles
- 2.Written language in children’s books
- 2.1A child-directed print corpus
- 2.2The written language: Key characteristics
- 2.2.1The language is morphologically rich
- 2.2.2Morpho-phonological changes occur in many words
- 2.2.3The word lengths are not that short
- 2.2.4The symbol set includes low and high frequency akshara
- 2.2.5The mapping of sound-to-symbol is mixed
- 3.Developmental evidence on learning to read
- 3.1Symbol knowledge
- 3.2Visual word recognition skills
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (44)
Bright, W. (Ed.). (1992). International Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1996). Kannada and Telugu writing. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright, The World’s Writing Systems, 413–419. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cho, J. R., McBride, C. & Kim, B. (2020). Effective teaching instructions for Hangul learning among Korean kindergartners. Reading and Writing 331: 1791–1808.
Coates, J. (2017). The Effect of Story Grammar Contained in Wordless Picture Books: A Study of Children’s Narrative. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Oxford, UK.
Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 1101: 727–731.
Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 1111: 662–720.
Hayes, D. P., & Ahrens, M. G. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of ‘motherese’? Journal of Child Language 151: 395–410.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behaviour and Brain Science 33(2–3): 61–83.
Hyönä, J., Yan, M., & Vainio, S. (2018). Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(1): 122–130.
Inoue, T., Georgiou, G. K., Muroya, N., Maekawa, H. and Parrila, R. (2017). Cognitive predictors of literacy acquisition in syllabic Hiragana and morphographic Kanji. Reading and Writing 301: 1335–1360.
Kinoshita, S., Yu, L., Verdonschot, R. G., & Norris, D. (2021). Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters. Memory and Cognition 118(3): 1–11.
Manolitsis, G., Georgiou, G. K., Inoue, T. & Parrila, R. (2019). Are morphological awareness and literacy skills reciprocally related? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Educational Psychology 111(8): 1362–1381.
Massaro, D. W. (2015). Two different communication genres and implications for vocabulary development and learning to read. Journal of Literacy Research 471: 505–527.
Miller, G. A., Newman, E. B. & Friedman, E. A. (1958). Length-frequency statistics in written English. Information and Control 11: 370–389.
Montag, J. L. (2019). Differences in sentence complexity in the text of children’s picture books and child-directed speech. First Language 39(5): 527–546.
Montag, J. L., Jones, M. N., & Smith, L. B. (2015). The words children hear: Picture books and the statistics for language learning. Psychological Science 26(9): 1489–1496.
Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading 301: 7–22.
(2014). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster. Writing Systems Research 61: 105–119.
(2017a). Learning to read alphasyllabaries. In K. Cain, D. Compton, & R. Parrila (eds.), Theories of Reading Development. Netherlands: John Benjamins.
(2017b). Learning to Read Kannada and Other Languages of South Asia. In L. Verhoeven & C. Perfetti (eds.), Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems, 82–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nag, S. & Narayanan, B. (2019). Orthographic knowledge, spelling and reading development in Tamil: the first three years. In M. Joshi & C. McBride (eds), Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nag, S. & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Reading and writing: Insights from the alphasyllabaries of South and Southeast Asia. Writing Systems Research 6(1): 1–9.
Nag, S. & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Reading comprehension, decoding and oral language, The EFLU Journal, English and Foreign Languages University 2(2): 75–93.
Nag, S., Snowling, M. J. & Mirkovic, J. (2018a). The role of language production mechanisms in children’s sentence repetition: Evidence from an inflectionally rich language. Applied Psycholinguistics 39(2): 303–325.
Nag, S., Snowling, M. J., Quinlan, P. & Hulme, C. (2014). Child and symbol factors in learning to read a visually complex writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading 181: 1–16.
Nag, S., Vagh, S. B., Dulay, K. M. & Snowling, M. J. (2018b). Home language, school language and children’s literacy attainments: a systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries, Review of Education 71: 91–150.
Nag, S., Vagh, S. B., Dulay, K. M. & Snowling, M. J., Donolato, E. & Melby-Lervag, M. (in preparation). Home attributes that relate to language and literacy attainments: A systematic review of studies from low- and middle-income countries.
Pearce, W. M. (2003). Does the choice of stimulus affect the complexity of children’s oral narratives? Speech Language Pathology 5(2): 95–103.
Prabhu, R. D. (2019.7.14). Children’s literature in India undergoes revolution as publishers experiment with regional languages, genres. First Post. [URL]
Promise Print Corpus (Februaru, 2020). A Child-Directed Print Corpus of Kannada Books. Bangalore, India: The Promise Foundation.
Ranganatha, M. R. (1982). Morphophonemic analysis of the Kannada language: Relative frequency of phonemes and morphemes in Kannada. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
Rastle, K., Lally, C., & Lee, C. H. (2019). No flexibility in letter position coding in Korean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 45(4): 458–473.
Saarela, M. S. (2014). The Manchu script and information management: Some aspects of Qing China’s great encounter with alphabetic literacy. In B. A. Elman (Ed.), Rethinking East Asian languages, vernaculars, and literacies, 1000–1919, 169–197. Leiden: Brill.
Shankar, K. (2018.2.17). Bright prospects for children’s publishing in India. In The Hindu, [URL]
Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children’s picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology 27(6): 960–974.
Share, D. L. & Daniels, P. T. (2015). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries,abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014), Writing Systems Research 8(1): 17–31.
Sircar, S. & Nag, S. (2014). Akshara-syllable mappings in Bengali: a language-specific skill for reading. In H. Winskel & P. Padakannaya (Eds), South and Southeast Asian Psycholinguistics, 409–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Y., McBride, C., Zhou, Y., Joshi, M., & Farver, J. (2018). Becoming literate in Chinese: A comparison of native and non-native speaking children. Journal of Research in Reading 411: 511–524.
Wijaythilake, M. A. D. K., Parrila, R., Inoue, T. & Nag, S. (2019). Cognitive predictors of word reading in Sinhala. Reading and Writing 321: 1881–1907.
Wijaythilake, M. A. D. K. & Parrila, R. (2019). Reading and writing Sinhala. In R. M. Joshi & C. McBride (eds), Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography, 195–216. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Share, David L.
Joy, Jeena Mary, Lakshmi Venkatesh, Samuel N. Mathew & Swapna Narayanan
Saiegh-Haddad, Elinor
Verhoeven, Ludo, Sonali Nag, Charles Perfetti & Kenneth Pugh
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
