Cover not available

Article published In: Diversity in Writing Systems: Embracing multiple perspectives
Edited by Amalia E. Gnanadesikan and Anna P. Judson
[Written Language & Literacy 24:2] 2021
► pp. 171–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

<Th>e ubi<qu>ity of polygra<ph>y and its significan<ce> for <th>e typology of <wr>iti<ng> systems

 | Ruhr University Bochum
 | Ruhr University Bochum
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00052.ost
Abstract
It has often been assumed that there is, or should be, a one-to-one correspondence between graphs and linguistic units in writing systems as the norm. This is not merely doubtful in terms of descriptive accuracy. Conceptualizing writing systems in such a way also has profound consequences for the application of typological categories to specific cases. In this paper we first suggest a working definition of polygraphy, also touching upon its demarcation from adjacent concepts such as ligatures and diacritics. Having demonstrated that polygraphy is in fact fundamental to a significant number of typologically diverse writing systems, we argue in favor of a typology of writing systems taking the ubiquity of polygraphy into due account, with definitions going beyond one-to-one correspondences as the default.
Article outline
  • 1.The origins of polygraphs
  • 2.The ideal of one-to-one correspondences
  • 3.The ubiquity of polygraphy in writing systems
    • 3.1Polygraphy in segmental systems
    • 3.2Polygraphy in syllabic systems
    • 3.3Polygraphy in morphographic systems
  • 4.Transparency of polygraphs
  • 5.Analysis of writing systems vs. analysis of language
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (65)
References
Adam, Isabell. (2014). Digraph. In Martin Neef, Rüdiger Weingarten & Said Sahel (eds.), Schriftlinguistik. Berlin: De Gruyter. [URL]
Bailey, Nathan. (1730). Dictionarium Britannicum: Or a More Compleat Universal Etymological English Dictionary Than Any Extant. London: T. Cox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. (1950). Studies in Colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics. Language 26.1: 86–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, Greg. (2015). Dictionary of the British English Spelling System. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carney, Edward. (2012). A Survey of English Spelling. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. (1968). Language and Symbolic Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Liwei. (2003). Nitchū ryōgengo-no kōshō-ni miru jukujikun-no keisei. Kokugogaku 54.3: 30–43. [URL]
Colomo, Katarina. (2013). Mehrgraph. In Martin Neef, Rüdiger Weingarten & Said Sahel (eds.), Schriftlinguistik. Berlin: De Gruyter. [URL]
Coulmas, Florian. (1996). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Writing Systems. An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. (1990). Fundamentals of Grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110.4: 727–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). On beyond alphabets. Written Language & Literacy 9.1: 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). An exploration of writing. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright (eds.) (1996). The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John. (1989). Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony. (1996). Thai and Lao Writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 457–466. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Halde, Jean-Baptiste. (1736). The General History of China, vol. 21. London: Watts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallmann, Peter. (1986). The graphic elements of German written language. In Gerhard Augst (ed.), New Trends in Graphemics and Orthography, 43–79. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2009). The Writing Revolution. Cuneiform to the Internet. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Maldivian Thaana, Japanese kana, and the representation of moras in writing. Writing Systems Research 4.1: 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research 9.1: 14–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haarmann, Harald. (1989). Symbolic Values of Foreign Language Use. From the Japanese Case to a General Sociolinguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1976). Writing: The basic options. In W. Haas (ed.), Writing without letters, 131–208. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handel, Zev. (2015). Logography and the classification of writing systems: A response to Unger. Scripta 71: 109–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A. (1967). The typology of writing systems. In William M. Austin (ed.), Papers in Linguistics in Honor of Léon Dostert, 92–99. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honda, Keisuke. (2007). Kana digraphs and morae. A structural analysis. Written Language & Literacy 10.1: 65–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). On the moraic nature of hiragana and katakana. Tsukuba ōyō gengogaku kenkyū 181: 33–46. [URL]
. (2019). What Do Kanji Graphs Represent in the Current Japanese Writing system? Towards a Unified Model of Kanji as Written Signs. In Yannis Haralambous (ed.), Graphemics in the 21st Century. Brest, June 13–15, 2018. Proceedings, 185–208. Brest: Fluxus Editions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabashima, Tadao. (1977). Moji-no taikei-to kōzō. In Ōno Susumu & Shibata Takeshi (eds.), Iwanami kōza Nihongo, vol. 8: Moji, 23–60. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1979). Nihon-no moji: hyōki taikei-o kangaeru. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko. (1950). ‘Gooku’ to ‘gōku’: hiki-onsetsu-no teishō. Kokugo-to kokubungaku 27.1: 46–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius. (1667). China monumentis […] illustrata. Amsterdam: Meurs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkby, John. (1746). A New English Grammar, or, Guide to the English Tongue. London: R. Manby and H. S. Cox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis. (2008). A brief note on diacritics. Written Language & Literacy 11.1: 90–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Ki-Moon & S. Robert Ramsey. (2011). A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsunaga, Sachiko. (1996). The Linguistic Nature of Kanji Reexamined: Do Kanji Represent Only Meanings?. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 30.2: 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, Dimitrios. (2015). Graphetik. Form und Materialität von Schrift. Glückstadt: Hülsbusch. [URL]
. (2019). The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11.1: 26–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyễn, Đình-Hòa. (1996). Vietnamese. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 691–695. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poser, William J. (1992). The Structural Typology of Phonological Writing. Handout for a presentation to the Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia, January 12, 1992.
(2004). Phonological Writing and Phonological Representation. Handout for a presentation given at Harvard University, December 10, 2004.
Rickmeyer, Jens. (2014). Japanische Morphosyntax. Second, revised edition. Tübingen: Edition Julius Groos im Stauffenburg-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing Systems. A Linguistic Approach. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. (1985). Writing Systems. A Linguistic Introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Writing Systems. Second edition. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, Roland. (2018). Einführung in die grammatische Beschreibung des Deutschen. Third, revised edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard. (2000). A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. (1877). A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unger, J. Marshall. (2011). What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent?. Written Language & Literacy 14.2: 293–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Empirical Evidence and the Typology of Writing Systems: A Response to Handel. Scripta 61: 75–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016). Avoiding Circularity: A Response to Handel. Scripta 81: 87–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. (1959). Two chapters on written English. Brno Studies in English 11: 7–38. [URL]
Vance, Timothy J. (1987). An Introduction to Japanese Phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). What Students of Japanese Can Learn from Akkadian Cuneiform. Japanese Language and Literature 48.2: 341–379. [URL]
van der Kuijp, Leonard W. J. (1996). The Tibetan Script and Derivatives. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 431–441. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard L. (2004). In search of the perfect orthography. Written Language & Literacy 7.2: 139–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, John. (1669). An Historical Essay Endeavoring a Probability that the Language of the Empire of China is the Primitive Language. London: Brook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenck, Günther. (1959). Japanische Phonetik, vol. 4: Erscheinungen und Probleme des japanischen Lautwandels. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1966). The Phonemics of Japanese. Questions and Attempts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Iyengar, Arvind
2023. More matters of typology. Written Language & Literacy 26:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Osterkamp, Sven & Gordian Schreiber
2023. A proposal for a formalized, expandable approach to the taxonomy of writing systems. Written Language & Literacy 26:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue