Cover not available

Article published In: Diversity in Writing Systems: Embracing multiple perspectives
Edited by Amalia E. Gnanadesikan and Anna P. Judson
[Written Language & Literacy 24:2] 2021
► pp. 259–283

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Areal script form patterns with Chinese characteristics

 | National Chung Cheng University
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00055.mye
Abstract
It has often been claimed that writing systems have formal grammars structurally analogous to those of spoken and signed phonology. This paper demonstrates one consequence of this analogy for Chinese script and the writing systems that it has influenced: as with phonology, areal script patterns include the borrowing of formal regularities, not just of formal elements or interpretive functions. Whether particular formal Chinese script regularities were borrowed, modified, or ignored also turns out not to depend on functional typology (in morphemic/syllabic Tangut script, moraic Japanese katakana, and featural/phonemic/syllabic Korean hangul) but on the benefits of making the borrowing system visually distinct from Chinese, the relative productivity of the regularities within Chinese character grammar, and the level at which the borrowing takes place.
Article outline
  • 1.Areal phonological patterns and areal script patterns
  • 2.Chinese character phonology
  • 3.Borrowing, modifying, and ignoring formal Chinese character regularities
    • 3.1Tangut script
    • 3.2Japanese katakana
    • 3.3Korean hangul
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Ahn, Jinsu. (2017). The dynamism of Hangeul’s vertical strokes and the flow of its lines of writing. Visible Language 51(3–1): 56–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2001). Areal diffusion, genetic inheritance, and problems of subgrouping: A North Arawak case study. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 167–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. (1994). Spelling as culture. In W. C. Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition, 67–86. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Jan Edwards. (1990). Lengthening and shortening and the nature of prosodic constituency. In John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 152–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berent, Iris. (2013). The phonological mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(7): 319–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. (2017). Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of areal linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. (2011). Sign language phonology. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (second edition), 691–721. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Changizi, Mark A., Qiong Zhang, Hao Ye, & Shinsuke Shimojo. (2006). The structures of letters and symbols throughout human history are selected to match those found in objects in natural scenes. The American Naturalist 167(5): E117–E139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. (2001). Writing systems. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 43–80. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2001). Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: An African perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 358–392. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evertz, Martin. (2018). Visual prosody: The graphematic foot in English and German. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nanna, Franziska Buchmann & Kristian Berg. (2011). The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English. Written Language & Literacy 14(2): 275–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galambos, Imre. (2015). Translating Chinese tradition and teaching Tangut culture: Manuscripts and printed books from Khara-Khoto. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J. (1963). A study of writing (revised edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-Cherng. (1982). Chinese elements in the Tangut script. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 53(1): 167–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. (2019). Sinography: The borrowing and adaptation of the Chinese script. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansell, Mark. (2002). Functional answers to structural problems in thinking about writing. In Mary S. Erbaugh (ed.), Difficult characters: Interdisciplinary studies of Chinese and Japanese writing, 124–264. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon & Ellen M. Kaisse (eds.) (1993). Studies in lexical phonology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. (1931). Über die phonologischen Sprachbünde. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 41: 234–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Zong-Su. (2005). The history and future of Hangeul: Korea’s indigenous script [translated by Ross King]. Folkestone: Global International, Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Ross. (1996). Korean writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.) The world’s writing systems, 218–227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohrt, Manfred. (1986). The term ‘grapheme’ in the history and theory of linguistics. In Gerhard Augst (ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography, 80–96. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kychanov, E. I. (1996). Tangut. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 228–230, 237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Chia-Ying, Jie-Li Tsai, Yu-Chin Chiu, Ovid J. L. Tzeng & Daisy L. Hung. (2006). The early extraction of sublexical phonology in reading Chinese pseudocharacters: An event-related potentials study. Language and Linguistics 7(3): 619–636.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Fanwen. (1997). Xià-Hàn Zìdiǎn [Tangut-Chinese dictionary] (first edition). Beijing: China Society Science Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Xià-Hàn Zìdiǎn [Tangut-Chinese dictionary] (second edition). Beijing: China Society Science Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. (1994). Some graphotactic constraints. In W. C. Watt (ed.), Writing systems and cognition: Perspectives from psychology, physiology, linguistics, and semiotics, 115–127. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019). The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11(1) 26–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyake, Marc. (2017a). Minority languages: Traditional and modern writing systems. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. III1, 35–40. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2017b). Tangut language. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. IV1, 267–274. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morin, Olivier. (2018). Spontaneous emergence of legibility in writing systems: The case of orientation anisotropy. Cognitive Science 42(2): 664–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, James. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ninio, Anat & Amia Lieblich. (1976). The grammar of action: ‘Phrase structure’ in children’s copying. Child Development 47(3): 846–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pacton, Sébastien, Pierre Perruchet, Michel Fayol & Axel Cleeremans. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(3): 401–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peng, Xuanwei. (2017). Stroke systems in Chinese characters: A systemic functional perspective on simplified regular script. Semiotica 2017 (218): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet. Written Language & Literacy 7(2): 235–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qiu, Xigui. (2000). Chinese writing [Compiled and translated by Gilbert L. Mattos & Jerry Norman]. Berkeley: The Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. (1993). A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology 10(2): 243–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S., David C. Plaut, Alan S. Petersen, James L. McClelland & Ken McRae. (1994). Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20(6): 1177–1196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. (1996). The Yi Script. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 239–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Ki Joong. (1998). The writing systems of Northeast Asia and the origin of the Korean alphabet, Han’gŭl. Seoul Journal of Korean Studies 111: 3–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tranter, Nicolas. (2001). Script ‘borrowing’, cultural influence and the development of the written vernacular in East Asia. In Thomas E. McAuley (ed.), Language change in East Asia, 180–204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). The ‘ideal square’ of logographic scripts and the structural similarities of Khitan script and han’gŭl. In Sang-oak Lee, Gregory K. Iverson, with Sang-cheol Ahn & Young-mee Yu Cho (eds.), Pathways into Korean language and culture: Essays in honor of Young-key Kim-Renaud, 503–522. Seoul: Pagijong Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Kuan-Chan & Terezinha Nunes. (2003). The role of character schema in learning novel Chinese characters. In Catherine McBride-Chang & Hsuan-Chih Chen (eds.), Reading development in Chinese children, 109–125. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseng, Yuho. (1993). A history of Chinese calligraphy. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsukishima, Hiroshi. (1977). Dairokushō katakana no jigen [Chapter 6: The origin of katakana]. In Hiroshi Tsukishima, Kokugo no rekishi [History of Japanese], 81–108. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). Katakana no rekishi-teki kenkyū [Historical study of Japanese ‘kata-kana’ characters]. Nihon Gakushiin Kiyō [Transactions of the Japan Academy] 51(3): 227–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Esch. (2017). Nǚshū (Women’s script). In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. III1, 262–267. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard L. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly 2(3): 75–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Jason Chia-Sheng. (1983). Toward a generative grammar of Chinese character structure and stroke order. University of Wisconsin-Madison Ph.D. thesis.
Watt, W. C. (1975). What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? I: Desiderata. Visible Language 9(4): 293–327.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand. Semiotica 2015 (207): 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitman, John. (2011). The ubiquity of the gloss. Scripta 31: 95–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jeroen. (2017). Script reform (20th Century): History and analysis. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. III1, 671–676. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. (2004). How to optimize orthography. Written Language & Literacy 7(2): 305–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Yingzhe & Juha Janhunen. (2014). New materials on the Khitan small script: A critical edition of Xiao Dilu & Yelü Xiangwen. Folkestone: Global Oriental.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Liming. (1998). Nüshu: Chinese women’s characters. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1291: 127–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue